NCT07403578

Brief Summary

This prospective randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effects of different anesthesia protocols on anesthetic success and intraoperative pain during root canal treatment of mandibular premolars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. A total of 100 systemically healthy patients were randomly allocated into four groups: infiltration anesthesia alone, inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) alone, infiltration anesthesia combined with cryotherapy, and IANB combined with cryotherapy. Cryotherapy was applied intraorally for 5 minutes immediately after anesthetic administration. The effectiveness of anesthesia was confirmed using electric pulp testing and cold testing prior to treatment. Root canal therapy was completed in a single visit by a calibrated operator. Intraoperative pain was assessed during access cavity preparation using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Anesthetic success was defined as the presence of no or mild pain, whereas moderate or severe pain indicated anesthetic failure and required supplemental anesthesia. The primary objective of the study was to determine whether the adjunctive use of cryotherapy improves anesthetic success and reduces intraoperative pain in mandibular premolars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. The null hypothesis was that no significant differences would be observed among the study groups in terms of anesthetic success or intraoperative pain intensity.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Jan 2026

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress29%
Jan 2026Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 14, 2026

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 30, 2026

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 11, 2026

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2026

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

February 11, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

January 14, 2026

Last Update Submit

February 10, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Intraoperative pain

    Intraoperative pain intensity assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (1-10) during access cavity preparation.

    Baseline/During the Operation

Study Arms (2)

infiltration anesthesia

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: infiltration anesthesia aloneProcedure: infiltration anesthesia combined with cryotherapy

mandibular anesthesia

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: mandibular anesthesia aloneProcedure: mandibular anesthesia combined with cryotherapy

Interventions

Local anesthesia was achieved using buccal infiltration with 2% lidocaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine.

infiltration anesthesia

Local anesthesia was achieved using mandibular block anesthesia with 2% lidocaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine.

mandibular anesthesia

Cryotherapy was applied immediately after completion of the anesthetic injection. Small ice packs wrapped in sterile gauze were placed intraorally on the buccal vestibular surface adjacent to the treated mandibular premolar. Patients were instructed to keep the ice pack in position for 5 minutes. In cases where extreme cold sensation or burning discomfort was reported, patients were asked to remove the ice pack for 1 minute before reapplication

infiltration anesthesia

Cryotherapy was applied immediately after completion of the anesthetic injection. Small ice packs wrapped in sterile gauze were placed intraorally on the buccal vestibular surface adjacent to the treated mandibular premolar. Patients were instructed to keep the ice pack in position for 5 minutes. In cases where extreme cold sensation or burning discomfort was reported, patients were asked to remove the ice pack for 1 minute before reapplication

mandibular anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Systemically healthy patients classified as ASA I or II, aged between 18 and 60 years,
  • Presence of a restorable mandibular premolar tooth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis,
  • History of spontaneous pain or lingering pain elicited by thermal stimuli,
  • Positive response with lingering pain to cold testing (Endo Ice; Coltene, Altstätten, Switzerland),
  • Positive response at low current levels to electric pulp testing (Parkell Inc., USA),
  • Teeth with closed apex and no radiographic evidence of periapical pathology (intact periodontal ligament space and absence of periapical radiolucency),
  • Patients presenting with moderate or severe preoperative pain, as assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS).

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who had taken analgesic, anti-inflammatory, or opioid medication within the last 12 hours before treatment,
  • Patients with systemic conditions that may affect pain perception, inflammatory response, or healing,
  • History of antibiotic use within the previous month or requirement for antibiotic prophylaxis,
  • Teeth presenting with clinical or radiographic signs of pulp necrosis or apical periodontitis (Pain on percussion or palpation, presence of sinus tract or swelling, presence of periapical radiolucency),
  • Teeth with root resorption, immature apices, severe coronal destruction preventing proper isolation, or calcified canals,
  • Teeth that had undergone previous endodontic treatment, including pulpotomy or root canal filling,
  • Patients with neurological or psychiatric conditions that could interfere with pain perception or accurate pain reporting,
  • Inability to achieve adequate isolation with a rubberdam.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Anesthesia, LocalCryotherapy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiaAnesthesia and AnalgesiaTherapeutics

Central Study Contacts

Ayşe Tuğba Eminsoy Avcı, Dentist

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2026

First Posted

February 11, 2026

Study Start

January 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

February 11, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share