High and Low Dose High-intensity Laser Therapy Lateral Epicondylitis
Comparison of the Effects of High and Low Dose High-intensity Laser Therapy in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
High-intensity laser therapy has gained increasing attention in recent years as a therapeutic modality. It is a non-invasive treatment that can reduce pain, increase local blood circulation, and promote tissue repair. The higher energy output of high-intensity laser therapy also have deeper tissue penetration. Several studies have investigated the effects of high-intensity laser therapy on lateral epicondylitis, and the existing literature indicates that, compared with other treatment modalities, high-intensity laser therapy is more effective in improving pain and quality of life in patients with lateral epicondylitis. However, the dosage, duration, and treatment frequency applied in previous studies vary considerably. The therapeutic effects of high-intensity laser therapy may therefore be influenced by treatment dosage. Consequently, the purpose of this study is to compare the effects of two different dosages of high-intensity laser therapy on patients with lateral epicondylitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 12, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 15, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 6, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 6, 2026
ExpectedJanuary 21, 2026
January 1, 2026
25 days
January 13, 2026
January 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain intensity
Using visual analog scale to measure pain intensity. Score from 0 to 10. Score 0 means no pain and score 10 indicates highest pain.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Grip strength
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Quality of life
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Conrol group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo high intensity laser therapy with Infarred ray and Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator therapy
Low dosage group
EXPERIMENTALLow dosage High intensity laser with Infarred ray and Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator therapy
High dosage group
EXPERIMENTALHigh dosage High intensity laser therapy with Infarred ray and Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator therapy
Interventions
Using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator on the affected area fior 15 minutes.
Using infarred ray therapy applying on affected area for 15 minutes.
Using high-intensity laser therapy applying on the affected area.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis by physician
- Disease duration of less than three months
- Adults aged above 18 years with full decision-making capacity
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have received treatments other than standard treatment to the affected area within past three months
- Patients with contraindication for rehabilitation therapy
- Photosensitivity
- Sensory impairment
- Implanted cardiac pacemaker
- Pregnancy
- Malignancy
- Patients with a history of surgery on the affected elbow
- Patients with cervical radiculopathy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
TSAI CHENG-TAO Physical Therapy Clinic
Kaohsiung City, 803, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2026
First Posted
January 15, 2026
Study Start
January 12, 2026
Primary Completion
February 6, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 6, 2026
Last Updated
January 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01