Pipelle Versus Karman Endometrial Biopsy Under Standardized Paracervical Block
PB-EMB
Comparison of Pipelle and Karman Endometrial Biopsy Methods Under Standardized Paracervical Block: A Prospective Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
480
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endometrial biopsy is a commonly used outpatient procedure to evaluate abnormal uterine bleeding and postmenopausal bleeding. Different sampling methods are available, but their diagnostic adequacy and patient experience may vary. This prospective randomized study compares two commonly used endometrial biopsy methods, Pipelle and Karman cannula, under standardized paracervical block anesthesia. All participants receive the same local anesthetic technique to minimize pain-related differences between methods. The primary objective is to compare the rate of clinically adequate endometrial samples obtained with each method. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported pain, patient satisfaction, procedure duration, need for additional diagnostic procedures, and hospital-related costs. Study findings are expected to support clinical decision-making regarding the most effective and practical endometrial biopsy method when adequate pain control is provided.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 3, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 9, 2026
CompletedFebruary 10, 2026
January 1, 2026
28 days
January 3, 2026
February 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinically Adequate Endometrial Sample Rate
Proportion of endometrial biopsy samples considered clinically adequate for diagnosis based on blinded histopathological assessment.
At the index procedure (same day)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Procedure-Related Pain Score
Periprocedural
Patient Satisfaction With the Procedure
Same day after the procedure
Procedure Duration
During the procedure
Need for Additional Diagnostic Procedures
Within 2 weeks after the procedure
Hospital-Related Cost per Participant
Within 2 weeks after the procedure
Study Arms (2)
Pipelle Endometrial Biopsy
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to this arm undergo office-based endometrial biopsy using a Pipelle device. All procedures are performed under standardized paracervical block anesthesia with the same anesthetic agent, dose, and technique as the other study arm.
Karman Endometrial Biopsy
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to this arm undergo office-based endometrial sampling using a Karman cannula. All procedures are performed under standardized paracervical block anesthesia with the same anesthetic agent, dose, and technique as the other study arm.
Interventions
Endometrial sampling performed using a Karman cannula in an outpatient setting. The procedure is conducted under standardized paracervical block anesthesia using the same anesthetic agent, dose, and technique for all participants.
Endometrial sampling performed using a Pipelle device in an outpatient setting. The procedure is conducted under standardized paracervical block anesthesia using the same anesthetic agent, dose, and technique for all participants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female participants aged 18 years or older
- Abnormal uterine bleeding or postmenopausal bleeding requiring endometrial sampling
- Ability to provide written informed consent
- Eligible for office-based endometrial biopsy
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Active pelvic infection
- Known cervical or endometrial cancer
- Severe cervical stenosis preventing endometrial sampling
- Known bleeding disorders or use of anticoagulant therapy that contraindicates biopsy
- Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Coskun ES, Yeniocak AS, Bacak HB, Salman S. Optimizing analgesia for endometrial biopsy: A prospective, randomized comparative study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2025 Jan;51(1):e16148. doi: 10.1111/jog.16148. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
PMID: 39551483RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Fatma Ketenci Gencer, Assoc. Prof.
University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Histopathological evaluation of endometrial samples is performed by pathologists who are blinded to the biopsy method used.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2026
First Posted
January 26, 2026
Study Start
January 3, 2026
Primary Completion
January 31, 2026
Study Completion
February 9, 2026
Last Updated
February 10, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared due to local ethical regulations and the need to protect participant privacy. The dataset contains sensitive clinical information, and no consent for public data sharing was obtained from participants.