Electrotherapeutic Interventions for Glenohumeral Subluxation After Stroke
Comparison of the Clinical and Sonographic Outcomes of NMES and EMG Biofeedback Therapies in Stroke Patients With Glenohumeral Subluxation: Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this single-blind randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of two therapies-neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback-in stroke patients with shoulder (glenohumeral) subluxation. The study will evaluate changes in shoulder structure and function by measuring the acromion-greater tuberosity distance, supraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscle thickness, shoulder range of motion, and Brunnstrom stage of the upper extremity and hand. Clinical outcomes such as shoulder pain, stroke-specific quality of life, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) will also be assessed. This trial is designed to provide evidence on which therapy may be more effective for improving shoulder stability, reducing pain, and enhancing quality of life in stroke survivors with shoulder subluxation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 27, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 27, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 27, 2026
February 20, 2026
January 1, 2026
7 months
September 29, 2025
February 19, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Acromion-Greater Tuberosity Distance (AGT Distance) - Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Measurement
"The acromion-greater tuberosity (AGT) distance will be measured using standardized musculoskeletal ultrasound. The measurement will be performed on the hemiparetic shoulder with the participant in a seated position. The AGT distance represents the linear distance between the lateral edge of the acromion and the greater tuberosity of the humerus." Unit of Measure: millimeters (mm)
Baseline and Week 3
Supraspinatus Muscle Thickness Measured by Musculoskeletal Ultrasound
Supraspinatus muscle thickness will be measured at the predefined anatomic landmark on the hemiparetic side using musculoskeletal ultrasound. Increased muscle thickness after intervention will be interpreted as improved muscle activation or preservation. Unit of Measure: millimeters (mm)
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 3
Posterior Deltoid Muscle Thickness Measured by Musculoskeletal Ultrasound
Posterior deltoid muscle thickness will be measured on the affected side using musculoskeletal ultrasound with the same probe position and gain settings at each visit. Increased thickness will be interpreted as improved muscle recruitment or prevention of disuse atrophy. Unit of Measure:millimeters (mm)
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 3
Motor Function
Motor recovery will be evaluated using the Brunnstrom Motor Recovery Stages, a 6-stage clinical scale that assesses motor recovery after stroke. The Brunnstrom Motor Recovery Stages assess the upper extremity, hand and lower extremity separately. A score of 1 represents the poorest motor function, whereas a score of 6 represents the best motor function. In this study, the Brunnstrom scale will be applied to evaluate the upper extremity and hand.
Baseline and Week 3
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Visual Analog Scale
Baseline and Week 3
Passive Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM)
Baseline and Week 3
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Baseline and Week 3
Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL)
Baseline and Week 3
Study Arms (3)
NMES Group
EXPERIMENTALFifteen sessions of NMES with conventional physiotherapy
EMG Biofeedback Group
EXPERIMENTALFifteen sessions of Electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback therapy with conventional physiotherapy
Conventional group
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional physiotherapy
Interventions
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) will be administered to the supraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscles for 20 minutes daily, five days per week, over a period of three weeks, totaling 15 treatment sessions. All groups will undergo a conventional physiotherapy program consisting of 45-minute sessions, five days per week, for three weeks, totaling 15 sessions. The program will comprise range of motion exercises, stretching, progressive resistive exercises, and activities of daily living-oriented exercises.
Electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback therapy will be applied to the supraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscles for 20 minutes daily, five days per week, over a period of three weeks, totaling 15 treatment sessions. All groups will undergo a conventional physiotherapy program consisting of 45-minute sessions, five days per week, for three weeks, totaling 15 sessions. The program will comprise range of motion exercises, stretching, progressive resistive exercises, and activities of daily living-oriented exercises.
This group will participate exclusively in a conventional physiotherapy program for 45 minutes daily, five days per week, over a period of three weeks, totaling 15 sessions. The conventional program will include range of motion exercises, stretching, progressive resistive exercises, and exercises targeting activities of daily living.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥18 years of age,
- Disease duration \>3 months,
- Glenohumeral subluxation (GHS) confirmed by ultrasonography (USG),
- Upper extremity and hand Brunnstrom motor stages between 2 and 5
You may not qualify if:
- Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \<24,
- Visual/hearing impairments, or neglect,
- Steroid injection for shoulder pain within the last 3 months,
- Unstable systemic disease,
- Spasticity with Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score 3-4,
- Presence of metal implants or pacemaker
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Şahide Eda ARTUÇlead
Study Sites (1)
Gaziler Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Turkkan C, Ozturk GT, Ugurlu FG, Ersoz M. Ultrasonographic assessment of neuromuscular electrical stimulation efficacy on glenohumeral subluxation in patients with hemiplegia: a randomized-controlled study. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May 17;63(4):287-292. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2017.953. eCollection 2017 Dec.
PMID: 31453469BACKGROUNDWhitehair VC, Chae J, Hisel T, Wilson RD. The effect of electrical stimulation on impairment of the painful post-stroke shoulder. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019 Oct;26(7):544-547. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1633796. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
PMID: 31298627BACKGROUNDChuang LL, Chen YL, Chen CC, Li YC, Wong AM, Hsu AL, Chang YJ. Effect of EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation with bilateral arm training on hemiplegic shoulder pain and arm function after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Nov 28;14(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0332-0.
PMID: 29183339BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The investigator performing sonographic and clinical outcome assessments will be blinded to treatment allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, MD, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Specialist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2025
First Posted
February 20, 2026
Study Start
February 27, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 27, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 27, 2026
Last Updated
February 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results and will remain available for at least 5 years.
- Access Criteria
- Qualified researchers affiliated with academic or medical institutions may request access by contacting the principal investigator. Access will be granted after approval of a proposal and signing of a data use agreement
De-identified individual participant data (IPD), including baseline characteristics and outcome measures, will be shared with qualified researchers upon reasonable request. Data will be available after publication of the main results.