Plant-based Versus Animal-based Oral Nutritional Supplements
PAVOS
PlAnt Vs Animal Based Oral Nutritional Supplements: Patients' Opinions and Nutritional Outcomes: A Multicenter Pilot Feasibility Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background information: Many people who are admitted to the hospital are at risk of malnutrition. In some patient groups, this can be as high as 40%. When someone is not eating enough, the dietitian often recommends oral nutritional supplements (ONS). These are energy- and protein-rich drinks that help patients get enough nutrition. They can reduce complications, lower the chance of being readmitted to the hospital, and help improve body weight and physical functioning. In the Netherlands, the Ministry of Health and the Dutch Federation of University Medical Centers have signed the Green Deal "Working together on sustainable care." One of the goals is to make healthcare greener and climate-neutral by 2026. This also applies to medical and non-medical nutrition, including ONS. Because of this, there is increasing attention on developing ONS that contain more plant-based proteins, which may be more sustainable. What do will the investigators find out? It is unknown how plant-based ONS work when patients use them for a longer period of time. For example:
- Do they help patients get enough energy and protein?
- What are the effects on physical and clinical outcomes? Before a large study with many patients is started, it is important to first test whether this type of research is feasible. Feasibility in terms of
- Recruitment rate
- Drop-out rate
- Adherence to the ONS advice
- Study measurements (succesfull vs unsuccesfull measurements) To answer these questions, a smaller pilot study will be conducted in which plant-based ONS will be compared to animal-based ONS. What does this study look like? Inclusion criteria: Patients from the departments of medical oncology, lung diseases, cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, and orthopedics at Maastricht UMC+ and Radboudumc. These are patients who are currently not eating enough. These patients receive advice from the dietitian to take at least two bottles of ONS per day. If they want to participate in the study, they will be randomly assigned to one of two products:
- Animal-based (milk protein): Fresubin YoDrink Raspberry©
- Plant-based (soy protein): Fresubin Plant-Based Drink Vanilla© Measurements will be performed at the start of the study and again after three months. In the meantime, the researcher will contact the patient twice by phone to ask how things are going.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2025
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
February 17, 2026
December 1, 2025
10 months
December 18, 2025
February 11, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Feasibility of a multicenter RNIT study, assessed by recruitment rate defined as the percentage of patients who participated versus total numer of eligible patients.
Recruitment rate, defined as the proportion of patients who participate relative to the total number of eligible patients who are approached for participation. The recruitment rate will be calculated as the number of included participants divided by the number of approached eligible patients and will be reported as a percentage.
From enrollment to the end of the study (three months after inclusion)
Feasibility of a multicenter RNIT study, assessed by drop-out rate, percentage of participants who discontinue the study.
Drop-out rate is defined as the percentage of participants who discontinue the study, the timing of drop-out, and the reported reasons for drop-out.
From enrollment to end of study (three months after inclusion)
Feasibility of a multicenter RNIT study, assessed by adherence to oral nutritional supplements (ONS). Percentage of the prescribed ONS intake that is acutally consumed over the study period.
Adherence feasibility will be assessed using a daily logbook in which participants record the amount of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) consumed each day relative to the prescribed amount. Adherence will be calculated as the percentage of the prescribed ONS intake that is actually consumed over the study period.
From enrollment to the end of the study (three months after inclusion)
Feasibility of study measurements, percentage of successfully completed study measurements.
Feasibility of study measurements will be assessed by the percentage of successfully completed study measurements and the reported reasons for unsuccessful measurements.
From enrollment to the end of the study (three months after inclusion)
Secondary Outcomes (25)
Energy intake (kcal/day) assessed by self-administered 3-day food diary
At the start of the study (directly after inclusion) and three months after inclusion
Protein intake (g/day) assessed by self-administered 3-day food diary
At the start of the study (directly after inclusion) and three months after inclusion
Protein intake (g/kg/day) assessed by self-administered 3-day food diary
At the start of the study (directly after inclusion) and three months after inclusion
Protein intake (g/kg fat free mass/day) assessed by self-administered 3-day food diary
At the start of the study (directly after inclusion) and three months after inclusion
Body weight (kg)
At the start of the study (directly after inclusion) and three months after inclusion
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Plant-based ONS
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, patients who are advised, as part of usual care, to use at least two bottles of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) per day are randomized to the plant-based group. Participants receive plant-based ONS, with the daily amount prescribed by the dietitian according to usual care.
Animal-based ONS
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, patients who are advised, as part of usual care, to use at least two bottles of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) per day are randomized to the animal-based group. Participants receive animal-based ONS, with the daily amount prescribed by the dietitian according to usual care.
Interventions
Patients will receive animal-based oral nutritional supplements (ONS). The amount of bottles ONS a day, will be based on their nutritional intake versus requirements by a dietitian. This is usual care, only the sort of ONS differs from normal care.
Patients will receive plant-based oral nutritional supplements (ONS). The amount of bottles ONS a day, will be based on their nutritional intake versus requirements by a dietitian. This is usual care, only the sort of ONS differs from normal care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical patients with cancer and lung diseases, cardiology patients, patients with cardiothoracic surgery, and orthopaedic patients age ≥18 years, and treated at Radboudumc or Maastricht UMC+.
- Patients who have been advised at least 2 bottles of ONS daily based on a high risk of malnutrition (MUST≥2, PG-SGA-SF≥ 9) and/or by the dietitians expertise.
- Written informed consent (IC)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are or become dependent on tube or parenteral nutrition
- Patients where life-extending therapy is no longer possible
- Unable to follow up study instructions
- Lactose intolerance
- Soy allergy/intolerance
- Vegan diet
- Patients who have used ONS in the past six months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radboud University Medical Centerlead
- Fresenius Kabicollaborator
- Maastricht University Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Radboud university medical center
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 GA, Netherlands
Maastricht University Medical Center
Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX, Netherlands
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maud Reintjes, MSc
Radboud University Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2025
First Posted
February 10, 2026
Study Start
November 10, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- start date: after finishing inclusion. end date: 15 years thereafter
- Access Criteria
- Other researchers from Radboudumc and Maastricht UMC will have access to the patients' measurement data in an anonymized form. In consultation with the principal investigator/supervisor, the data's relevance to other research will be discussed. Agreements will then be made regarding data sharing. They will only see the study number assigned to each patient and the measurement outcomes. The data cannot be traced back to individual patients. Data will be made accessible for other research through the 'DRE' program.
Patients will be asked in the informed consent form whether they agree to the possibility that their measurement data may be shared anonymously for future research. If the patient provides consent and the data are relevant to other studies, these anonymized data may be made available to other researchers.