High-Purity Type I Collagen Nerve Wrapping in Peripheral Nerve Procedures: A Prospective Registry
Prospective Multicentre Registry of High-Purity Type I Collagen Nerve Wrapping in Peripheral Nerve Procedures: Early Clinical Outcomes
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This prospective multicentre observational registry evaluates early clinical outcomes following the use of High-Purity Type I Collagen (HPTC) as a circumferential nerve wrap during peripheral nerve procedures. Eligible procedures include nerve repair, coaptation, grafting, nerve transfers, and decompressions in the upper and lower limbs. Primary outcomes include early motor recovery assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) motor grading system. Secondary outcomes include sensory recovery, neuropathic pain, patient-reported functional outcomes, complication rates, and patient satisfaction assessed at standardized postoperative intervals up to two months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 9, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 26, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 3, 2026
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 30, 2026
CompletedMarch 30, 2026
March 1, 2026
3 months
January 2, 2026
March 7, 2026
March 27, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Motor Functional Recovery (MRC Grade ≥ M3)
Motor recovery of the involved muscle groups assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) Motor Grading system. Successful recovery was defined as achievement of MRC grade ≥ M3, representing active movement against gravity.
2 months post-operative
Sensory Recovery - Two-Point Discrimination
Sensory recovery assessed using two-point discrimination testing in the affected nerve distribution, measured as the minimum distance (in millimeters) at which two points are perceived as separate.
2 months post-operative
Number of Participants With Sensory Recovery Assessed by Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing
Number of participants demonstrating sensory recovery as assessed by Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing at 2 months postoperatively. Sensory recovery was defined as the ability to perceive a clinically meaningful monofilament threshold in the affected nerve distribution. Higher values indicate greater proportion of participants achieving sensory recovery.
2 months post-operative
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Neuropathic Pain Intensity
Baseline, 1 month, and 2 months post-operative
Upper Limb Patient-Reported Functional Outcome (QuickDASH)
1 month and 2 months post-operative
Lower Limb Patient-Reported Functional Outcome (LEFS)
1 month and 2 months post-operative
Patient Satisfaction
2 months post-operative
Study Arms (1)
HPTC Nerve Wrap Arm
EXPERIMENTALParticipants undergoing peripheral nerve procedures-including nerve repair, coaptation, grafting, nerve transfer, or decompression-in whom a High-Purity Type I Collagen (HPTC) membrane is used intraoperatively as a circumferential nerve wrap. Outcomes related to motor recovery, sensory recovery, neuropathic pain, complications, and patient-reported functional status are prospectively assessed.
Interventions
After completion of nerve repair, coaptation, grafting, transfer, or decompression, a sterile HPTC collagen membrane is hydrated as per manufacturer instructions, trimmed to the length of the treated nerve segment (approximately 1.5-4 cm), and wrapped circumferentially as a loose perineural sleeve. The wrap is secured using fibrin glue or fine absorbable sutures. Standard wound closure and postoperative rehabilitation protocols are followed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 70 years
- Patients undergoing peripheral nerve procedures including: Primary nerve repair, Nerve coaptation, Nerve grafting, Nerve transfer, Revision nerve decompression
- Upper or lower limb nerve involvement
- Intraoperative use of HPTC nerve wrap
- Ability to comply with follow-up
- Written informed consent provided
You may not qualify if:
- Active infection at the surgical site
- Known hypersensitivity to collagen products
- Severe uncontrolled systemic illness
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Re-operation at the same nerve site within the previous 6 months
- Inability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences
Mandya, Karnataka, 571448, India
Mysore Medical College and Research Institute
Mysore, Karnataka, 570001, India
Related Publications (10)
Klein S, Vykoukal J, Felthaus O, Dienstknecht T, Prantl L. Collagen Type I Conduits for the Regeneration of Nerve Defects. Materials (Basel). 2016 Mar 23;9(4):219. doi: 10.3390/ma9040219.
