Preop Biomarkers as Outcome Predictors in 2 Stage Revision Surgery for PJI
ARKO-PJI
Identification of Pre-prosthetic Revision Markers Predictive of Outcome in Patients With Periprosthetic Infection
1 other identifier
observational
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
With the progressive ageing of the population, a significant increase in the incidence of skeletal fractures-particularly of the proximal femur-as well as degenerative conditions such as osteoarthritis has been observed, for which joint arthroplasty represents the treatment of choice. However, this procedure is not free from complications; beyond technical and mechanical issues related to potential implant malpositioning, one of the most feared is periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), which poses a major challenge in terms of clinical management and prognostic impact. Therapeutic strategies for PJI range from debridement with retention of the implant and exchange of modular components (DAIR/DAPRI) to complete implant removal with insertion of an articulating spacer, often followed by a subsequent reimplantation procedure. These approaches require prolonged antibiotic regimens, potentially exerting a negative effect on renal function, particularly in cases of extended exposure to nephrotoxic agents. Despite the clinical relevance of this issue, the current literature still provides limited evidence regarding the identification of inexpensive and readily available biomarkers capable of predicting treatment outcomes in PJI, especially in patients undergoing spacer implantation followed by reimplantation. Recent literature has increasingly explored the use of biomarkers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and others to characterize inflammatory and nutritional status, and to investigate possible associations between these markers and the outcomes of selected surgical procedures. The availability of predictive markers could optimize therapeutic management by reducing the risk of infection recurrence and improving postoperative risk stratification.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
January 23, 2026
December 1, 2025
11 months
January 14, 2026
January 22, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Biomarkers' capacity to predict the likelihood of prosthetic reimplantation
The ability of selected preoperative biomarkers (e.g., NLR, PLR) to predict reimplantation outcomes in patients undergoing two-stage revision procedures
From enrollment for at least one year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Acute kidney injury
From enrollment for at least one year
ADL/IADL
From enrollment for at least one year
SF-12
From enrollment for at least one year
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with PJI
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Diagnosis of an orthopaedic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)
- Surgical treatment
- Minimum follow-up of 12 months
- Written informed consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years
- Patients undergoing prosthetic revision without evidence of periprosthetic joint infection
- Treatment with antibiotic therapy alone (non-surgical management)
- Follow-up \< 12 months
- Incomplete dataset
- Lack of informed consent to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (16)
Tarabichi S, Lizcano JD, Abe EA, Goh GS, Baker CM, Parvizi J. Finding the Optimal Screening Test for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Study. J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8):1919-1925.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.030. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
PMID: 38452860BACKGROUNDJones IA, Wier J, Chen MS, Liu KC, Palmer R, Mayfield CK, Heckmann ND. Complete Blood Count Ratios Predict Adverse Events After Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Dec 15;32(24):e1315-e1323. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00184. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
PMID: 38861722BACKGROUNDBalato G, Ascione T, Festa E, Di Gennaro D, Pandolfo G, Pagliano P. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Neutrophils to Lymphocytes Ratio, Platelets to Lymphocytes Ratio, Monocytes to Lymphocytes Ratio, and Platelets to Mean Platelet Volume Ratio in Diagnosing Periprosthetic Knee Infections. Are Gender-Specific Cutoff Values Needed? J Arthroplasty. 2023 May;38(5):918-924. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.11.014. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
PMID: 36481284BACKGROUNDAscione T, Balato G, Pagliano P. Upcoming evidence in clinical practice of two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection. J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 May 18;25(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00767-1.
PMID: 38761247BACKGROUNDZhang QY, Li HX, Xie HQ, Liu LM, Chen L, Zeng Y. Identifying potential predictive indicators for reimplantation timing in two-stage revision: a meta-analysis and system review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 23;145(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05689-5.
PMID: 39714508BACKGROUNDKarlidag T, Zanna L, Mundhe A, Gehrke T, Citak M. Admission Lymphocyte-to-C-Reactive Protein Ratio Predicts 90-Day Adverse Outcomes Following Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2025 Nov 7:S0883-5403(25)01430-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.11.004. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41207340BACKGROUNDMuscaritoli M, Molfino A, Orlando S, Tambaro F. Assessing systemic inflammation and its prognostic value: Glasgow Prognostic Score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio or other options? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2025 Sep 1;28(5):367-372. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000001151. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
PMID: 40772508BACKGROUNDParvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, Higuera C, Della Valle C, Chen AF, Shohat N. The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1309-1314.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
PMID: 29551303BACKGROUNDMu W, Xu B, Wang F, Guo W, Zhang X, Cao L. Exploring Acute Kidney Injury Incidence in Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment With Combined Intravenous and Intra-articular Antibiotic Infusion. Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jan 27;31:101616. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101616. eCollection 2025 Feb.
PMID: 39931554BACKGROUNDVicenti G, Pesare E, Colasuonno G, Buono C, Albano F, Ladogana T, Passarelli AC, Solarino G. Debridement, Antibiotic Pearls, and Retention of the Implant (DAPRI) in the Treatment of Early Periprosthetic Knee Joint Infections: A Literature Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 16;12(8):843. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12080843.
PMID: 38667605BACKGROUNDPerdomo-Lizarraga JC, Combalia A, Fernandez-Valencia JA, Martinez-Pastor JC, Morata L, Soriano A, Munoz-Mahamud E. Long-term implant survival after debridement, antibiotics and implant Retention (DAIR) for acute prosthetic joint infections: is it a viable option beyond four weeks after index arthroplasty? Int Orthop. 2025 Mar;49(3):573-580. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06422-6. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
PMID: 39951052BACKGROUNDAyoade F, Li D, Mabrouk A, Todd JR. Periprosthetic Joint Infection. 2023 Oct 14. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448131/
PMID: 28846340BACKGROUNDLin S, Villa JM, Rajschmir K, Higuera CA, Grieco P. The Visual Assessment of Cup Position on Anteroposterior Pelvis Radiographs Before Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Instability Is Highly Deceiving. Orthopedics. 2025 Jan-Feb;48(1):e22-e26. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20241219-03. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
PMID: 39724076BACKGROUNDLi Z. Advancements of biomaterial in hip replacement technology incorporating ceramic materials. J Orthop. 2024 Oct 4;62:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.09.021. eCollection 2025 Apr.
PMID: 39473875BACKGROUNDEl Motassime A, Pesare E, Russo A, Salini S, Gava G, Recupero C, Giani T, Covino M, Maccauro G, Vitiello R. The Impact of Frailty and Gender Differences on Hospitalization and Complications in Proximal Femoral Pathological Fractures: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 18;14(9):991. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090991.
PMID: 39338245BACKGROUNDMatrangolo MR, Smimmo A, Vitiello R, De Fazio A, El Motassime A, Noia G, Minutillo F, Maccauro G. Predictor of hip fracture type: a systematic review. Acta Biomed. 2023 Jun 23;94(S2):e2023047. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94iS2.12572.
PMID: 37366194BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2026
First Posted
January 22, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12