Turkish Version of Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index
Turkish Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index
1 other identifier
observational
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to translate the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index (HCDI) into Turkish and to test its validity and reliability as an outcome measurement method in individuals with temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD). The study included 40 patients. Participants' pain intensity and range of jaw movement were measured, followed by the administration of the HDCI, the Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI), and the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ). For test-retest reliability, the same questionnaire was administered again to the same patients two weeks later, and the FAI was used to test the validity of the questionnaire.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 10, 2026
CompletedJanuary 27, 2026
January 1, 2026
21 days
January 18, 2026
January 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Internal Consistency of the Turkish Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index
Internal consistency will be evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. A value of 0.70 or higher is considered indicative of good internal consistency for the scale and its subscales.
At baseline (Day 0).
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Turkish Version of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index
Baseline (Day 0) and 14 days after the baseline assessment for test-retest reliability.
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Baseline (Day 0) and 14 days after the baseline assessment.
Range of Jaw Movement
Baseline (Day 0) and 14 days after the baseline assessment.
Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ) Score
Baseline (Day 0) and 14 days after the baseline assessment.
Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) Score
Baseline (Day 0) and 14 days after the baseline assessment.
Study Arms (1)
Helkimo Index Study Group
Individuals who meet the inclusion criteria for the Turkish validity and reliability study of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index. All participants will undergo a comprehensive clinical examination and multiple scale assessments at baseline. To assess test-retest reliability, all participants will be re-evaluated after a two-week interval.
Interventions
The intervention includes a detailed clinical assessment and a series of questionnaires. Participants will provide demographic data, trauma, and surgical history. Clinical evaluation includes the measurement of pain and jaw movements. Subjective symptoms will be assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), linear ruler, Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI), and Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ). The Turkish version of the Helkimo Index will be administered to test its validity and reliability. To evaluate test-retest reliability, the entire procedure will be repeated for a subgroup after 14 days.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population will consist of individuals who visit the Umay Private Oral and Dental Health Clinic between March 2025 and May 2025. Participants will include those diagnosed with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) based on physical and clinical examinations by a specialist. The study will recruit adults who meet the specific inclusion criteria for the Turkish validity and reliability analysis of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index. The estimated duration of the data collection phase is 3 months.
You may qualify if:
- Being between 18 and 60 years of age and having been diagnosed with TMB,
- The person must be a volunteer to participate in the study,
- The native language must be Turkish.
You may not qualify if:
- Having a history of malignant conditions, trauma, or surgery in the cranial and cervical region,
- Inability to cooperate,
- Regular use of analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs,
- Having dentofacial anomalies,
- Having active inflammatory arthritis,
- Having metabolic diseases (gout, osteoporosis, Cushing's disease, and hyper/hypoparathyroidism),
- Having connective tissue, rheumatological (systemic lupus erythematosus and scleroderma), and hematological disorders (anemia and leukemia),
- Having a diagnosed psychiatric illness,
- Having received physical therapy related to TMB less than 6 months ago,
- Not being a native language of Turkish
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Umay Private Oral and Dental Health Clinic
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Yildiz NT, Alkan A, Kulunkoglu BA. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire. Cranio. 2024 Mar;42(2):160-170. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2021.2004715. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
PMID: 34789075RESULTStegenga B, de Bont LG, de Leeuw R, Boering G. Assessment of mandibular function impairment associated with temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis and internal derangement. J Orofac Pain. 1993 Spring;7(2):183-95.
PMID: 8358365RESULTKaynak BA, Tas S, Salkin Y. The accuracy and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fonseca anamnestic index in temporomandibular disorders. Cranio. 2023 Jan;41(1):78-83. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2020.1812808. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
PMID: 32840464RESULTBevilaqua-Grossi D, Chaves TC, de Oliveira AS, Monteiro-Pedro V. Anamnestic index severity and signs and symptoms of TMD. Cranio. 2006 Apr;24(2):112-8. doi: 10.1179/crn.2006.018.
PMID: 16711273RESULTvan der Weele LT, Dibbets JM. Helkimo's index: a scale or just a set of symptoms? J Oral Rehabil. 1987 May;14(3):229-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00714.x.
PMID: 3474383RESULTAlonso-Royo R, Sanchez-Torrelo CM, Ibanez-Vera AJ, Zagalaz-Anula N, Castellote-Caballero Y, Obrero-Gaitan E, Rodriguez-Almagro D, Lomas-Vega R. Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 8;11(3):472. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030472.
PMID: 33800185RESULTÇınar, F., Şengül, H., Çapar, H., Çakmak, C., & Bilge, Y. (2018). Perception of health news: a scale development study. J Acad Res Nurs, 4(3), 164-171.
RESULTChilds JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1331-4. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29.
PMID: 15928561RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2026
First Posted
January 27, 2026
Study Start
January 25, 2026
Primary Completion
February 15, 2026
Study Completion
March 10, 2026
Last Updated
January 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share