Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Materials
Bioactive
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the performance of three different bioactive restorative materials against a composite resin for a period of 9 months. This randomized, split-mouth, single-center trial was performed on patients having occlusal caries (ICDAS 3 and 4) in both molars of the same jaw. The restorative materials used were Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill (control, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein), Stela (SDI, Australia), Cention Forte (Ivoclar) and Activa BioActive Restorative (Pulpdent, USA). The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 3-6 and 9-month according to FDI-2 criteria, in terms of functional, biological, and aesthetic parameters, by two experienced evaluators.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
ExpectedFebruary 6, 2026
February 1, 2026
5 months
January 30, 2026
February 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
FDI-2 evaluation criteria for functional properties
Clinical evaluations were conducted using the FDI-2 criteria by two experienced, calibrated, and blinded evaluators for functional properties (category F). fracture/displacement of the material, marginal adaptation, form and contour, occlusion, and wear) were scored. Scores of 1-3 indicate clinically acceptable and successful restorations, score 4 indicates clinically inadequate but repairable defects, and score 5 represents clinically unacceptable restorations.
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
FDI-2 evaluation criteria for biological properties
2 years
Other Outcomes (1)
FDI-2 evaluation criteria for aesthetic properties
2 years
Study Arms (4)
Tetric N-Ceram BulkFill
ACTIVE COMPARATORTetric N-Ceram Bulkfill application (control group; device 1) was randomly applied to patients.
Cention Forte
ACTIVE COMPARATORCention Forte was randomly applied to patients.
Stela Automix
ACTIVE COMPARATORStela automix was randomly applied to patients.
Activa BioActive Restorative
ACTIVE COMPARATORActiva BioActive Restorative was randomly applied to patients.
Interventions
Selective enamel etching was performed with 37% phosphoric acid followed by a universal adhesive system application to all cavity surfaces and LED cured. The bulk-fill composite resin was placed in a single increment according to the manufacturer's recommendations and light-cured for 20 seconds. Excess material was removed using flame-shaped diamond finishing burs. Occlusion was assessed with articulation paper, and premature or undesirable contact points were adjusted as necessary.
A drop of Cention Primer was mixed in its wheel for 5 seconds and actively applied to the cavity for 10 seconds, followed by gentle air-drying. The Cention Forte capsule was then mixed for 15 seconds in a capsule mixer and placed in bulk into the prepared cavity using the manufacturer's delivery gun. Light curing was performed for 20 seconds with an LED unit (1300 mW/cm²; ZenoLite, President, Germany). Excess material was removed using flame-shaped diamond finishing burs. Occlusion was assessed with articulation paper, and any premature or undesirable contact points were adjusted accordingly. Final polishing was performed with OptraGloss polishing wheels (Ivoclar Vivadent) for 20 seconds.
Stela Primer was applied to the cavity surfaces and margins for 10 seconds. After a 5-second waiting period, the primer was gently air-dried for 2-3 seconds. The Stela Automix injector tip was then angled as needed and inserted into the cavity to deliver the material. The restoration was allowed to self-cure for 4 minutes. Occlusion was evaluated using articulation paper, and any premature or undesired contact points were adjusted as necessary. Final polishing was performed with OptraGloss polishing wheels (Ivoclar Vivadent) for 20 seconds.
Selective enamel etching was performed with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds, followed by thorough rinsing and air-drying. A universal adhesive system (Tetric N-Bond Universal, Ivoclar Vivadent) was applied to all cavity surfaces, including enamel, for 20 seconds, air-thinned, and light-cured for 20 seconds using an LED unit (1300 mW/cm²; ZenoLite, President, Germany). Following the manufacturer's instructions, the placement tip was inserted into the cavity using the dedicated placement gun, and the material was delivered in bulk. Light curing was performed for 20 seconds. Excess material was removed using flame-shaped diamond finishing burs. Occlusion was assessed with articulation paper, and premature or undesirable contact points were adjusted as needed. Final polishing was performed with OptraGloss polishing wheels (Ivoclar Vivadent) for 20 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals over the age of 16 with permanent dentition
- Individuals with a total of four vital molar teeth requiring restoration (ICDAS 3-4), two on each side of the same jaw
- Individuals with posterior contact with antagonist teeth
- Individuals who are reliable, cooperative, and willing to participate in periodic follow-ups
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals whose antagonist teeth were missing or have crowns, bridges, etc.
- Individuals with history of alcohol, drug, or medication addiction.
- Individuals with pulp exposure during cavity preparation or a cavity depth exceeding 2-4 mm.
- Individuals known to be unable to attend follow-up appointments.
- Individuals with allergies to the products used in the procedure.
- Individuals with severe tooth grinding or bruxism.
- Individuals with caries conditions classified as ICDAS 5 and 6.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding individuals and individuals planning pregnancy during the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ege Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Ege University School of Dentistry
Izmir, Bornova, 35100, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cankut Canevi, DDS
Ege University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2026
First Posted
February 6, 2026
Study Start
November 1, 2024
Primary Completion
April 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share