Planned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
June 15, 2027
Estimated
Planned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Brief Summary
Impaired balance or insufficient strength may increase the risk of musculoskeletal injuries among recreational enthusiasts. Warm-up protocols are an essential component of exercise preparation, aiming to enhance performance and reduce the risk of injury among physically active individuals.
Neuromuscular warm-up protocols are designed to stimulate the sensorimotor system by integrating balance, coordination, strength, and proprioceptive exercises. These protocols enhance neuromuscular control, joint stability, and muscle activation, which are critical for dynamic movements performed during gym-based training and functional activities.
Similarly, Conventional warm-up protocols consist of light aerobic activity and static or dynamic stretching. These protocols enhance blood flow and muscle flexibility.
Dynamic balance refers to the ability to maintain postural control while performing movement tasks and is a key determinant of athletic performance and injury prevention.
Strength is an essential component for functional performance and is commonly assessed through Counter jump movement tests.
This study aims to compare the effects of a neuromuscular warm-up versus a conventional warm-up on dynamic balance and strength among recreational gym enthusiasts. The findings may help create a more effective warm-up strategy for improving performance in recreational enthusiasts.
Registry Overview
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
Recruitment status
recruiting
Estimated enrollment
46 participants
Study completion date
June 15, 2027
Estimated
Planned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Listed locations
1 countries · 2 sites
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Related Scientific Literature
Loading related publications...
Study Timeline
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
First Submitted
January 5, 2026
Actual (reported)
First Posted
January 14, 2026
Actual (reported)
Study Start
January 14, 2026
Actual (reported)
Primary Completion
June 15, 2027
Estimated
Planned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
June 15, 2027
Estimated
Planned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Gym-GoersNeuromuscular Warm-upConventional Warm-upDynamic BalanceStrengthRecreational Gym Population
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Dynamic Balance
Dynamic balance will be measured using the Y-Balance Test (YBT).
The Y-Balance Test assesses dynamic postural control by measuring reach distance in three directions while maintaining single-leg stance. The test has demonstrated good to excellent reliability with an internal consistency of Cronbach's alpha (α) of approximately 0.91.
Y-Balance Test Directions:
1. Anterior Reach: \_\_\_\_\_\_ cm
2. Posteromedial Reach: \_\_\_\_\_\_ cm
3. Posterolateral Reach: \_\_\_\_\_\_ cm Composite Y-Balance Score: \_\_\_\_\_\_ % The composite score will be calculated by normalizing reach distances to limb length.
8 weeks
Strength
Lower limb strength will be measured using the Countermovement Jump (CMJ) Test. The CMJ test evaluates explosive lower extremity strength by measuring vertical jump height. The MyJump2 smartphone application has demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with a reported Cronbach's alpha (α) of approximately 0.99,This indicates high level of reliability for measuring counter movement jump(CMJ height)
Countermovement Jump Variables:
Jump Height: \_\_\_\_\_\_ cm
8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Neuromuscular Warm-up
EXPERIMENTAL
Participants in the experimental group performed a neuromuscular warm-up program, prior to their training , designed to improve dynamic balance, strength via YBT and vertical jump along with overall neuromuscular control before their regular gym workouts. This warm-up focused on coordinated, functional movements that challenge postural stability and promote efficient muscle activation. The program included progressive balance tasks, controlled strength exercises, agility drills, and dynamic stability activities aimed at activating the neuromuscular system in a purposeful manner. slight progression was made every week All sessions were supervised to ensure correct technique, appropriate progression and the participant safety throughout the intervention period
Behavioral: NM Warm-up
Conventional Warm-up
ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Participants in the control group performed a traditional warm-up routine that was different from the neuromuscular warm-up used in the experimental group. This approach mainly focused on getting the body ready for exercise by increasing heart rate and loosening the muscles, rather than improving neuromuscular control. Unlike the neuromuscular warm-up, this protocol did not include balance-challenging exercises, reactive movements, or tasks that required high levels of body awareness. The movements were simple and repetitive, with no added progression in difficulty, and were intended only to prepare participants physically before starting their regular gym workout.
The neuromuscular warm-up was performed four times per week for six weeks, with each session lasting approximately 10 to12 minutes at light to moderate intensity. The intervention consisted of single-leg balance exercises with reach tasks, bosu mini squats with controlled tempo, core stabilization exercises such as front and side planks, and agility-based movements including lateral shuffles and hops. Exercise difficulty was progressively increased by altering base of support, movement speed, and task complexity. The sequence was designed to improve motor control, balance reactions, and force production before the main workout. Dynamic balance and strength outcomes were assessed at baseline and after completion of the intervention.
Participants in the control group completed the conventional warm-up four times per week for six weeks, with each session lasting about 10 to 12 minutes. The warm-up began with light aerobic activity, such as treadmill jogging or stationary cycling, to gently raise heart rate and body temperature. This was followed by dynamic mobility and stretching exercises, including leg swings, arm circles, hip rotations, , body-weight squats, and dynamic stretches for the hamstrings and calves also of upper body dynamic stretches . Overall, the conventional warm-up aimed to prepare the muscles and joints for exercise but did not specifically target neuromuscular activation, balance, or movement control.
Conventional Warm-up
Willingness to attend all warmup sessions for 6 weeks
Recreationally Active individuals who participates in exercise for ≥4 times per week
Individuals who take part in Strength based training and perform closed kinematic chain exercises at least 2 times per week
You may not qualify if:
Any known cardiovascular, systemic illness that might hinder exercises
History of any injury or surgery in the past 6 months
Diagnosed neurological, musculoskeletal disorders
Participation in any competitive professional sports or athletic training
Planned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
June 15, 2027
Estimated
Planned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Last Updated
October 26, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-10
Data Sharing
IPD Sharing
Will share
After the Publication
Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
June 2026- October 2026
Source record
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.