Comparing Adjuvant Treatments for High Tone Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The researchers are comparing two treatments for high tone pelvic floor dysfunction (HTPFD) in conjunction with pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT). The goal of this study is to find out which of two extra treatments works better for people with HTPFD when they also do regular PFPT. First, the researchers will compare a muscle relaxant medicine (cyclobenzaprine IR) to using a vibrating pelvic floor massage wand. Everyone in the study will also do pelvic floor physical therapy. The researchers want to see how these treatments affect pain, sexual health, physical ability, and overall quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 18, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
February 20, 2026
February 1, 2026
10 months
February 3, 2026
February 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference 4a score
PROMIS pain interference 4a score is from 4 questions with score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference
Baseline, 18 weeks
PROMIS pain interference 4a score
PROMIS pain interference 4a score is from 4 questions with score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference
Baseline, 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (12)
50% reduction in PROMIS pain interference 4a score
18 weeks compared to baseline
PROMIS pain intensity 1a score
Baseline, 18 weeks
PROMIS pain intensity 1a score
Baseline, 6 weeks
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Baseline, 18 weeks
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Baseline, 6 weeks
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cyclobenzaprine PFPT
EXPERIMENTALDuring Phase 1, participants will be instructed to use cyclobenzaprine as detailed below. During Phase 2, participants will complete a course of pelvic floor physical therapy and will continue using cyclobenzaprine.
Pelvic floor massage wand & PFPT
EXPERIMENTALDuring Phase 1, participants will be instructed to use pelvic floor massage wand as detailed below. During Phase 2, participants will complete a course of pelvic floor physical therapy and will continue using pelvic floor massage wand.
Interventions
Participants will be instructed to use cyclobenzaprine IR 5mg at bedtime. We will encourage participants to take the medication in the evening/before bed to minimize potential for bothersome sedation. Participants will be given the option to begin with ½ tablet (2.5mg) if preferred and titrate to 5mg dose, with goal of minimizing sedation side effects. Participants will be instructed that they may increase to 10mg at bedtime at Day 14 if desired based on perceived benefits and side effects.
Participants will be instructed to use a commercially available vibrating pelvic floor massage wand for approximately 10-15 minutes at least 3 times per week, which can be titrated as needed (standard use recommendations per our pelvic physical therapists).
Pelvic floor physical therapy for HTPFD uses manual manipulation to release localized muscle tension or trigger points, improve mobility of fascia, and address orthopaedic issues such as pelvic alignment and spine/hip mobility to reduce pain and improve function.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Self-reported moderate to severe chronic pelvic pain for \>6 months duration at time of screening visit. Moderate to severe chronic pain is defined as \>4 on 0-10 (worst daily pain) for \>14 days per month. Pelvic pain is defined as pain perceived to be located in the anatomic pelvis.
- Diagnosis of high tone pelvic floor dysfunction (HTPFD), defined as \>12/60 summative pelvic floor tenderness score on standardized pelvic examination by chronic pelvic pain specialist (MD or NP) within the past year
- Referred to pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) by their chronic pelvic pain specialist for management of HTPFD
- Willing to undergo a 12-session course of PFPT for HTPFD, including internal/vaginal tissue manipulation per standardized protocol
- Willing to delay start of PFPT until Phase 2 of the trial
- Willing to be randomized to either daily use of cyclobenzaprine or use of vibrating pelvic floor muscle massage wand for total of 18 weeks
- Willing to undergo standardized pelvic floor myofascial exam three times over the study period (baseline, end of Phase 1, end of Phase 2)
- Willing to undergo quantitative sensory testing (QST) two times over the study period (baseline, end of Phase 1)
- Willing to undergo blood draw two times over the study period (baseline, end of Phase 1)
- Ability to read and speak English to allow for written informed consent, phenotyping, and patient-reported outcome measures
- No plans for pregnancy within the next 12 months
You may not qualify if:
- Hypersensitivity or allergy to cyclobenzaprine or any component of cyclobenzaprine
- Underwent PFPT within 6 months of screening date
- Pregnancy at any point during study period (self-reported home urine pregnancy test or serum b-Hcg test, positive urine pregnancy test at baseline, post-Phase 1, or post-Phase 2 study visits).
- Currently breastfeeding at time of screening visit
- Scheduled for or are planning moderate/major gynecologic surgery (including hysterectomy, excision of endometriosis, ovarian cystectomy/oopherectomy, myomectomy) within the following 6 months of screening date
- Current (at time of screening visit) diagnosis of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome
- Current significant neurologic or musculoskeletal conditions that would preclude participation in PFPT (cerebral palsy, severe hip/back osteoarthritis that would prevent lithotomy position during sessions)
- Unwilling to avoid or stop baseline use of cyclobenzaprine and other muscle relaxants (including methocarbamol, tizanidine, baclofen, carisoprodol, metaxalone)
- Current use of tricyclic antidepressants
- Current use of monoamine oxidase inhibitor
- Current use of vaginally delivered benzodiazepine such as diazepam (more than once per month) and unwilling to stop use of vaginally delivered benzodiazepine for the duration of this study
- Current diagnosis of hyperthyroidism
- Current diagnosis of moderate or severe hepatic impairment
- Myocardial infarction within prior 12 months
- Current diagnosis of congestive heart failure
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sara Till, MD, MPH
University of Michigan
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2026
First Posted
February 11, 2026
Study Start
February 18, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- The research community will have access to the data when the award ends.
- Access Criteria
- academic researchers and other community members with a legitimate scientific interest in the research. Members of the scientific community who would like a curated copy of the final datasets (i.e., datasets underlying publications) from this study can request a copy by contacting the principal investigators.
Final de-identified, anonymized data sets underlying all publications resulting from the proposed research involving human subjects will be shared with legitimate academic researchers and other community members with a legitimate scientific interest in the research. Where practicable, sharing will take place under a written agreement between the principal investigators prohibiting the recipient from identifying or re-identifying (or taking steps to identify or re-identify) any individual whose data are included in the datasets. The aim is to permit others to validate and replicate research findings described in the Aims while protecting participant confidentiality.