NCT07380126

Brief Summary

The present study will evaluate and compare the effect of functional CL and DME in the treatment of posterior teeth with class II caries clinically and on the level of TNF-α in the GCF of treated teeth. Clinical evaluation of periodontal tissue in the form of probing depth as a primary outcome, clinical attachment level, plaque index, bleeding index, gingival index, pink aesthetic score, Radiographic evaluation of biological width and the level of TNF-α in the GCF as a secondary outcome.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
5mo left

Started Feb 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress40%
Feb 2026Oct 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 24, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2026

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 2, 2026

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2026

Last Updated

February 2, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

January 24, 2026

Last Update Submit

January 24, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Functional Crown lengtheningDeep Margin ElevationTNF-α

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Probing depth

    Will be measured from the gingival margin to the depth of the pocket at four points (mesio-facial, mid-facial, disto-facial and mid-lingual) to the nearest millimeter using UNC-15 periodontal probe. The average of the three facial points will be recorded as the facial probing depth (FPD), while the mid-lingual point will be recorded as the lingual probing depth.

    Clinical measurements preoperative and will be repeated at 1, 3, and 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Biochemical evaluation

    Biochemical measurements preoperative and will be repeated at 1, 3 and 6 months

Study Arms (2)

Functional crown lengthening

EXPERIMENTAL

patients will undergo functional crown lengthening by raising a full thickness flap with osseous resection to establish a distance of 3 mm between the cervical margin of the cavity and the bone crest. Osteoplasty was performed in the adjacent and neighboring tooth surfaces to accomplish a smooth bone contour. The flaps will then be sutured in their new position

Procedure: Functional Crown lengthening

Deep Margin Elevation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

patients will undergo deep margin elevation through a two-step direct restoration performed using the concepts of Progressive Matrixing and Wedging where the Deep subgingival cavity margin will be acquired. Then isolation by rubber dam. A curved matrix will seal the margin without any gingival or rubber dam entrapped in between. One step adhesive system will be performed under rubber dam isolation. Composite resin base is applied to raise the margin by about 2 mm. A bulk fill packable or flowable composite can be used. Finishing will be done using polishing strips and disks. Finally a bitewing radiograph will be taken to check the presence of overhangs or gaps before the final restoration.

Procedure: Deep Margin Elevation

Interventions

patients will undergo functional crown lengthening by raising a full thickness flap with osseous resection to establish a distance of 3 mm between the cervical margin of the cavity and the bone crest. Osteoplasty was performed in the adjacent and neighboring tooth surfaces to accomplish a smooth bone contour. The flaps will then be sutured in their new position

Functional crown lengthening

patients will undergo deep margin elevation through a two-step direct restoration performed using the concepts of Progressive Matrixing and Wedging where the Deep subgingival cavity margin will be acquired. Then isolation by rubber dam. A curved matrix will seal the margin without any gingival or rubber dam entrapped in between. One step adhesive system will be performed under rubber dam isolation. Composite resin base is applied to raise the margin by about 2 mm. A bulk fill packable or flowable composite can be used. Finishing will be done using polishing strips and disks. Finally a bitewing radiograph will be taken to check the presence of overhangs or gaps before the final restoration.

Deep Margin Elevation

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 20-50 years
  • Both genders
  • Patients free from any systemic disease that may affect the treatment (Greenberg \& Glick, 2012)
  • Patients with intact periodontium
  • Patients are ready to comply with oral hygiene measures.
  • Patients having Posterior teeth with carious cavities and/ or restorations in need of replacement on proximal surfaces, where the cervical margin of the cavity is at a distance less than 3 mm to the bone crest (Cyana et al.,2013).
  • Patients with thick phenotype having gingival thickness \> 1mm (Aimetti et al,2008).
  • Patients with keratinized tissue width ≥ 2mm

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant and lactating females
  • Smokers
  • Drug abusers.
  • Patients with persistent poor oral hygiene
  • Patients with proximal margins beyond the bone level
  • Patients with developmental dental anomalies
  • Patients undergoing or will start orthodontic treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Padbury A Jr, Eber R, Wang HL. Interactions between the gingiva and the margin of restorations. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 May;30(5):379-85. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.01277.x.

    PMID: 12716328BACKGROUND
  • Aimetti M, Massei G, Morra M, Cardesi E, Romano F. Correlation between gingival phenotype and Schneiderian membrane thickness. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(6):1128-32.

    PMID: 19216284BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Doaa A. Khattab, Associate Professor

    Faculty of Dentistry - Ain shams university

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Mahmoud A. Ezz, Bachelor

CONTACT

Hadeel G. Al Malahy, Associate Professor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2026

First Posted

February 2, 2026

Study Start

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Last Updated

February 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01