In Vivo Pulp Thermal Changes During Different Slenderization Techniques
IPR
Pulp Temperature Elevation During Interproximal Reduction: An In Vivo Quantification of Temperature Changes Across Different Slenderization Methods
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to learn about the temperature rise inside the living part of a tooth (the pulp) during different ways of removing a small amount of enamel (the hard outer layer of the tooth), a procedure called Interproximal Enamel Reduction (IPR). The goal of this study is to learn about the temperature rise inside the living part of a tooth (the pulp) during different ways of removing a small amount of enamel (the hard outer layer of the tooth), a procedure called Interproximal Enamel Reduction (IPR). The main question it aims to answer is: Which IPR technique causes the highest temperature rise in the live tooth pulp? This study is important because, until now, no research has measured these temperature changes in the live pulp of teeth inside a person's mouth (in vivo) that includes both premolars and front teeth (incisors). The original studies only used premolars, and the results might be different for front teeth due to the difference in enamel thickness. Researchers will use 20 premolar teeth and 20 incisors that will be scheduled for extraction as part of orthodontic treatment. The teeth will be divided into two groups based on the IPR method used: Group 1: IPR using a high-speed air-driven drill (airotor) and bur. Group 2: IPR using an orthodontic IPR kit (an oscillating system). Participants will: Receive local anesthesia to numb the tooth. Have the baseline temperature of the pulp recorded using temperature sensor on either side of the teeth. Have the temperature changes in the pulp recorded using temperature sensor while IPR is performed on the sides of the tooth. Have the tooth extracted afterward (as part of original orthodontic plan) The key findings may provide information of the IPR method that cause a temperature rise high enough to harm the pulp. A rise beyond 5.5∘C may cause pulp damage.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 29, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 29, 2026
February 17, 2026
February 1, 2026
2.1 years
September 30, 2025
February 13, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The highest temperature reached inside the pulp chamber for each tooth during the IPR procedure
The highest temperature reached inside the pulp chamber for each tooth during the IPR procedure will be recorded using temperature sensor keeping it on the mid, mesial and distal facial surfaces of the tooth at different tie points; T0 (prior to IPR procedure), TD (during IPR procedure with the techniques specified) T1 (immediately after IPR), and T2 (after 5 mins post IPR)
From enrollment to the date of planned extraction of the patient's teeth at 8 weeks so that all the measurements can be taken from T0 to T2 [T0 (prior to IPR procedure), TD (during IPR procedure with the techniques specified) T1 (immediately after IPR)]
Mean maximum temperature rise per IPR technique
Description: The calculated average of the maximum temperature rise for all teeth treated with a specific IPR technique. Analysis: This measure will be broken down by IPR technique and by tooth type (incisors vs. premolars). Conclusion: The method that consistently produces the lowest mean temperature rise across all groups is considered the most thermally conservative method.
from enrollment to the point of extraction of patient's teeth at 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Residual Pulp Temperature Difference at 5 Minutes Post-IPR
From enrollment to the date of planned extraction of the patient's teeth at 8 weeks so that all the measurements can be taken from T0 to T2 [T0 (prior to IPR procedure), TD (during IPR procedure with the techniques specified) T1 (immediately after IPR)]
Study Arms (2)
Premolar Group
EXPERIMENTALBilateral premolars planned for extraction as part of orthodontic treatment in a patient will undergo intervention using both the IPR methods to measure the changes in pup temperature. First baseline temperature wil be recorded intraorally then one side premolar (e.g; right) will undergo IPR using Air-rotor system and then the other side premolar (e.g; left) will undergo IPR using oscillating strip
Incisor Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients planned for lower single incisor extraction will be divided into two groups and undergo IPR using two different IPR techniques intraorally prior to extraction of the tooth.
Interventions
This technique operates at a much lower speed (around 5,000 RPM) and is expected to result in a moderate temperature increase, presenting a moderate possibility of thermal effect compared to the high-speed drill during interproximal reduction.
This method involves high rotational speed (potentially over 300,000 RPM) and thus has the highest possibility of causing the greatest temperature elevation due to intense friction during interproximal reduction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants 12 to 25 years of age.
- Participants undergoing orthodontic treatment requiring extraction of the teeth being studied (Incisors or Premolars).
- Selected tooth must be intact (no decay, large fillings, or fractures).
- Tooth must test vital (alive and healthy) prior to the procedure.
- Tooth must have healthy surrounding gum tissue.
You may not qualify if:
- Teeth that are non-vital (dead), have root canal treatment, or signs of irreversible pulpitis.
- Teeth with existing large or deep restorations (fillings) or crowns/veneers.
- Teeth that have undergone any previous IPR or stripping procedure.
- Teeth with significant developmental enamel defects (e.g., severe hypoplasia or fluorosis).
- Participants with severe systemic diseases (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes) affecting dental health.
- Participants taking medications that affect pulp sensation or vascular response (e.g., long-term anti-inflammatories).
- Participants who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Armed Forces Intitute of Denistry (AFID), Combined Military Hospital (CMH)
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 44000, Pakistan
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alaina Tariq Mughal, BDS, FCPS (R)
Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2025
First Posted
February 5, 2026
Study Start
September 29, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 29, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 29, 2026
Last Updated
February 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02