NCT07360730

Brief Summary

This prospective multicentre observational registry evaluates early clinical outcomes following the use of High-Purity Type I Collagen (HPTC) as a circumferential nerve wrap during peripheral nerve procedures. Eligible procedures include nerve repair, coaptation, grafting, nerve transfers, and decompressions in the upper and lower limbs. Primary outcomes include early motor recovery assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) motor grading system. Secondary outcomes include sensory recovery, neuropathic pain, patient-reported functional outcomes, complication rates, and patient satisfaction assessed at standardized postoperative intervals up to two months.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 9, 2025

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 2, 2026

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 22, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 26, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 3, 2026

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 30, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 30, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

January 2, 2026

Results QC Date

March 7, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 27, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Motor Functional Recovery (MRC Grade ≥ M3)

    Motor recovery of the involved muscle groups assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) Motor Grading system. Successful recovery was defined as achievement of MRC grade ≥ M3, representing active movement against gravity.

    2 months post-operative

  • Sensory Recovery - Two-Point Discrimination

    Sensory recovery assessed using two-point discrimination testing in the affected nerve distribution, measured as the minimum distance (in millimeters) at which two points are perceived as separate.

    2 months post-operative

  • Number of Participants With Sensory Recovery Assessed by Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing

    Number of participants demonstrating sensory recovery as assessed by Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing at 2 months postoperatively. Sensory recovery was defined as the ability to perceive a clinically meaningful monofilament threshold in the affected nerve distribution. Higher values indicate greater proportion of participants achieving sensory recovery.

    2 months post-operative

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Neuropathic Pain Intensity

    Baseline, 1 month, and 2 months post-operative

  • Upper Limb Patient-Reported Functional Outcome (QuickDASH)

    1 month and 2 months post-operative

  • Lower Limb Patient-Reported Functional Outcome (LEFS)

    1 month and 2 months post-operative

  • Patient Satisfaction

    2 months post-operative

Study Arms (1)

HPTC Nerve Wrap Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants undergoing peripheral nerve procedures-including nerve repair, coaptation, grafting, nerve transfer, or decompression-in whom a High-Purity Type I Collagen (HPTC) membrane is used intraoperatively as a circumferential nerve wrap. Outcomes related to motor recovery, sensory recovery, neuropathic pain, complications, and patient-reported functional status are prospectively assessed.

Device: High-Purity Type I Collagen (HPTC) Nerve Wrap

Interventions

After completion of nerve repair, coaptation, grafting, transfer, or decompression, a sterile HPTC collagen membrane is hydrated as per manufacturer instructions, trimmed to the length of the treated nerve segment (approximately 1.5-4 cm), and wrapped circumferentially as a loose perineural sleeve. The wrap is secured using fibrin glue or fine absorbable sutures. Standard wound closure and postoperative rehabilitation protocols are followed.

HPTC Nerve Wrap Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 to 70 years
  • Patients undergoing peripheral nerve procedures including: Primary nerve repair, Nerve coaptation, Nerve grafting, Nerve transfer, Revision nerve decompression
  • Upper or lower limb nerve involvement
  • Intraoperative use of HPTC nerve wrap
  • Ability to comply with follow-up
  • Written informed consent provided

You may not qualify if:

  • Active infection at the surgical site
  • Known hypersensitivity to collagen products
  • Severe uncontrolled systemic illness
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Re-operation at the same nerve site within the previous 6 months
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences

Mandya, Karnataka, 571448, India

Location

Mysore Medical College and Research Institute

Mysore, Karnataka, 570001, India

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Klein S, Vykoukal J, Felthaus O, Dienstknecht T, Prantl L. Collagen Type I Conduits for the Regeneration of Nerve Defects. Materials (Basel). 2016 Mar 23;9(4):219. doi: 10.3390/ma9040219.

    PMID: 28773346BACKGROUND
  • Kokkalis ZT, Mavrogenis AF, Ballas EG, Papagelopoulos PJ, Soucacos PN. Collagen nerve wrap for median nerve scarring. Orthopedics. 2015 Feb;38(2):117-21. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150204-04.

