Factors Affecting Attachment Loss in Clear Aligner Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
4
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective clinical study evaluated the incidence of composite attachment loss in patients undergoing clear aligner treatment and identified patient-, tooth-, and treatment-related factors associated with attachment debonding. Twenty-one patients were followed for six months, and attachment failures were recorded at routine visits. Outcomes were compared according to attachment type (conventional vs. optimized), attachment size, tooth type, dental arch, and patient-related factors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 12, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2026
CompletedJanuary 20, 2026
January 1, 2026
5 months
January 12, 2026
January 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Attachment Loss Rate
Proportion of composite attachments exhibiting complete detachment or partial debonding (irregular residual composite) during routine follow-up visits. Attachment loss was assessed by direct intraoral examination and tactile verification using a dental explorer.
6 months
Study Arms (1)
Clear Aligner Treatment
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received clear aligner therapy (Invisalign®) with composite attachments bonded according to the manufacturer's protocol. Both conventional and optimized attachment types were used as part of the planned orthodontic treatment, and attachment loss was prospectively evaluated over a 6-month follow-up period.
Interventions
Participants received clear aligner therapy (Invisalign®, Align Technology, San Jose, CA, USA). Composite attachments were bonded according to the manufacturer's protocol using a high-viscosity composite. Both conventional and optimized attachment types were used as part of the planned orthodontic treatment, and attachment loss was prospectively evaluated during a 6-month follow-up period.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Permanent dentition. Mild to moderate crowding. No history of previous orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances or clear aligners
You may not qualify if:
- Poor oral health. Bruxism. Crown restorations. Dental fluorosis. Enamel hypoplasia or other structural abnormalities affecting attachment bonding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bezmialem Vakif University
Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 12, 2026
First Posted
January 20, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 1, 2022
Study Completion
June 1, 2022
Last Updated
January 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share