Observing 3-5 Year Old Children's Use of Interactive Electronic Devices (IED) in the Family Home to Understand the Context These Devices Are Being Used in, Exploring Whether Socioeconomic Factors or Parent's Own Use of Such Devices Influence the Child's IED Usage.

NCT07373483 | Recruiting DMC

• 2 other identifiers: AA63081485NIHR159040
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 20
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study aims to explore the context of how children aged 3-5 use interactive electronic devices like tablets or smartphones in their everyday home environment. The researchers will look at the social, family, and environmental factors that shape this use. This study will use a qualitative ethnographic approach to explore how young children aged 3-5 use interactive electronic devices (IEDs) in the home. Data will be collected through questionnaires, exploring parent and child IED use, and video recordings of children in their natural home environment over one week, with three recording sessions of approximately four hours each. Following the recording period, selected clips will be reviewed with parents during a semi-structured interview to reflect on behaviours, routines, and context. These videos will help capture not just what children do, but also how they interact with others while using the devices - like gestures, facial expressions, and conversations. The researchers will process the data and extract some video clips. These clips will be used to discuss with parents what they saw in the videos during 60-90-minute interviews to get their insights and giving us a deeper understanding of the child's behaviour and communication. Data analysis will involve inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts to identify patterns and themes in parental reflections and experiences. To support and accelerate this process, video analysis will be used to extract key moments and behaviours from the recordings, helping to contextualise and enrich the thematic findings. This combined approach will allow for a deep understanding of the social and environmental factors shaping children's technology use. The study will include families from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds, with children aged 3-5 years of age. Participants will be recruited through early years settings, as well as via flyers distributed across family hubs, community centres, libraries and on social media throughout Yorkshire.

Conditions

This Study Explores How Young Children Aged 3 to 5 Use Interactive Electronic Devices

Keywords

Early Years; Mobile Devices; Socioeconomic Development; Home Context

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

• Ethnographic Observation of Children's use of Interactive Electronic Devices

  Parents' perceptions and attitudes toward their child's use of interactive electronic devices (IEDs) will be assessed through semi-structured interviews. These interviews will explore parents' views on the appropriateness, benefits, and potential risks of IED usage, as well as their beliefs about the circumstances under which their child engages with these devices. Responses will provide qualitative insights into parental attitudes and perceived influences on Early Years children's technology use.

  Through study completion, an average of 6 months.

• Video Observation

  Video observations made by the researchers will help to provide understanding on how and why the phenomena (child's use of interactive electronic device) occur. Three four hour clips will be selected to analyse for themes and repeated behaviours during the child's device use.

  During analysis of video footage (first 3 weeks of participation).

Study Arms (2)

Study Population: Children aged 3-5 years old

We will be recruiting participants who are 3-5 years of age and use interactive electronic devices and who have not been clinically diagnosed with a developmental disorder by a medical professional.

Study Population: Parent of children aged 3-5 years involved in the study

We will interview a parent or carer of the 3-5 year old children involved in the study to gain insights from the video recordings taken of their children using interactive electronic devices in the family home.

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 3 Years - 5 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

3-5 year old children, living in Yorkshire, UK, who currently uses an interactive electronic device while at home, without a diagnosed behavioural or cognitive condition.

You may qualify if:

• Children between 3 and 5 years old
• Children who use an interactive electronic device
• Children who have received parent/carer consent for participation and provided verbal assent

You may not qualify if:

• Children whose parents do not speak and/or understand English
• Children who have been clinically diagnosed with a developmental disorder by a medical professional prior to either baseline or follow-up assessments

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Sheffield Hallam University: lead
• University of Chester: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Sheffield Hallam University

Sheffield, S1 1WB, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Related Publications (19)

• Hennink, M. and Kaiser, B.N., 2022. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social science & medicine, 292, p.114523.

  BACKGROUND

• Azevedo, L.B., Downes, M., Eastburn, S., Covell, J. and Bissell, P. (2025) 'Early years practitioners' and public health consultants' perspectives on the use of interactive electronic devices in young children: A qualitative study', Child Care Health and Development, 51(1), e70022. doi:10.1111/cch.70022.

  BACKGROUND

• Bentley, G.F., Turner, K.M. and Jago, R. (2016) 'Mothers' views of their preschool child's screen-viewing behaviour: a qualitative study', BMC Public Health, 16, Article 718. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3440-z.

  BACKGROUND

• Clarke, V., Braun, V. and Hayfield, N. (2015) 'Thematic analysis', in Smith, J.A. (ed.) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. 3rd edn. London: Sage, pp. 222-248.

