PGE2 Followed by Oxytocin vs Oxytocin in Term PROM (POXY-PROM)
POXY-PROM
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Labor Induction Using Dinoprostone Followed by Oxytocin Versus Oxytocin Alone in Term Pregnancies With Premature Rupture of Membranes and an Unfavorable Cervix - A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
450
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is being done to learn more about the best way to start labor for pregnant women whose water breaks at term before labor begins, a condition called term prelabor rupture of membranes (term PROM). When this happens and the cervix is not ready for labor, it is unclear which induction method works best and is safest for mother and baby. The purpose of this study is to compare two common ways to induce labor in women with term PROM and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score ≤ 6). One group will receive a vaginal dinoprostone insert (Propess) for 6 hours to soften the cervix, followed by oxytocin if labor does not start. The other group will receive immediate oxytocin through a vein. Pregnant women aged 18 years or older with a single baby in head-down position at 37-42 weeks, whose water has broken and whose cervix is not yet favorable, may be able to join this study. All care will be provided at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Hanoi, Vietnam, where both medicines are already used in routine practice. The main outcome is how many women have a vaginal birth. The study will also look at how long it takes from induction to birth, complications for mothers and babies, and women's experiences of labor. The results may help doctors choose the safest and most effective way to induce labor for women with term PROM in the future.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 10, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2028
February 20, 2026
February 1, 2026
1.8 years
January 9, 2026
February 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Vaginal delivery
Number of participants delivered vaginally
From induction until delivery, assessed up to 36 hours after randomization
Secondary Outcomes (24)
Mode of delivery
Within 24 hours from labor induction
Time from induction of labor to delivery
From induction until delivery, assessed up to 24 hours after induction
Oxytocin augmentation
From induction until delivery, assessed up to 24 hours after induction
Uterine hyperstimulation
From induction until delivery, assessed up to 24 hours after induction
Maternal satisfaction
Once between 90 minutes and 3 hours after delivery
- +19 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (29)
Vaginal delivery within 12 hours
From induction until delivery, assessed up to 12 hours after induction
Reaching active phase of labor
From induction until reaching active phase, assessed up to 12 hours after induction
Time from induction to dinoprostone insert removal
From induction until dinoprostone vaginal insert removal, assessed up to 12 hours after induction
- +26 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Dinoprostone (Propess) + Oxytocin
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will receive a 10-mg vaginal dinoprostone insert (Propess) for cervical ripening. After 6 hours, if active labor has not begun or uterine contractions are inadequate, intravenous oxytocin will be started according to the hospital's standardized induction protocol. Continuous fetal monitoring and standardized management of uterine tachysystole will be applied. This approach reflects a sequential induction method commonly used for women with term PROM and an unfavorable cervix.
Immediate Oxytocin Induction
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm will receive immediate induction of labor using intravenous oxytocin according to the hospital's standardized induction protocol. No cervical ripening agent will be used before starting oxytocin. Maternal and fetal status will be monitored throughout labor, and uterine tachysystole will be managed in line with institutional guidelines. This arm represents the comparator strategy of inducing labor directly with oxytocin in women with term PROM and an unfavorable cervix.
Interventions
A sequential induction strategy in which a 10-mg vaginal dinoprostone insert (Propess) is placed for cervical ripening. After 6 hours, if active labor has not begun or uterine contractions are inadequate, intravenous oxytocin is initiated according to the hospital's standardized induction protocol. Continuous fetal monitoring is applied, and tachysystole is managed per institutional guidelines.
Intravenous oxytocin is used for immediate induction of labor in women with term prelabor rupture of membranes and an unfavorable cervix. Oxytocin is started according to the hospital's standardized induction protocol without prior use of cervical ripening agents. Maternal and fetal status are monitored throughout labor, and uterine tachysystole is managed according to institutional guidelines.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Maternal age ≥ 18 years
- Gestational age from 37 to 42 weeks, determined by last menstrual period or by a first- or second-trimester ultrasound
- Live singleton fetus
- Prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) confirmed by at least one of the following:
- Amniotic fluid visibly draining from the cervical os during sterile speculum examination
- Pool of fluid in the posterior fornix
- Cephalic presentation
- Bishop score ≤ 6
- No spontaneous uterine contractions
- No contraindications for vaginal delivery
You may not qualify if:
- Active labor
- Previous uterine surgery (e.g., cesarean section)
- Chorioamnionitis or non-reassuring fetal status
- Major fetal anomalies
- Contraindications to prostaglandin or vaginal delivery
- Refusal to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Hanoi, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam
Related Publications (9)
Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 217. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;135(3):e80-e97. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003700.
PMID: 32080050RESULTInducing labour. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2021 Nov 4. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK579537/
PMID: 35438865RESULTKunt C, Kanat-Pektas M, Gungor AN, Kurt RK, Ozat M, Gulerman C, Gungor T, Mollamahmutoglu L. Randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus oxytocin for labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;49(1):57-61. doi: 10.1016/S1028-4559(10)60010-1.
PMID: 20466294RESULTGungorduk K, Asicioglu O, Besimoglu B, Gungorduk OC, Yildirm G, Ark C, Sahbaz A. Labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes: comparison between oxytocin and dinoprostone followed 6 hours later by oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):60.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.035. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
PMID: 21924396RESULTGulersen M, Zottola C, Li X, Krantz D, DiSturco M, Bornstein E. Chorioamnionitis after premature rupture of membranes in nulliparas undergoing labor induction: prostaglandin E2 vs. oxytocin. J Perinat Med. 2021 Jun 9;49(9):1058-1063. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0094. Print 2021 Nov 25.
PMID: 34109770RESULTMackeen AD, Durie DE, Lin M, Huls CK, Qureshey E, Paglia MJ, Sun H, Sciscione A. Foley Plus Oxytocin Compared With Oxytocin for Induction After Membrane Rupture: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;131(1):4-11. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002374.
PMID: 29215519RESULTBorovac-Pinheiro A, Inversetti A, Di Simone N, Barnea ER; FIGO Childbirth and Postpartum Hemorrhage Committee. FIGO good practice recommendations for induced or spontaneous labor at term: Prep-for-Labor triage to minimize risks and maximize favorable outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Oct;163 Suppl 2:51-56. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15114.
PMID: 37807591RESULTMiddleton P, Shepherd E, Flenady V, McBain RD, Crowther CA. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 4;1(1):CD005302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005302.pub3.
PMID: 28050900RESULTDos Santos F, Drymiotou S, Antequera Martin A, Mol BW, Gale C, Devane D, Van't Hooft J, Johnson MJ, Hogg M, Thangaratinam S. Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study. BJOG. 2018 Dec;125(13):1673-1680. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15397. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
PMID: 29981523RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2026
First Posted
January 26, 2026
Study Start
February 10, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Last Updated
February 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02