Supervised vs Non-Supervised Incentive Spirometry After CABG
SIS-CABG
Comparison of Lung Function in Post-CABG Patients Administered Supervised and Non-supervised Post-operative Incentive Spirometry: a Quasi-experimental Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the effect of supervised incentive spirometry (SIS) compared to unsupervised incentive spirometry (Non-SIS) on pulmonary function in patients following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Participants perform incentive spirometry exercises twice daily for three days after extubation. Pulmonary function parameters, including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow (PEF), are assessed before and after the intervention period to compare changes between the two groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 15, 2026
CompletedJanuary 15, 2026
January 1, 2026
5 months
December 19, 2025
January 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
Measures the volume of air that can be forcibly exhaled in one second to assess pulmonary function in post-CABG patients.
T1 (24 hours post-extubation) and T2 (after 3 days of incentive spirometry exercise)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
T1 (24 hours post-extubation) and T2 (after 3 days of incentive spirometry exercise)
Other Outcomes (1)
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
T1 (24 hours post-extubation) and T2 (after 3 days of incentive spirometry exercise)
Study Arms (2)
Supervised Incentive Spirometry (SIS)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants perform incentive spirometry exercises twice daily for 3 days under direct supervision. The supervisor observes the technique, provides corrections, answers questions, and ensures adherence to the prescribed exercise regimen.
Non-Supervised Incentive Spirometry (Non-SIS)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants perform incentive spirometry exercises independently using a provided guideline form. Supervisors provide daily reminders but do not directly observe the exercises. Participants log their activity daily.
Interventions
Participants perform incentive spirometry exercises twice daily for 3 days under direct supervision. The supervisor monitors technique, corrects errors, answers questions, and ensures exercises are done accurately. Each session includes 6 sets of 5 breaths, with slow inhalation, 2-second breath-hold, and slow exhalation, separated by rest periods. This intervention is performed in addition to standard cardiac rehabilitation.
Exercises independently using a guideline form with daily reminders. Participants log activity. 6 sets of 5 breaths per session.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged ≥18 years.
- Patients who have undergone Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery.
- Mechanical ventilation \<24 hours post-surgery.
- Physically able to perform incentive spirometry (IS) exercises.
- Signed informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Hemodynamically unstable patients.
- Patients with cognitive or communication impairments.
- Oral abnormalities that prevent the use of IS.
- Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
- Patients with thoracic anomalies.
- Patients who required reintubation.
- History of incentive spirometry use within the last 3 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
RSUP Dr. Hasan Sadikin
Bandung, West Java, 40161, Indonesia
Related Publications (5)
Ababneh QM, Abdelrahman H, Abdelhameed ME. Effectiveness of Incentive Spirometry Versus Deep Breathing Exercises in Preventing Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Abdominal Surgery: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. 2025 Mar 6;17(3):e80149. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80149. eCollection 2025 Mar.
PMID: 40190855RESULTdo Nascimento Junior P, Modolo NS, Andrade S, Guimaraes MM, Braz LG, El Dib R. Incentive spirometry for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications in upper abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 8;2014(2):CD006058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006058.pub3.
PMID: 24510642RESULTAlwekhyan SA, Alshraideh JA, Yousef KM, Hayajneh F. Nurse-guided incentive spirometry use and postoperative pulmonary complications among cardiac surgery patients: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Pract. 2022 Apr;28(2):e13023. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13023. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
PMID: 34676618RESULTSu H, Zhang J, Liu Y, Peng H, Zhang L. Pre and postoperative nurse-guided incentive spirometry versus physiotherapist-guided pre and postoperative breathing exercises in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: An evaluation of postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 30;101(52):e32443. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032443.
PMID: 36596066RESULTMelly L, Torregrossa G, Lee T, Jansens JL, Puskas JD. Fifty years of coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1960-1967. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.43.
PMID: 29707352RESULT
Related Links
- Melly L, Torregrossa G, Lee T, Jansens JL, Puskas JD. Fifty years of coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(3):1960-7.
- Su H, Zhang J, Liu Y, Peng H, Zhang L. Pre and postoperative nurse-guided incentive spirometry vs. physiotherapist-guided breathing exercises in cardiac surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(52):e32443.
- Saja Ahmad Alwekhyan et al. Nurse-guided incentive spirometry use and postoperative pulmonary complications among cardiac surgery patients. Int J Nurs Pract. 2022;28(2):e13023.
- do Nascimento Junior P, Módolo NS, Andrade S, Guimarães MM, Braz LG, El Dib R. Incentive spirometry for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications in upper abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(2):CD006058.pub3.
- Ababneh QM et al. Effectiveness of Incentive Spirometry Versus Deep Breathing Exercises in Preventing Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Abdominal Surgery: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. 2025;17(3):e80149.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2025
First Posted
January 15, 2026
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
January 1, 2025
Last Updated
January 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01