PMID: 28773346BACKGROUNDKokkalis ZT, Mavrogenis AF, Ballas EG, Papagelopoulos PJ, Soucacos PN. Collagen nerve wrap for median nerve scarring. Orthopedics. 2015 Feb;38(2):117-21. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150204-04.
PMID: 25665110BACKGROUNDTanaka H, Kurimoto S, Hirata H. Efficacy of collagen conduit wrapping with collagen fibers on nerve regeneration in sciatic nerve injury with partial transection: An experimental study in the rat model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2024 Jan;112(1):e35369. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35369.
PMID: 38247253BACKGROUNDNarayan N, Shivannaiah C, Gowda S. Evaluating the Efficacy of High-Purity Type I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute Versus Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Cureus. 2025 Jul 30;17(7):e89031. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89031. eCollection 2025 Jul.
PMID: 40747200BACKGROUNDNarayan N, Ramegowda YH, Raghupathi DS, Chethan S, Gowda S. Biological Skin Substitutes in Pressure Ulcers: High-Purity Type I Collagen-Based Versus Amnion/Chorion Membrane. Cureus. 2025 Aug 25;17(8):e90956. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90956. eCollection 2025 Aug.
PMID: 40862036BACKGROUNDNarayan N, Shivaiah R, Kumar V, Kumar KM, Chethan S, Gowda S. Comparative Efficacy of High Purity Type I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute and Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus. 2025 Oct 19;17(10):e94952. doi: 10.7759/cureus.94952. eCollection 2025 Oct.
PMID: 41122365BACKGROUNDNarayan N, Raghupathi D, Ramamurthy V, Chethan S, Gowda S. A Comparative Analysis in the Treatment of Full-Thickness Wounds: Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) Combined With High-Purity Type I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute Versus NPWT Alone. Cureus. 2025 Nov 16;17(11):e96977. doi: 10.7759/cureus.96977. eCollection 2025 Nov.
PMID: 41250786BACKGROUNDLee S, Ahmad A, Jeon G. Combining Bootstrap Aggregation with Support Vector Regression for Small Blood Pressure Measurement. J Med Syst. 2018 Feb 28;42(4):63. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-0913-x.
PMID: 29488105BACKGROUNDMayrhofer-Schmid M, Klemm TT, Aman M, Kneser U, Eberlin KR, Harhaus L, Boecker AH. Shielding the Nerve: A Systematic Review of Nerve Wrapping to Prevent Adhesions in the Rat Sciatic Nerve Model. J Pers Med. 2023 Sep 24;13(10):1431. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101431.
PMID: 37888042BACKGROUNDRadecka W, Nogalska W, Siemionow M. Peripheral Nerve Protection Strategies: Recent Advances and Potential Clinical Applications. J Funct Biomater. 2025 Apr 24;16(5):153. doi: 10.3390/jfb16050153.
PMID: 40422818BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The absence of a control group limits causal inference, and the sample size restricts detailed subgroup analysis. Lack of blinding may have introduced performance and reporting bias. Follow-up was limited to early postoperative outcomes up to two months, precluding assessment of long-term functional recovery and late complications.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Prof Naveen Narayan
- Organization
- Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Prema Dhanraj, MS, MCh
Rajarajeshwari Medical College and Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 2, 2026
First Posted
January 22, 2026
Study Start
December 9, 2025
Primary Completion
February 26, 2026
Study Completion
March 3, 2026
Last Updated
March 30, 2026
Results First Posted
March 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- The data will be made available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary study results and will remain available for up to 5 years following publication.
- Access Criteria
- Access to the de-identified IPD will be granted to qualified researchers who submit a methodologically sound research proposal. Requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator and study steering committee. Data will be shared under a data-sharing agreement to ensure protection of participant confidentiality.
De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported for the primary and secondary outcomes of this study, including motor recovery scores (MRC grading), sensory assessment results, pain scores (VAS), patient-reported outcome measures (QuickDASH/LEFS), complication data, and relevant baseline demographic and procedural variables.