NCT07426770

Brief Summary

The main goal of this study to compare self-training postpartum and training with a specialist support (physiotherapist and physical medicine and rehabilitation doctor) effect on pelvic floor dysfunction prevention and treatment in postpartum period. Hypothesis: The implementation of postpartum rehabilitation helps to alleviate existing symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction and prevents pelvic floor dysfunction. Study goals:

  • To objectively evaluate changes in pelvic organ position and pelvic floor muscle function in postpartum period, before and after specialised rehabilitation program
  • To objectively evaluate pelvic floor symptoms and their influence on woman life quality
  • To compare data (changes in pelvic floor muscle coordination and strength, pelvic organ position and changes in life quality according to validated questionnaires) Study participants will:
  • Get an examination by obstetrician-gynaecologist, physical medicine and rehabilitation doctor and physiotherapist in 6 to 10 weeks postpartum period.
  • One group of participants will attend physiotherapy, biofeedback and electro stimulation procedures with a guidance of a specialist.
  • Other group of participants gets a recommendations and instructions of training and self-trains at home. To remind of training and help record training time "squeezy" app (an application designed for a mobile device) will be offered.
  • All groups of participants will be asked to fill life quality related questionnaires: (ICIQ-UI SF: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire; P-QoL: Prolapse Quality-of-Life Questionnaire; PISQ-IR: Pelvic Organ Prolapse/ Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire IUGA revised; FSFI: female sexual function index; MOS-SF36 Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36).

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
40mo left

Started Jan 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress42%
Jan 2024Sep 2029

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 30, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 17, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 23, 2026

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2027

Expected
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2029

Last Updated

February 23, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

January 17, 2026

Last Update Submit

February 16, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Pelvic floor dysfunction postpartumPostpartum urinary incontinencePostpartum sexual dysfunctionDiastasis postpartumRehabilitation postpartum

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Improvement in pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms

    Self-reported improvement of symptoms (for example: pain, urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, vaginal "laxity")

    Asked at the beginning (first postpartum visit, 6-8 weeks postpartum), after first set of training (6months), after second set of training (12 months)

  • Change in PFM contraction force and strength according to the Modified Oxford Scale

    Individual change in Oxford scores (0-5), bigger number means stronger contraction.

    Measured before training, immediately after first set of training, 6 months from the beginning, before starting second set of training and immediately after second set of training, about 12 months from the beginning

  • Change in POP-Q scale

    changes in POP-Q scales (especially in gh - genital hiatus, pb - perineal body, measured by centimeters, bigger number in gh means wider genital hiatus -worse outcome; smaller number in pb means thin perineal body - worse outcome)

    Measured before starting the program, after first set of training (6 months from beginning) and after second set of training (12 months from beginning)

  • Change in life quality questionnaires ICIQ-UI SF

    Quality of Life (QoL) and clinical outcome questionnaires: \* ICIQ-UI SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form); scores 1-21, higher the number - worse outcome

    Questionnaires will be given at the beginning (excluding sexual function related questionnaires, due to short time after delivery), after first set of training (6 months from the beginning), after second set of training (12 months from the beginning).

  • Better voluntary pelvic floor muscle control

    observation (compensatory muscles: abdominal, thighs, glutes movements during the contraction)

    Measured before training, immediately after first set of training, 6 months from the beginning, before starting second set of training and immediately after second set of training, about 12 months from the beginning

  • Objectively measured change in pelvic floor muscle strength

    Contraction measured with Myomed biofeedback device (manometry kPha)

    Measured before training, immediately after first set of training, 6 months from the beginning, before starting second set of training and immediately after second set of training, about 12 months from the beginning

  • Quality of Life (QoL) and clinical outcome questionnaires: P-QoL

    P-QoL (Prolapse Quality-of-Life Questionnaire) measures the impact of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) on a patient's life across eight domains, with total scores ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). High scores indicate poor quality of life, while lower scores (often \<40 or \<20) indicate higher QOL and improvement after intervention

    Questionnaires will be given at the beginning (excluding sexual function related questionnaires, due to short time after delivery), after first set of training (6 months from the beginning), after second set of training (12 months from the beginning).

  • Quality of Life (QoL) and clinical outcome questionnaires: PISQ-IR

    PISQ-IR (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire IUGA revised) evaluates female sexual function (FSF) in women with pelvic floor disorders (PFD), using a 2.68 summary score cutoff for sexually active (SA) women to identify sexual dysfunction (values \>2.68 indicate no dysfunction). The survey separates patients into SA and not sexually active (NSA) groups. SA Scale: Higher scores indicate better sexual function. A mean score \\(\>2.68\\) suggests no dysfunction, with \\(90\\%\\) sensitivity and \\(73\\%\\) specificity.NSA Scale: Higher scores indicate a greater negative impact of pelvic floor disorders on sexual inactivity.

