TAVR vs SAVR in Severe Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis
BELIEVERS
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Replacement: EvaLuatIon of transcathetEr VERsus Surgery (BELIEVERS) Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
1,200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study is a multicenter, randomized superiority trial of standard of care therapies for severe aortic stenosis (AS) in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). The two primary comparators in this study are: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR), and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR). TAVR is a minimally invasive transcatheter procedure to treat aortic valve disease.. SAVR is involving the open chest surgery to replace the aortic valve. The devices and international procedures in this Trial (TAVR or SAVR) are commercially approved by the FDA. Consented patients who are qualifying for the Trial will be randomized 1:1, meaning they will have an equal chance to be treated with either TAVR or SAVR procedure. Consented patients who will not qualify for the randomized part of the study they will be followed up clinically in either TAVR or SAVR Registry arms. The study objective is to provide evidence to guide patients and their providers on the most appropriate therapy for valve replacement on this particular BAV anatomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 5, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2032
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 10, 2040
February 17, 2026
January 1, 2026
6.2 years
January 30, 2026
February 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare the safety and efficacy of TAVR vs SAVR for the treatment of severe AS in patients with BAV
A hierarchical composite (assessed by Win ratio at latest available follow-up) of: 1. death, 2. disabling stroke, 3. non-disabling stroke, 4. valve reintervention, 5. rehospitalization†, 6. unfavorable KCCQ (VARC-3\*)
2 years post end of enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Time-averaged KCCQ
3 years post end of enrollment
KCCQ status (serial)
at 2 years post end of enrollment
SF-12 questionnaire
at 2 years post end of enrollment
NYHA class
at 2 years post end of enrollment
6-minute walk test
at 2 years post end of enrollment
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement TAVR
OTHERpercutaneous approach as modality of treatment
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement SAVR
ACTIVE COMPARATORopen chest approach as modality of treatment
Interventions
This is a transcatheter, percutaneous approach using the commercially approved bioprosthetic valve device to replace the diseased aortic valve
This is the open chest surgical approach using the commercially approved bioprosthetic valve device to replace the diseased aortic valve
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older at time of consent
- Severe AS deemed suitable for a bioprosthesis by a local heart team (unsuitable or patient declined a mechanical valve or Ross procedure, following demonstration of evidence-based shared decision making with a validated decision-aid(1)
- Gated contrast CT available and suitable for core laboratory analysis;
You may not qualify if:
- Recent cardiovascular intervention within the prior 30 days.
- Presence of an existing TAVR or SAVR device
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Extreme or prohibitive TAVR or SAVR risk, determined by site or committee
- Active enrollment in another investigational study
- Disproportionate TAVR vs SAVR risk, as adjudicated by the patient selection committee
- Associated aortopathy (AA≥45mm by maximal cross-sectional dimension, as confirmed by CT core laboratory analysis, or AA\<45mm but site plan for surgery of the aorta in the event of randomization to surgery
- Site plan for treatment of concomitant non-coronary cardiovascular disease in the event of randomization to surgery (for instance, concomitant valve surgery, septal defect or coarctation repair, aorta or root replacement or repair)
- In the presence of coronary artery disease deemed necessary for revascularization in the event of randomization to SAVR or TAVR, Syntax score ≥ 32 or deemed unsuitable for PCI, or deemed unsuitable for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
- Pre-specified plan, if randomized to TAVR, for platform other than contemporary Edwards Sapien or Medtronic Evolut platform (platform must be stated prior to randomization).
- Leukopenia (WBC \< 3000 cells/µL), anemia (Hgb \< 8 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Plt \< 50,000 cells/µL).
- Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation, or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of randomization
- Ventricular dysfunction with LVEF \< 25%
- Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 90 days of randomization
- Renal insufficiency (eGFR \< 30 ml/min per the Cockcroft-Gault formula)
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Centerlead
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaicollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Raj Makkar, MD
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcio Diniz, PhD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vinod Thourani, MD
Emory University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2026
First Posted
February 17, 2026
Study Start
April 5, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2032
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 10, 2040
Last Updated
February 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01