    PMID: 25665110BACKGROUND
  • Tanaka H, Kurimoto S, Hirata H. Efficacy of collagen conduit wrapping with collagen fibers on nerve regeneration in sciatic nerve injury with partial transection: An experimental study in the rat model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2024 Jan;112(1):e35369. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35369.

    PMID: 38247253BACKGROUND
  • Narayan N, Shivannaiah C, Gowda S. Evaluating the Efficacy of High-Purity Type I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute Versus Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Cureus. 2025 Jul 30;17(7):e89031. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89031. eCollection 2025 Jul.

    PMID: 40747200BACKGROUND
  • Narayan N, Ramegowda YH, Raghupathi DS, Chethan S, Gowda S. Biological Skin Substitutes in Pressure Ulcers: High-Purity Type I Collagen-Based Versus Amnion/Chorion Membrane. Cureus. 2025 Aug 25;17(8):e90956. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90956. eCollection 2025 Aug.

    PMID: 40862036BACKGROUND
  • Narayan N, Shivaiah R, Kumar V, Kumar KM, Chethan S, Gowda S. Comparative Efficacy of High Purity Type I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute and Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus. 2025 Oct 19;17(10):e94952. doi: 10.7759/cureus.94952. eCollection 2025 Oct.

    PMID: 41122365BACKGROUND
  • Narayan N, Raghupathi D, Ramamurthy V, Chethan S, Gowda S. A Comparative Analysis in the Treatment of Full-Thickness Wounds: Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) Combined With High-Purity Type I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute Versus NPWT Alone. Cureus. 2025 Nov 16;17(11):e96977. doi: 10.7759/cureus.96977. eCollection 2025 Nov.

    PMID: 41250786BACKGROUND
  • Lee S, Ahmad A, Jeon G. Combining Bootstrap Aggregation with Support Vector Regression for Small Blood Pressure Measurement. J Med Syst. 2018 Feb 28;42(4):63. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-0913-x.

    PMID: 29488105BACKGROUND
  • Mayrhofer-Schmid M, Klemm TT, Aman M, Kneser U, Eberlin KR, Harhaus L, Boecker AH. Shielding the Nerve: A Systematic Review of Nerve Wrapping to Prevent Adhesions in the Rat Sciatic Nerve Model. J Pers Med. 2023 Sep 24;13(10):1431. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101431.

    PMID: 37888042BACKGROUND
  • Radecka W, Nogalska W, Siemionow M. Peripheral Nerve Protection Strategies: Recent Advances and Potential Clinical Applications. J Funct Biomater. 2025 Apr 24;16(5):153. doi: 10.3390/jfb16050153.

    PMID: 40422818BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Nerve InjuriesNeuroma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesNerve Sheath NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Nerve TissueNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasms

Limitations and Caveats

The absence of a control group limits causal inference, and the sample size restricts detailed subgroup analysis. Lack of blinding may have introduced performance and reporting bias. Follow-up was limited to early postoperative outcomes up to two months, precluding assessment of long-term functional recovery and late complications.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Prof Naveen Narayan
Organization
Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences

Study Officials

  • Prema Dhanraj, MS, MCh

    Rajarajeshwari Medical College and Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2026

First Posted

January 22, 2026

Study Start

December 9, 2025

Primary Completion

February 26, 2026

Study Completion

March 3, 2026

Last Updated

March 30, 2026

Results First Posted

March 30, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported for the primary and secondary outcomes of this study, including motor recovery scores (MRC grading), sensory assessment results, pain scores (VAS), patient-reported outcome measures (QuickDASH/LEFS), complication data, and relevant baseline demographic and procedural variables.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
The data will be made available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary study results and will remain available for up to 5 years following publication.
Access Criteria
Access to the de-identified IPD will be granted to qualified researchers who submit a methodologically sound research proposal. Requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator and study steering committee. Data will be shared under a data-sharing agreement to ensure protection of participant confidentiality.

Locations