    Questionnaires will be given at the beginning (excluding sexual function related questionnaires, due to short time after delivery), after first set of training (6 months from the beginning), after second set of training (12 months from the beginning)

  • Quality of Life (QoL) and clinical outcome questionnaires: FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index)

    FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index) is a 19-item validated questionnaire assessing female sexual function over the past month, with total scores ranging from 2.0 to 36.0. A total score of ≤26.55 is the standard cutoff indicating a potential risk for Female Sexual Dysfunction (FSD). Higher scores indicate better, more robust sexual functioning

    Questionnaires will be given at the beginning (excluding sexual function related questionnaires, due to short time after delivery), after first set of training (6 months from the beginning), after second set of training (12 months from the beginning)

  • Quality of Life (QoL) and clinical outcome questionnaires: MOS-SF36

    MOS-SF36 (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36). s a 36-item, patient-reported survey measuring health-related quality of life across eight dimensions. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each subscale, with higher scores indicating better health functioning or fewer limitations. The survey evaluates physical, mental, and social health domains

    Questionnaires will be given at the beginning (excluding sexual function related questionnaires, due to short time after delivery), after first set of training (6 months from the beginning), after second set of training (12 months from the beginning)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Factors potentially influencing the effectiveness of the rehabilitation program: mean age

    Asked and documented at first postpartum visit, 6-8 weeks postpartum

  • Other participant and birth related factors which may have influence on pelvic floor: BMI

    Asked and documented at first postpartum visit, 6-8 weeks postpartum

  • Other participant and birth related factors which may have influence on pelvic floor: number of births

    Asked and documented at first postpartum visit, 6-8 weeks postpartum

  • Other participant and birth related factors which may have influence on pelvic floor: mode of delivery

    Asked and documented at first postpartum visit, 6-8 weeks postpartum

Study Arms (2)

Group of participants getting specialist supervised training postpartum

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Woman 6-10 weeks postpartum starts training program with physiotherapist and physical medicine and rehabilitation physician supervision.

Behavioral: Rehabilitation postpartum

Group of participants doing self-training with an app

OTHER

Woman 6-10 weeks postpartum starts self- training program at home. At the beginning they are instructed by physiotherapist and physical medicine and rehabilitation physician. This group use an app "squeezy" to remind the to do training and record training time.

Behavioral: Self-training

Interventions

* 4 Times biofeedback training * 10 times physiotherapy with specialist * 10 times transcutaneal electrostimulation (TENS)

Also known as: Physiotherapy, Biofeedback training, electrostimulation
Group of participants getting specialist supervised training postpartum
Self-trainingBEHAVIORAL

* training at home after physiotherapist instructions * using an app to record training frequency, length

Also known as: pelvic floor dysfunction app
Group of participants doing self-training with an app

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsFemale who had given birth
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • years or older
  • This pregnancy was singleton
  • No contraindications for physical activity
  • No connective tissue disorders (for example Ehlers-Danlos syndrome)
  • No neurological disorders to influence pelvic floor symptoms (for example clinically significant spinal disc herniation)

You may not qualify if:

  • Younger than 18 years
  • Twins or triplet pregnancy
  • Contraindications for physical activity
  • Connective tissue disorders
  • Neurological disorders

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Vilnius University: study centers: "Vilnius University Hospital " Santaros Clinic", "Vilniaus Gimdymo Namai"

Vilnius, Lithuania

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women Stephanie J WoodleyPeter LawrensonRhianon BoyleJune D CodySiv MørkvedAshleigh KernohanE Jean C Hay-Smith Version published: 07 May 2020

    BACKGROUND
  • Sigurdardottir T, Steingrimsdottir T, Geirsson RT, Halldorsson TI, Aspelund T, Bo K. Postpartum pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor muscle training: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of primiparous women. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jun;34(6):1319-1326. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05502-8. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

    PMID: 36995416BACKGROUND
  • Beamish NF, Davenport MH, Ali MU, Gervais MJ, Sjwed TN, Bains G, Sivak A, Deering RE, Ruchat SM. Impact of postpartum exercise on pelvic floor disorders and diastasis recti abdominis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2025 Mar 31;59(8):562-575. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108619.

    PMID: 39694630BACKGROUND
  • Romeikiene KE, Bartkeviciene D. Pelvic-Floor Dysfunction Prevention in Prepartum and Postpartum Periods. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 16;57(4):387. doi: 10.3390/medicina57040387.

    PMID: 33923810BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Interventions

Physical Therapy ModalitiesTranscutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TherapeuticsRehabilitationElectric Stimulation TherapyAnalgesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Study Officials

  • Lina Būtėnaitė, MD, PhD

    Vilnius University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Daiva Bartkevičienė, Assoc. prof.

    Vilnius University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Eglė Pilkionytė, MD

    Vilnius University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Ivona Ivanovska, MD

    Vilnius University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Rūta Petravičienė

    Vilnius University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Karolina Eva Romeikienė, MD, PhD student

    Vilnius University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Karolina Eva Romeikiene, Medical doctor, PHD student

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Study participant will do two different options of training postpartum. Group one - training with specialist supervision Group two - self-training
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Obstetrician-gynaecologist, PhD student, Karolina Eva Romeikiene

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2026

First Posted

February 23, 2026

Study Start

January 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2029

Last Updated

February 23, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Researchers may share de-identified individual participant data such like: age, bmi, pop-q scores etc. In excell or other analyzable data set.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
It is planned around september 2027-2028
Access Criteria
If other researches would like use data from this study they may ask for an IPD. Study protocol and results report will be shared with other researches as a future publication and in clinicaltrials.gov site.

Locations