NCT07375810

Brief Summary

The study objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of the ECGio algorithm in predicting clinically significant coronary artery disease . ECGio's diagnostic performance during the trial will be compared against an objective performance ¬criteria using a mixed reference standard of quantitative coronary angiography and quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography in patients a general adult population under suspicion of coronary artery disease.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
978

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
3mo left

Started Apr 2026

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress34%
Apr 2026Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 21, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 29, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2026

Expected
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 30, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 25, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Artificial IntelligenceElectrocardiogramCoronary Artery Disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sensitivity & Specificity

    The lower 95% bound of ECGio's sensitivity and specificity in patients who underwent invasive angiography or computed tomography angiography (Co-primary endpoints)

    Within 30 days of enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Sensitivity & Specificity

    For the first 300 patients referred to invasive angiography through study completion, an average of 90 days

  • Demographic Performance

    For patients in the 30 days following computed tomography angiography

  • Angiographic Stenosis Prediction

    For the first 300 patients referred to invasive angiography through study completion, an average of 90 days

Study Arms (3)

CT Angiogram

This is the Cohort which received only Computed Tomography Angiography as a part of the study

Device: AI-ECG Analysis

Invasive Angiography

This is the Cohort which received both Computed Tomography Angiography and Invasive Angiography as a part of the study

Device: AI-ECG Analysis

Enrollment Period 2

This Cohort is the continuation of enrollment of invasive angiogram patients beyond the completion of the primary endpoint

Device: AI-ECG Analysis

Interventions

The AI-Analysis done on the ECGs in a retrospective fashion

CT AngiogramEnrollment Period 2Invasive Angiography

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 89 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population will be made up of all-comers to Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography from each site taking up to the first 250, consecutive patients recruited for the analysis.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients 18 years of age or older at time of data collection.
  • Patients with medical records stored in a digitized format.
  • Patients under suspicion of coronary artery disease (both suspicion of significant coronary artery disease as well as to rule out significant CAD) who present to the site with an electrocardiogram recorded up to 30 days prior to Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with acute coronary syndrome.
  • Patients who previously underwent coronary artery bypass grafting.
  • Patients whose electrocardiogram tracing has extreme noise or artifact to the extent that it would be recommended to redo the tracing.
  • Patients with prior percutaneous coronary intervention resulting in stenting.
  • Unanalyzable invasive coronary angiogram.
  • Unanalyzable Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.
  • Unanalyzable electrocardiogram signal.
  • Incomplete invasive coronary angiogram (e.g., only the right coronary artery was injected and visualized).
  • Patient core lab analyzed Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography showed ≥ 50% blockage in any vessel but patient was not referred to invasive coronary angiogram.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Medstar Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States

Location

Cena Research Institute

Houston, Texas, 77055, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Leasure M, Jain U, Butchy A, Otten J, Covalesky VA, McCormick D, Mintz GS. Deep Learning Algorithm Predicts Angiographic Coronary Artery Disease in Stable Patients Using Only a Standard 12-Lead Electrocardiogram. Can J Cardiol. 2021 Nov;37(11):1715-1724. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.08.005. Epub 2021 Aug 20.

    PMID: 34419615BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Gary S Mintz

    CardioVascular Research Foundation

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2026

First Posted

January 29, 2026

Study Start

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 30, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

This data cannot be shared due to individual site data retention policies

Locations