Project VERANDA: Requirement Analysis Survey
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Between 0.6% and 22.2% of the global adult male population has a sexual interest in children (SIIC), depending on evaluation methods \[1\]. SIIC constitutes a major risk factor for child sexual abuse (CSA) and viewing of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). The true rates of CSA offences cannot be estimated, but self-report studies find 30 times higher rates of child-reported CSA compared to reports from child protection services or police. Engagement in therapy is a protective factor against the risk of child sexual abuse and can lead to reductions in CSAM consumption and severity. Anticipated negative therapist behaviour is associated with less willingness to seek treatment. The fear of being reported by the therapist discourages participation in therapy, a concern complicated by mandatory reporting laws in some countries. Negative attitudes towards ISIC are high, and SIIC may be the most stigmatised trait globally. Identifying barriers to treatment for ISIC, and of measures to overcome them, is important to increase therapy engagement, with the goal to improve wellbeing, reduce CSAM consumption, and reduce the risk of CSA offences. Patient anonymity during therapy may play an important role in increasing disclosure of stigmatised traits. It remains unclear whether anonymous therapy addresses patient treatment anxieties and therefore increases the comfort or willingness to engage in therapy. To address this research gap, we conduct an anonymous online survey with ISIC to answer the following questions: RQ1. Can online therapy preferences be identified for minor-attacted individuals and for their therapists? RQ2. Are there individual factors that predict stigmatized individuals' online therapy preferences? (E.g. Trust, Self-Stigma) RQ3. Are there differences between the different stigmatized groups', therapists, and general populations' online therapy preferences?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 13, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 14, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 14, 2026
CompletedMarch 13, 2026
March 1, 2026
1 year
February 16, 2026
March 12, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Preferences of design features
RQ1.1 Can preferences of design features for an online therapy tool be identified for minor-attacted individuals and for their therapists? RQ3.4 Are there differences between the different groups in the preferred choice of consultation technology? Preferences of design features for an online therapy tool: 7-point Likert scale.
May 2025 - May 2026
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Preferred choice of consultation method
May 2025 - May 2026
Other Outcomes (10)
Preferred choice of consultation technology
May 2025 - May 2026
Preference of having PETs for an online therapy tool
May 2025 - May 2026
Willingness to engage in therapy
May 2025 - May 2026
- +7 more other outcomes
Study Arms (9)
Individuals with a sexual interest in children
Transgender and gender-diverse people
Sex workers
Healthcare workers
Individuals who have experienced child sexual abuse
Therapists for individuals with a sexual interest in children
Therapists of transgender and gender-diverse individuals
Therapists of sex workers
General public
Eligibility Criteria
The investigators do not assign participants to conditions, instead the investigators have different target groups: Groups that experience stigmatization: Individuals with a sexual interest in children Transgender and gender-diverse people Sex workers Healthcare workers Individuals who have experienced child sexual abuse Groups that provide services to stigmatized groups: Therapists for individuals with a sexual interest in children Therapists of transgender and gender-diverse individuals Therapists of sex workers Control/comparison group: General public
You may qualify if:
- Belonging to one of the target groups.
- Otherwise, for general members of the public, none.
You may not qualify if:
- Younger than 18
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, State of Berlin, 10117, Germany
Related Publications (10)
Fear NT, Seddon R, Jones N, Greenberg N, Wessely S. Does anonymity increase the reporting of mental health symptoms? BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 17;12:797. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-797.
PMID: 22985427RESULTJahnke S, Imhoff R, Hoyer J. Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: two comparative surveys. Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Jan;44(1):21-34. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0312-4. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
PMID: 24948422RESULTEdwards W, Hensley C. Contextualizing Sex Offender Management Legislation and Policy: Evaluating the Problem of Latent Consequences in Community Notification Laws. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2001 Feb 1;45(1):83-101.
RESULTGrady MD, Levenson JS, Mesias G, Kavanagh S, Charles J. "I can't talk about that": Stigma and fear as barriers to preventive services for minor-attracted persons. Stigma and Health. 2019;4(4):400-10.
RESULTJahnke S, McPhail IV, Antfolk J. Stigma processes, psychological distress, and attitudes toward seeking treatment among pedohebephilic people. PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0312382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312382. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39446727RESULTSchuler M, Gieseler H, Schweder KW, von Heyden M, Beier KM. Characteristics of the Users of Troubled Desire, a Web-Based Self-management App for Individuals With Sexual Interest in Children: Descriptive Analysis of Self-assessment Data. JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Feb 19;8(2):e22277. doi: 10.2196/22277.
PMID: 33605895RESULTVan Deinse TB, Cuddeback GS, Wilson AB, Edwards D Jr, Lambert M. Variation in Criminogenic Risks by Mental Health Symptom Severity: Implications for Mental Health Services and Research. Psychiatr Q. 2021 Mar;92(1):73-84. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09782-x.
PMID: 32458340RESULTBeier KM, Grundmann D, Kuhle LF, Scherner G, Konrad A, Amelung T. The German Dunkelfeld project: a pilot study to prevent child sexual abuse and the use of child abusive images. J Sex Med. 2015 Feb;12(2):529-42. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12785. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
PMID: 25471337RESULTStoltenborgh M, van Ijzendoorn MH, Euser EM, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. A global perspective on child sexual abuse: meta-analysis of prevalence around the world. Child Maltreat. 2011 May;16(2):79-101. doi: 10.1177/1077559511403920. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
PMID: 21511741RESULTSavoie V, Quayle E, Flynn E. Prevalence and correlates of individuals with sexual interest in children: A systematic review. Child Abuse Negl. 2021 May;115:105005. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105005. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
PMID: 33691252RESULT
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2026
First Posted
February 20, 2026
Study Start
May 13, 2025
Primary Completion
May 14, 2026
Study Completion
May 14, 2026
Last Updated
March 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03