Evaluation of the Efficacy of Neurofeedback Technique Based on EEG Desynchronization in Epileptic Patients
EPIFEED
Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study of the Evaluation of the Efficacy of Neurofeedback Technique Based on EEG Desynchronization in Pharmaco-resistant Epilepsy
2 other identifiers
interventional
22
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
A large proportion of patients (approximately 30%) with drug-resistant epilepsy are not eligible for surgical treatment. The alternatives that can be offered to reduce the frequency of seizures are neuromodulation (vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)). Most of these alternatives require invasive procedures and therefore carry risks. Neurofeedback (NFB) is a potential adjunctive treatment that allows patients to self-modulate brain activity and thus reduce seizure frequency in a non-invasive manner. This technique involves measuring neurophysiological activity using a technical interface to extract a parameter of interest, which is presented in real time to the participant, who has been trained and has learned how to modify it. NFB is of interest in various neurological and psychiatric diseases and can lead to improvement in mood disorders, which are frequently associated with epilepsy. Previous NFB methods in epilepsy aimed to modulate sensorimotor rhythms or slow cortical potentials. The investigators propose an innovative EEG-NFB paradigm based on real-time estimation of EEG functional connectivity (FC) measured on the scalp EEG (NFC-FC). This paradigm was developed based on previous studies demonstrating increased functional brain connectivity during the interictal period and decreased synchrony induced by VNS and transcranial electrical stimulation as a possible anti-epileptic mechanism. This study consists of a randomized, double-blind comparison between NFB-FC and sham-NFB (control). The effect of this functional connectivity-based NeuroFeedBack (NFB-FC) will be evaluated on the number of seizures before and after treatment, as well as on their severity and on criteria related to quality of life. In this study, two healthy volunteers will be recruited in order to generate the sham sessions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2029
January 21, 2026
December 1, 2025
2.6 years
September 27, 2025
January 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To evaluate the effect of NFB-FC training on seizure frequency
Comparison to the NFB-sham training calculated in the pre-training period of reference
3 months after the end of the training vs 3 months before training
Secondary Outcomes (11)
To compare between groups the psychiatric impact (depression and anxiety)
3-months after the end of the training
To compare between groups the cognitive impact
One year after inclusion
To compare between groups the quality of life
3-months after the end of the training to the pre-training period
To compare between groups the number of responders
3-months after the end of the training
To compare between groups the number of seizure-free patients
3-months after the end of the training
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
NFB-FC
EXPERIMENTALSham-NFB
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
The intervention will consist of 12 training sessions at the hospital conducted with the assistance of a nurse. Each session will last approximately 40 minutes, with two resting EEG phases at the beginning and end of the session. The NFB procedure will consist of 6 training blocks of 75 seconds separated by 15-second rest blocks and 15-second baseline blocks. The patient will then be required to practice what they have learned at home.
The intervention will consist of 12 training sessions at the hospital conducted with the assistance of a nurse. Each session will last approximately 40 minutes, with two resting EEG phases at the beginning and end of the session. The NFB procedure will consist of 6 training blocks of 75 seconds separated by 15-second rest blocks and 15-second baseline blocks. The patient will then be required to practice what they have learned at home.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patient between 18 and 65 years old
- Patient suffering from focal or multifocal drug-resistant epilepsy
- Patient having a number of seizures: at least 3 / month during the baseline
- Patient's IQ, which in the investigator's opinion will enable questionnaires and neuropsychological assessments to be carried out;
- Patient having stable medications for epilepsy 4 weeks before the baseline (except rescue treatment);
- Patient able to understand, speak and write in French;
- Patient willing to participate, and gave written consent to the study after receiving clear information
- Patient beneficiary or affiliated to a health insurance plan
You may not qualify if:
- \- Difficulty reading or understanding the French language or inability to understand information about the study
- Generalized epilepsy
- Major visual impairment incompatible with the realization of neurofeedback, based on investigator's opinion.
- Patient currently having psychogenic non-epileptic seizures
- Any condition that makes the study subject, in the opinion of the investigator, unsuitable for the study including presence of any disease, abnormality, medical or physical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may adversely impact, compromise, interfere, limit, affect or reduce the safety of the subject, the integrity of the data ; Person protected by articles L1121-5, L1121-6 of Public Health Code (pregnant or breastfeeding woman, deprived of liberty by judicial decision, situations of social fragility, adults unable or unable to express their consent, person under judicial safeguard (article L1122-2)).
- For healthy volunteers :
- Male or female of over 18 years of age
- IQ compatible with the realization of the study
- Patient able to understand, speak and write in French;
- Patient willing to participate, and gave written consent to the study after receiving clear information
- Subject beneficiary or affiliated to a health insurance plan
- Subject presenting any neurological or psychiatric illnesses.
- Subject having major visual impairment incompatible with the realization of neurofeedback, based on investigator's opinion.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2025
First Posted
January 21, 2026
Study Start
March 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 31, 2029
Last Updated
January 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share