  BACKGROUND

• Eldh, A.C., Årestedt, L. and Berterö, C. (2020) 'Quotations in qualitative studies: reflections on constituents, custom, and purpose', International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, pp. 1-8. doi:10.1177/1609406920969268.

  BACKGROUND

• Everri, M., Heitmayer, M., Yamin-Slotkus, P. and Lahlou, S. (2020) 'Ethical challenges of using video for qualitative research and ethnography', in Challenges and Solutions in Ethnographic Research. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 68-83.

  BACKGROUND

• Goldman, R. (2014) 'Video representations and the perspectivity framework: Epistemology, ethnography, evaluation, and ethics', in Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B. and Derry, S. (eds.) Video Research in the Learning Sciences. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 3-37.

  BACKGROUND

• Heath, C., Luff, P. and Svensson, M.S. (2007) 'Video and qualitative research: analysing medical practice and interaction', Medical Education, 41(1), pp. 109-116. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02641.x.

  BACKGROUND

• Kabali, H.K., Irigoyen, M.M., Nunez-Davis, R., Budacki, J.G., Mohanty, S.H., Leister, K.P. and Bonner, R.L. Jr. (2015) 'Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children', Pediatrics, 136(6), pp. 1044-1050. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-2151.

  BACKGROUND

• Khandkar, S.H. (2009) Open coding. University of Calgary. Available at: https://studylib.net/doc/18074044/open-coding---university-of-calgary (Accessed: 25.11.25).

  BACKGROUND

• Korstjens, I., Mesman, J., van Helmond, I., de Vries, R. and Nieuwenhuijze, M. (2021) 'The paradoxes of communication and collaboration in maternity care: A video-reflexivity study with professionals and parents', Women and Birth, 34(2), pp. 145-153. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.01.014.

  BACKGROUND

• Maggs-Rapport, F. (2000) 'Combining methodological approaches in research: ethnography and interpretive phenomenology', Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(1), pp. 219-225. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01243.x.

  BACKGROUND

• Manojlovich, M., Frankel, R.M., Harrod, M., Heshmati, A., Hofer, T., Umberfield, E. et al. (2019) 'Formative evaluation of the video reflexive ethnography method, as applied to the physician-nurse dyad', BMJ Quality & Safety, 28(2), pp. 160-166. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008390.

  BACKGROUND

• Skivington, K., Matthews, L., Simpson, S.A., Craig, P., Baird, J., Blazeby, J.M. et al. (2021) 'A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance', BMJ, 374, n2061. doi:10.1136/bmj.n2061.

  BACKGROUND

• Risley, T.R. and Hart, B. (1968) 'Developing correspondence between the non-verbal and verbal behavior of preschool children', Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(4), pp. 267-281. doi:10.1901/jaba.1968.1-267.

  BACKGROUND

• Radesky, J.S., Weeks, H.M., Ball, R., Schaller, A., Yeo, S., Durnez, J. et al. (2020) 'Young children's use of smartphones and tablets', Pediatrics, 146(1), e20193518. doi:10.1542/peds.2019-3518.

  BACKGROUND

• Morgan, D.L. (2014) 'Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research', Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), pp. 1045-1053. doi:10.1177/1077800413513733.

  BACKGROUND

• Asan, O. and Montague, E. (2014) 'Using video-based observation research methods in primary care health encounters to evaluate complex interactions', Informatics in Primary Care, 21(4), pp. 161-170. doi:10.14236/jhi.v21i4.72.

  BACKGROUND

• Arabiat, D., Al Jabery, M., Robinson, S., Whitehead, L. and Mörelius, E. (2023) 'Interactive technology use and child development: A systematic review', Child Care Health and Development, 49(4), pp. 679-715. doi:10.1111/cch.13082.

  BACKGROUND

Study Officials

• Eleanor Craig, PhD

  Sheffield Hallam University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

• Liane Beretta de Azevedo

  Sheffield Hallam University

  STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Eleanor Craig, PhD

CONTACT

+447407686957; Eleanor.Craig@SHU.ac.uk

Liane Beretta de Azevedo, PhD

CONTACT

L.Azevedo@shu.ac.uk

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: FAMILY BASED
• Time Perspective: CROSS SECTIONAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 5, 2025
• First Posted: January 28, 2026
• Study Start: November 17, 2025
• Primary Completion (Estimated): July 31, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): December 31, 2026
• Last Updated: January 28, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Shared Documents: STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF

Locations

GB (1)