Digital vs. Analog Inputs in CAD/CAM Orthodontics: A Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Palatal Expander Fabrication Workflow
1 other identifier
observational
36
1 country
2
Brief Summary
36 patients with unilateral or bilateral cross bite treated with hyrax expanders fabricated through three distinct workflows: fully conventional (physical impression + manual fabrication), hybrid (physical impression + CAD/CAM fabrication), and fully digital (intraoral scanning + CAD/CAM fabrication). To evaluate and compare the clinical fit, workflow efficiency, and patient/clinician satisfaction of palatal expanders fabricated using traditional, hybrid digital, and fully digital workflows.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Dec 2025
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 25, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 25, 2027
January 14, 2026
July 1, 2025
1.1 years
December 18, 2025
January 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Fit and accuracy of expander
For the clinical fit of the palatal expander at delivery, a 5-point Likert scale could be used by the clinician as follows: Score Description 1. Very poor fit - Significant rocking or instability; requires remake 2. Poor fit - Major adjustment required (e.g., soldering, bending) 3. Acceptable fit - Minor chairside adjustments needed 4. Good fit - Minimal adjustment required 5. Excellent fit - No adjustment needed, passive and accurate seating
Immediately after appliance insertion
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Workflow and Chairside adjustment time
Immediately after appliance insertion
Other Outcomes (1)
Expansion Efficacy
Through study completion, up to 3 months
Study Arms (3)
Fully Analogue Workflow
* Input: Physical impression. * Model: Poured in dental stone to produce physical model. * Fabrication: Hyrax expander fabricated manually by soldering/brazing components directly on the plaster cast using traditional laboratory techniques.
Hybrid Workflow
* Input: Physical impression * Model: Poured in dental stone to produce physical model. * Digitization: Desktop scanning of physical model * Fabrication: CAD-designed and 3D-printed appliance (Hyrax-type),
Fully Digital Workflow
* Input: Intraoral scan (IOS) using an optical scanner * Model: Virtual model used directly in design software. * Fabrication: CAD-designed and 3D-printed appliance (Hyrax-type),
Eligibility Criteria
A total of 36 participants will be selected from outpatient clinic of orthodontics department (Faculty of Dentistry - Mansoura University). Written consent will be obtained from all legal guardians prior to enrollment.
You may qualify if:
- Aged between 8 and 13 years with transverse maxillary deficiency ( with unilateral or bilateral crossbite ,with or without anterior cross bite)
- Indicated for tooth-borne maxillary expansion
- Good oral hygiene and cooperative behavior
- No prior orthodontic treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Craniofacial anomalies or syndromes
- Requirement for surgically assisted expansion
- Poor oral hygiene or high caries index
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
faculty of dentistry , Mansoura university
Al Mansurah, 35516, Egypt
faculty of dentistry , Mansoura university
Al Mansurah, Egypt
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2025
First Posted
January 14, 2026
Study Start
December 25, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 25, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 25, 2027
Last Updated
January 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP
- Time Frame
- 3 years
- Access Criteria
- by request
data with request