NCT07401446

Brief Summary

This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. Eligible patients with incisional hernia were randomized into two parallel groups: sublay mesh repair and onlay mesh repair. Procedures were performed by a single experienced general surgeon. Postoperative complications were assessed by an independent surgeon blinded to the type of procedure. Patients were followed for a period of three months to evaluate safety and recurrence outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
350

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2020

Completed
5.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2025

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 15, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 16, 2026

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 10, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

February 10, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5.1 years

First QC Date

January 16, 2026

Last Update Submit

February 6, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

incisional HerniaMesh repairOnlay Mesh repairsublay Mesh Repair

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative Complication Rate

    Incidence of complications within 30 days after surgery, including wound infection, seroma, hematoma, and hernia recurrence, in patients undergoing onlay versus sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia.

    30 days after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Length of Hospital Stay

    Number of days From enrollment up to the hospital discharge

  • Hernia Recurrence Rate

    Assessed at 6 months and 12 months after surgery

  • Operative Time

    During the index surgical procedure (from skin incision to skin closure)

Study Arms (2)

Sublay Mesh Repair

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients underwent open incisional hernia repair with placement of polypropylene mesh in the retromuscular preperitoneal (sublay) plane.

Procedure: Sublay Mesh Repair

Onlay Mesh Repair

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients underwent open incisional hernia repair with placement of polypropylene mesh over the anterior rectus sheath (onlay technique).

Procedure: Onlay Mesh Repair

Interventions

Patients underwent open incisional hernia repair with placement of polypropylene mesh in the retromuscular preperitoneal (sublay) plane.

Sublay Mesh Repair

Placement of polypropylene mesh over the anterior rectus sheath during open incisional hernia repair.

Onlay Mesh Repair

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 18-60 years.
  • Patients diagnosed with primary incisional hernia on clinical examination.
  • Hernia suitable for open surgical repair with mesh.
  • Both male and female patients.
  • Patients able and willing to provide written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Obstructed or strangulated hernia on presentation.
  • Recurrent incisional hernia.
  • Patients with BMI \> 40.
  • Patients with debilitating chronic diseases, including:
  • Chronic liver disease
  • Chronic renal impairment
  • Chronic cardiac disease
  • Chronic pulmonary disease
  • Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status ≥ 3.
  • Patients unfit for general anesthesia.
  • Patients unable or unwilling to follow up for postoperative assessment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hayatabad Medical Complex

Peshawar, KPK, 25000, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):578-83; discussion 583-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000141193.08524.e7.

  • Walming S, Angenete E, Block M, Bock D, Gessler B, Haglind E. Retrospective review of risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. BMC Surg. 2017 Feb 22;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0207-0.

  • Pereira C, Gururaj S. Onlay Versus Sublay Mesh Repair for Incisional Hernias: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2023 Jan 24;15(1):e34156. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34156. eCollection 2023 Jan.

  • Kohler A, Beldi G. [Recurrence after hernia surgery: complication or natural course?] Chirurg. 2014 Feb;85(2):112-6.

    RESULT
  • Rayman S, Gorgov E, Assaf D, Carmeli I, Nevo N, Rachmuth J, Mnouskin Y. Quality of life, post-operative complications, and hernia recurrence following enhanced-view Totally Extra-Peritoneal (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa for incisional and primary ventral hernia repair. Updates Surg. 2023 Oct;75(7):1971-1978. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01572-x. Epub 2023 Jun 28.

  • Omar I, Zaimis T, Townsend A, Ismaiel M, Wilson J, Magee C. Incisional Hernia: A Surgical Complication or Medical Disease? Cureus. 2023 Dec 15;15(12):e50568. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50568. eCollection 2023 Dec.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HerniaHernia, AbdominalIncisional Hernia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic Processes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
This was an open-label study. Due to the nature of the surgical interventions, neither participants nor healthcare providers nor outcome assessors were blinded to the assigned intervention.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study uses a parallel group randomized design in which eligible participants were randomly assigned to one of two intervention arms. One group underwent sublay mesh repair, and the other group underwent onlay mesh repair for incisional hernia. Participants received only the intervention assigned to their group, and outcomes were compared between the two groups over a three-month follow-up period.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2026

First Posted

February 10, 2026

Study Start

August 1, 2020

Primary Completion

August 31, 2025

Study Completion

September 15, 2025

Last Updated

February 10, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations