Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy OF 2% Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve (IANB) Block Versus Primary Buccal Infilteration With 4% Articaine in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis(SIP) IN Mandibular First Molars
IANB SIP EPT
1 other identifier
interventional
330
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 2% lignocaine administered through an inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in one group of participants with 4% articaine delivered via primary buccal infiltration in other group in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular first molars.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2027
February 13, 2026
January 1, 2026
6 months
December 7, 2025
February 7, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Anesthetic efficacy
Description: Patients will be assigned to one of the two groups . Group 1: 2%Lignocaine 1;80,000 epinephrine 1.8 ml IANB Group 2: 4%Articaine 1:100,000 epinephrine 1.8 ml Primary buccal infilteration Efficacy will be considered if there are 2 consecutive non-responsive readings during 60 mins duration , usually measured on EPT 15 mins after administration of anesthesia . Any pain felt during the procedure will be measured according to Heft-Parker VAS and moderate-severe pain reported (VAS ≥ 55) will be regarded unsuccessful . Time Frame: 1 hour after administration of local anesthetic agent .
1 hour after administration of anesthetic agent
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Duration of anesthesia
1 hour 30 mins
Study Arms (2)
ARM 1 : 2%Lignocaine 1:80,000 epinephrine
ACTIVE COMPARATOR: 2% Lignocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB) Participants in this group will receive an inferior alveolar nerve block using 2% Lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine.
ARM 2 : 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group will receive 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine at the site of the mandibular first molar.
Interventions
Participants in this group will receive a buccal infiltration of 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine at the site of the mandibular first molar. The injection will follow standard buccal infiltration technique. Anesthetic efficacy will be evaluated during endodontic treatment using the same pain assessment method as Arm 1.
2% Lignocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB) : Participants in this group will receive an inferior alveolar nerve block using 2% Lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine. The injection will be administered following standard IANB technique for mandibular first molars. The anesthetic efficacy will be assessed with 2 consecutive non responsive readings on EPT objectivelt and via Heft-Parker VAS not more than ≥55 .
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Systemically healthy patients classified as ASA I, aged 18-55 years.
- Permanent mandibular first molar tooth requiring endodontic therapy.
- Diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis without swelling or sinus.
- Normal periapical radiographic appearance (no evidence of periapical pathology).
- Moderate pain as assessed by the Heft-Parker VAS (\>54 mm and \<114 mm).
- Lingering pain or prolonged response to cold testing (lasting more than 10 seconds).
- Positive response to electric pulp testing.
- Outcome assessed must be pulpal anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or lactating mothers.
- Teeth with reversible pulpitis, previously treated, or with calcified canals.
- Teeth with severe periodontal disease or periapical radiolucency.
- Patients who have taken analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs within 6 hours before the treatment visit.
- Patients on medications that could potentially interact with the anesthetic solution (e.g., antihypertensives, anticoagulants).
- History of allergy to 4% articaine, lidocaine, or epinephrine.
- Systemic diseases, immunocompromised states, or significant anxiety/mental health disorders.
- History of vasovagal syncope on local anesthetic administration
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry AFID CMH Rawalpindi
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46000, Pakistan
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants will be blinded to the type of local anesthetic technique administered. They will not be informed whether they received an IANB with 2% Lignocaine or Buccal Infilteration with 4% Articaine. The operator and investigator can not be blindeddue to the nature of the procedure.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Sadia Shehzadi
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2025
First Posted
February 13, 2026
Study Start
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Last Updated
February 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will not be shared because the study does not include plans or infrastructure for secure long term data storage, de-identification, and controlled access needed to protect participants privacy .Additionally, the data sheet is small and disclosure may include the risk of re-identification, summary results will be made available as required.