External Oblique Intercostal Block vs Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effects of the external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on postoperative analgesia in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Both EOIB and ESPB are ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques currently used in clinical practice to improve postoperative pain control as part of multimodal analgesia strategies. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common minimally invasive surgical procedure; however, patients may still experience postoperative pain that can increase opioid consumption and delay recovery. Identifying the most effective regional anesthesia technique may improve postoperative analgesia and patient recovery. In this study, eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either bilateral EOIB or bilateral ESPB in addition to standardized general anesthesia and postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. Postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, quality of recovery, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and block-related complications will be evaluated during the first 24 hours after surgery. The study aims to provide comparative clinical evidence regarding the analgesic effectiveness of these two regional anesthesia techniques.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 15, 2026
CompletedJanuary 30, 2026
January 1, 2026
3 months
January 21, 2026
January 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
24-hour cumulative opioid consumption
Total opioid consumption within the first 24 hours, including PCA-administered morphine and rescue analgesics converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME).
postoperative day 1
Secondary Outcomes (9)
12-hour cumulative opioid consumption
postoperative 12th hour
Postoperative pain scores (NRS at rest)
postoperative day 1
Postoperative pain scores (NRS during activity)
postoperative day 1
Patient-reported quality of recovery (QoR-15 score)
postoperative day 1
Postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence (PONV)
Postoperative day 1
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group EOIB
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients allocated to the EOIB group will be transferred to the regional anesthesia area and monitored approximately 45 minutes before surgery. With the patient in the supine position, bilateral ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) will be performed. A total volume of 60 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (30 mL per side) will be injected. General anesthesia will then be administered according to standard practice. In the postoperative period, additional analgesia will be provided using intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).
Group ESPB
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients allocated to the ESPB group will be transferred to the regional anesthesia area and monitored approximately 45 minutes before surgery. With the patient in the supine position, bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) will be performed. A total volume of 60 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (30 mL per side) will be injected. General anesthesia will then be administered according to standard practice. In the postoperative period, additional analgesia will be provided using intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).
Interventions
Bilateral ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal block performed approximately 45 minutes before surgery. A total of 60 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (30 mL per side) is injected into the fascial plane deep to the external oblique muscle.
Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block performed approximately 45 minutes before surgery. A total of 60 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (30 mL per side) is injected into the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle at the thoracic level under ultrasound guidance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 80 years
- Scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
- Ability to understand and operate a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device
- Provision of written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- History of chronic opioid use for more than four weeks prior to surgery
- Presence of pre-existing chronic pain conditions, such as migraine or fibromyalgia
- History of alcohol or substance abuse
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to local anesthetics or opioids
- Presence of severe organ dysfunction, including clinically significant hepatic or renal disease
- Any contraindication to regional anesthesia
- Severe psychiatric disorders impairing patient cooperation or the ability to reliably assess pain (e.g., psychosis, dementia)
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Presence of hematological disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Karabuk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Karabük, 78200, Turkey (Türkiye)
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun City Hospital
Samsun, 55200, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elif Sarikaya Ozel, M.D.
Karabuk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Block randomization lists will be generated using Microsoft Office 365 Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA), and patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two study groups in a 1:1 ratio. According to the randomization result, group allocation will be placed in sealed opaque envelopes. Forty-five minutes before block performance, an independent nurse who is not involved in the study will deliver the envelope containing group assignment to the anesthesiologist performing the regional block. Patients, surgeons, ward nurses, and all personnel involved in postoperative data collection and outcome assessment will remain blinded to group allocation. Investigators responsible for outcome evaluation and statistical analysis will also be blinded to the randomization results. To ensure block quality and standardization, all regional blocks will be performed by a single experienced anesthesiologist who has performed each block technique at least 30 times. For masking purposes, this anesth
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator- M.D. Karabuk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2026
First Posted
January 30, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion
April 1, 2026
Study Completion
April 15, 2026
Last Updated
January 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared outside the study team, as the dataset contains sensitive clinical information and data sharing was not included in the original informed consent. Data will be used solely for the purposes of the current study and related scientific publications, in accordance with institutional policies and ethical regulations.