NCT07387042

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) versus laparoscopic Hill-Snow repair (LHS) in the management of patients with congenital hiatus hernia, to evaluate the role of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the preoperative diagnosis and planning \& to determine the utility of intraoperative endoscopy in guiding the surgical repair and ensuring its technical adequacy. main questions are:

  • which one of these techniques is safer with higher clinical efficacy represented by relief of GERD symptoms ?
  • does upper GI endoscopy have a role in preoperative stage regarding diagnosis of condition and planning of treatment ?
  • does upper GI endoscopy have a role in intraoperative stage regarding guiding the surgical repair and ensuring its adequacy ? all participants will be randomly assigned in one of two groups:
  • one group undergoing Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication
  • the other group undergoing Laparoscopic Hill-Snow repair each participsant will have preopertive, intraoperative and postoperative upper GI endoscopy to assess objectively clinical efficacy of both techniques and to define the integral role of endoscopy in all three perioperative stages

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
17mo left

Started Mar 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress12%
Mar 2026Oct 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 28, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 4, 2026

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2026

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2027

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 4, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

January 28, 2026

Last Update Submit

January 28, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Hiatus HerniaNissen FundoplicationHill-Snow repairEndoscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Degree of relief of GERD symptoms assessed by GERD Health-Related Quality Of Life (GERD-HRQL) score

    The GERD-HRQL questionnaire was developed and validated to measure changes of typical GERD symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation in response to surgical or medical treatment. Total Score: Calculated by summing the individual scores to 15 questions \* Greatest possible score (worst symptoms) = 75 \* Lowest possible score (no symptoms) = 0 Heartburn Score: Calculated by summing the individual scores to 6 questions \* Worst heartburn symptoms = 30 \* No heartburn symptoms = 0 \* Scores less than or equal to 12 with each individual question not exceeding 2 indicate heartburn elimination. Regurgitation Score: Calculated by summing the individual scores to 6 questions . \*Worst regurgitation symptoms = 30 \* No regurgitation = 0 \* Scores less than or equal to 12 with each individual question not exceeding 2 indicate regurgitation.

    6 months postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Laparoscopic Hill-Snow repair

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: Laparoscopic Hill-Snow repair

Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication

Interventions

a laparoscopic surgical operation to fix severe acid reflux (GERD) and hiatal hernias by restoring the natural anti-reflux mechanism,acting as an alternative to the more common Nissen fundoplication, It's known for firmly anchoring the stomach to reliable structures, creating a flap valve, and reducing recurrence What it does * Reduces hiatal hernia: Pulls down the stomach that has slipped into the chest. * Recreates valve: Re-establishes the angle of His (the valve between the esophagus and stomach). * Secures the junction: Sews the lower esophagus and stomach to the diaphragm and abdominal structures, preventing reflux How it works (basic steps) Dissect: Free the esophagus and pull down the herniated stomach. Repair hernia: Close the opening (hiatus) in the diaphragm (cruroplasty). Fix stomach: Sew the stomach (fundus) to the esophagus and diaphragm (gastropexy). Create angle: Recreate the angle of His with sutures

Laparoscopic Hill-Snow repair

a minimally invasive keyhole surgery that treats severe acid reflux (GERD) by wrapping the upper part of the stomach (fundus) around the lower esophagus to create a stronger valve, preventing stomach acid from traveling up. Performed through small incisions, it's a more permanent solution than medication, often used when lifestyle changes and drugs fail, and involves a quicker recovery than traditional open surgery. How it works Reinforces the valve: The stomach's fundus is wrapped around the esophagus, strengthening the natural anti-reflux barrier. Stops acid flow: This "wrap" stops stomach acid and enzymes from splashing back into the esophagus. Corrects hiatal hernia: If present, a hiatal hernia (when part of the stomach pushes through the diaphragm) is also repaired during the procedure.

Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged less than 18 years including both sexes with a confirmed diagnosis of congenital hiatus hernia
  • Diagnosis of hiatus hernia refractory to maximal medical therapy (PPI for ≥12 weeks) AND/OR presence of complications (e.g., erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, recurrent aspiration pneumonia, failure to thrive)
  • Objective evidence of pathological GERD on upper endoscopy e.g: erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus.

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous esophageal or gastric surgery
  • Contraindications to laparoscopy e.g: cardiopulmonary decompensated cases.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery University Hospital, Faculty Of Medicine, Minia Universty

Minya, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Gyawali, C. P., Kahrilas, P. J., Savarino, E., Zerbib, F., Mion, F., Smout, A. J., ... & Sifrim, D. (2018). Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus. Gut, 67(7), 1351-1362

    BACKGROUND
  • Mönig, S. P., & Hölscher, A. H. (2006). Intraoperative endoscopy. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 391(2), 99-104.

    BACKGROUND
  • Spechler, S. J., & Hunter, J. G. (2017). A Modern View of Hiatal Hernia: Lessons from Surgical and Gastroenterologic Literature. Gastroenterology, 153(4), 911-914.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hill, L. D., & Snow, L. L. (1999). The Hill-Snow repair for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgical Clinics of North America.

    BACKGROUND
  • Nissen, R. (1956). Eine einfache Operation zur Beeinflussung der Refluxoesophagitis. Schweiz Med Wochenschr.

    BACKGROUND
  • Stefanidis, D., Hope, W. W., Kohn, G. P., Reardon, P. R., Richardson, W. S., & Fanelli, R. D. (2010). Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgical Endoscopy, 24(11), 2647-2669.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hyun, J. J., & Bak, Y. T. (2011). Clinical Significance of Hiatal Hernia. The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology, 57(3), 160-165.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Hiatal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hernia, DiaphragmaticInternal HerniaHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Alaa A El sayed

    Minia University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Mohamed H Hamdy, Master

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistrent Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2026

First Posted

February 4, 2026

Study Start

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 4, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations