Mesh Design for Open Inguinal Hernia
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Inguinal hernia repair is the most common operation performed by general surgeons worldwide, surgical repair is the only established definitive treatment for inguinal hernia with multiple variable described approaches, Since Lichtenstein and his colleagues pronounced the use of mesh in tension-free inguinal hernia repair, the open Lichtenstein mesh repair of inguinal hernia became a standard of care for inguinal hernia repair due to easiness of performance with low recurrence rates (1, 2, 3). In the past many different factors have been identified to reduce chronic postoperative inguinal pain CPIP, Sophisticated studies suggested that mechanical mesh fixation should be avoided, and proper knowledge of inguinal nerves is essential (4-9). Surgeons must consider patient characteristics and mesh properties when selecting a mesh for hernia treatment. Mechanical compatibility between meshes and abdominal wall layers is crucial for avoiding complications. Lightweight, monofilament meshes with large pores and minimal surface area are ideal; however, the surgeon should never forget that the way the mesh is positioned as important as the type of mesh used. Despite the new materials available, surgical skill still has a major role in preventing hernia post-operative complications and recurrence. Future research will continue to focus on the surgical techniques and biomaterials to achieve the best outcomes (10). Our method uses a smaller single mesh that covers all weaknesses in the inguinal canal and is covered with a fibro-cremasteric sheath to prevent the prosthesis from coming into touch with neural processes. This method is applicable to all cases of primary inguinal hernia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2026
CompletedFebruary 4, 2026
January 1, 2026
1 year
January 27, 2026
January 27, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
hernia recurrence
The rate of return of the hernia in the same location.
6 months following the operation
Study Arms (1)
hernia arm represent patients with inguinal hernia
EXPERIMENTALthe new mesh desined to fit the posterior wall of inguinal canal
Interventions
the new mesh design is cut to fit the posterior wall of the inguinal canal
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- males older than 18 years old with primary inguinal hernia.
You may not qualify if:
- females patients with bleeding tendency.
- Complicated inguinal hernia.
- Huge inguinoscrotal hernia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zagazig Univeesity Hospitals
Zagazig, 44519, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assisstant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2026
First Posted
February 4, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion
January 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share