Comparative Effectiveness of Verbal Instruction Versus Simulation Video Education Among Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy
CARE-RT
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this Randomized Controlled Trial is to compare the effectiveness of radiotherapy-specific, physician-led educational videos introduced before the initial Radiation Therapy consultation . The primary objective is to assess the impact on patient-reported knowledge of RT, with secondary objectives including assessment of patient-reported anxiety and satisfaction with the educational process. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups.
- 1.Video Group - Patients will receive a WhatsApp message containing the educational video prior to their consultation.
- 2.Verbal Instruction Group - Patients will receive standard verbal education from a radiation oncologist during their consultation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
January 26, 2026
January 1, 2026
5 months
January 1, 2026
January 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
''Change in Patient-Reported Understanding of Radiation Therapy Between Pre- and Post-Consultation Assessments''
The primary outcome of this study is the change in patient-reported knowledge and understanding of radiation therapy (RT) following exposure to educational intervention. This outcome is measured by comparing pre- and post-consultation knowledge and understanding scores between the two study arms (video education vs. verbal instruction) using a self-administered 5-point Likert questionnaire (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent). Higher scores indicate better understanding. Anxiety is measured on a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (0 = no anxiety, 10 = maximum), with higher scores indicating worse anxiety. The questionnaire evaluates patient understanding across key domains of the radiation therapy process, including RT purpose and goals, simulation and immobilization, treatment delivery, expected side effects, and follow-up. The primary endpoint is the mean change in composite knowledge score from baseline to post-consultation, with greater improvement indicating better understanding.
Baseline and immediately post- educational intervention (same-day assessment)
Study Arms (2)
Video Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive a WhatsApp message containing the educational video prior to their consultation.
Verbal Instruction Group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients will receive a standard verbal education from a radiation oncologist during their consultation.
Interventions
This intervention consists of a radiotherapy-specific, physician-led educational video delivered prior to the first radiation oncology consultation. The video was locally developed, filmed within the actual CyberKnife and Tomotherapy facility, and features real radiation oncologists, residents, and departmental staff familiar to patients. It demonstrates real simulation rooms, immobilization devices, and treatment machines that patients will encounter during their care. The video is 3.5 minutes in duration, delivered in Urdu, the native language of the study population, and specifically designed for radiation therapy-naïve patients in a lower-middle-income country setting. Content includes an overview of radiation therapy, simulation procedures, treatment delivery, common side effects, and post-treatment follow-up.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with cancer and scheduled for radiation therapy at Tomotherapy unit of Cyber knife and Tomotherapy Centre of JPMC.
- Fluent in Urdu.
- No prior experience with radiation therapy.
- Must have smart phone
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fatima Shaukat, MBBS, FCPS
Patients Aid Foundation, JPMC
- STUDY DIRECTOR
YUMNA AHMED, MBBS, FCPS
Patients Aid Foundation, JPMC
- STUDY CHAIR
Rabia Tahseen, MBBS, FCPS
Patients Aid Foundation, JPMC
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Agha Muhammad Hammad Khan, MBBS, FCPS
Ziauddin university Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Radiation Oncologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 1, 2026
First Posted
January 26, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 26, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01