Palm Stimulator Use During Peripheral Venous Catheterization
The Effect of Palm Stimulator Use During Peripheral Venous Catheterization on Pain, Fear, and Procedural Satisfaction in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a "Palm Stimulator" (a handheld device with blunt protrusions) in reducing pain, fear, and anxiety during peripheral venous catheterization (IV insertion) in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Methods: This is a randomized controlled clinical trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the Experimental Group or the Control Group. Experimental Group: During the IV insertion process, patients will hold and squeeze the Palm Stimulator in the palm of their non-procedural hand. The device is designed to provide intense tactile (touch) stimulation based on the "Gate Control Theory." Control Group: Patients will receive the standard routine care for IV insertion without any additional intervention. Data Collection: Pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while fear and anxiety levels will be assessed through VAS scales before and after the procedure. Patient satisfaction with the device will also be recorded. Expected Outcome: The investigators hypothesize that the use of the Palm Stimulator will significantly decrease procedural pain and fear while increasing patient satisfaction compared to standard care. This study aims to provide a low-cost, non-pharmacological, and easy-to-use tool for oncology nurses to improve patient comfort during invasive procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 20, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2026
February 6, 2026
February 1, 2026
3 months
January 28, 2026
February 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Procedural Pain Intensity
Procedural pain intensity will be measured using a 10-centimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "unbearable pain."
Within 1 minute after the completion of the peripheral venous catheterization procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Level of Procedural Fear
Immediately before the procedure and within 1 minute after the procedure.
Patient Satisfaction With the Procedure
Within 1 minute after the completion of the procedure.
Other Outcomes (1)
Satisfaction With the Palm Stimulator
Within 5 minutes after the procedure.
Study Arms (2)
Palm Stimulator Group
EXPERIMENTAL1-2 minutes before the procedure, patients will receive a brief orientation regarding the device. 20 seconds before PVC insertion, the device will be placed in the palm of the non-procedural hand. Patients will grip the device as the nurse applies the tourniquet. The tactile stimulation will continue throughout the needle entry and catheter stabilization.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants will receive the standard routine PVC protocol. No additional intervention will be provided during the procedure.
Interventions
1-2 minutes before the procedure, patients will receive a brief orientation regarding the device. 20 seconds before PVC insertion, the device will be placed in the palm of the non-procedural hand. Patients will grip the device as the nurse applies the tourniquet. The tactile stimulation will continue throughout the needle entry and catheter stabilization.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-65 years.
- Receiving chemotherapy treatment via peripheral venous catheter (PVC).
- Cognitively capable of communicating and responding to pain, fear, and satisfaction scales.
- Volunteering to participate and providing written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy or diabetic neuropathy.
- Presence of active infection, open wound, scar tissue, or edema in the palm.
- Use of analgesic medication within 4-6 hours before the procedure.
- History of hemiplegia or movement restriction in the extremity to be used for the procedure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Zeliha CENGİZlead
Study Sites (1)
Turgut Ozal Medical Center
Malatya, Malatya, 44000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Zengin M, Yayan EH. A Comparison of Two Different Tactile Stimulus Methods on Reducing Pain of Children During Intramuscular Injection: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Emerg Nurs. 2022 Mar;48(2):167-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
PMID: 34952709BACKGROUNDKapucu S, Ozkaraman AO, Uysal N, Bagcivan G, Seref FC, Eloz A. Knowledge Level on Administration of Chemotherapy through Peripheral and Central Venous Catheter among Oncology Nurses. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Jan-Mar;4(1):61-68. doi: 10.4103/2347-5625.199081.
PMID: 28217732BACKGROUNDDuggan C, Hernon O, Dunne R, McInerney V, Walsh SR, Lowery A, McCarthy M, Carr PJ. Vascular access device type for systemic anti-cancer therapies in cancer patients: A scoping review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024 Apr;196:104277. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104277. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
PMID: 38492760BACKGROUNDSung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
PMID: 33538338BACKGROUNDOzirmak N, Yayan EH. The difference between site of application and pain relief efficacy of the palm stimulator: A randomised controlled trial of intravenous blood drawn in children. J Pediatr Nurs. 2026 Jan-Feb;86:315-323. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2025.11.022. Epub 2025 Nov 24.
PMID: 41289974BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2026
First Posted
February 4, 2026
Study Start
February 20, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 30, 2026
Last Updated
February 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will not be shared with third parties or publicly to ensure the full protection of patient privacy and confidentiality, in accordance with the Law on the Protection of Personal Data (KVKK) and institutional ethical guidelines. The informed consent obtained from the participants does not include permission for the public sharing of raw individual data. Only de-identified, aggregated study results and statistical summaries will be presented through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations to contribute to the scientific literature.