Assessing the Functional Benefit of Structured Psychological Coaching in Mentally Vulnerable Patients With a Surgically Treated Proximal Humerus Fracture.
ELEVATE
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Although physical factors play an important role in the treatment and outcomes after proximal humerus fracture (PHF), psychosocial factors need to be taken into account as well. Few studies have been done to assess the influence of psychosocial factors and mental distress on the outcomes after shoulder surgery and show that it has a negative correlation on the outcomes. It is reported that having low resilience, negative thoughts, signs of depression or anxiety have a significant negative relation with the patient reported outcomes (PROMs). Mental vulnerability is linked to neuroticism, a personality factor of the Big Five traits, that can be characterized by the tendency to experience negative affect, especially when threatened, frustrated, or facing loss. Neuroticism is related to worse outcomes of health and disease in patients. Although studies have been done to objectify the correlation between psychological factors and functional outcomes after surgery there has not yet been a trial where an intervention has taken place to improve functional outcomes when patients have neurotic tendencies. With this study, we aim to improve the functional outcomes for patients with neuroticism and proximal humerus fractures undergoing surgery by giving them psychological training in the form of focused cognitive behavioral therapy additionally to the standard care. Psychological treatment has shown to improve the well-being of the 'patient characteristics associated with neuroticism and reduce rumination and worry. Therefore, we hypothesize that providing psychological guidance, consisting of a focused cognitive behavioral therapy program, to patients with neuroticism after a PHF will lead to better patient related outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
February 17, 2026
February 1, 2026
2 years
January 10, 2026
February 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Functional outcome score - Constant Shoulder Score
The Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) is a comprehensive questionnaire that evaluates shoulder function across four domains: pain, activities of daily living (ADLs), range of motion (ROM), and strength. Pain and ADLs are self-reported by the patient, while ROM and strength are assessed by an investigator. Strength is measured at a 90-degree lateral abduction angle. The CSS consists of 10 items, with a separate assessment for each arm, providing a detailed measure of shoulder function. Lowest score is 0 and highest score is 100. A higher score indicates a better function.
The score will be tested at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Functional outcome core - Oxford Shoulder Score
The score will be tested at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.
Functional outcome score - quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand
The score will be tested at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.
Pain levels using Visual Analogue Scale
The score will be tested at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.
Complications after surgery
The outcome will be tested at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.
Range of motion
The outcome will be tested at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control arm
NO INTERVENTIONStandard care is administered to these participants. Standard care consisting of a surgical treatment of the proximal humerus fracture, painkillers, multiple outpatient clinic visits during recovery and a referral to an physical therapist.
Psychological intervention arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORPsychological guidance consisting of 8 sessions with a licensed psychologist. The participants in this group will also get standard care.
Interventions
Psychological guidance consists of 8 sessions cognitive behavior therapy and starts three weeks after surgery. Sessions consist of psychoeducation and evidence-based interventions and exercises concerning gradual activation relaxation techniques, pain perception and coping with pain, changing unhelpful beliefs, fear, worry about pain and revalidation. Improving treatment adherence (physiotherapy, medication, psychological treatment) and (perceived) social support. Treatment will be guided by licensed medical psychologists. The first 3 sessions will be at the hospital outpatient clinic of the psychologists and the other 5 sessions will be either via videocall or at the outpatient clinic, by patients' choice. The sessions will last 45-60 minutes. There is no use of comparator or placebo.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Surgically treated proximal humerus fracture, not older than two weeks
- A high or very high level of neuroticism (cut-off score on NEO-FFI test off 37)
- Minimal age of 18 years
- The fracture must be a mono-injury (not part of a multi-injury incident)
You may not qualify if:
- Any diagnosed psychiatric disorder that is not adequately managed with medication.
- Not being able to communicate: language barrier, neurologic disorders
- Paralysis on the affected arm
- Not able to participate in online or real time psychological training
- Any other fracture besides the proximal humerus fracture in an upper extremity
- Head trauma with neurological symptoms
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amsterdam University Medical Centercollaborator
- OLVGcollaborator
- Red Cross Hospital Beverwijkcollaborator
- Zaandam Medical Centerlead
Study Sites (4)
Amsterdam University Medical Center
Amsterdam, Netherlands
OLVG
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Red Cross Hospital
Beverwijk, Netherlands
Zaandam Medical Center
Zaandam, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Jan Derksen, MD, PhD, MSc
Zaandam Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The investigator is blinded. The participants and care givers are due to the nature of the intervention not blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator; MD, Phd, MSc
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2026
First Posted
February 17, 2026
Study Start
December 2, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
February 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02