HVNI vs CPAP in Children With Acute Respiratory Distress
P-HVNI-CPAP
Assessment of Outcome and Tolerability of High Velocity Nasal Insufflation and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Children With Acute Respiratory Distress
2 other identifiers
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute breathing problems are a common reason for children to be admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit, and many of these children need breathing support without a breathing tube. High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) and nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) are commonly used to help children breathe, but there is limited information comparing how well they work and how comfortable they are for children. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and tolerability of HVNI and nCPAP in children aged 1 month to 5 years with acute respiratory distress admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit, using clinical assessment and lung ultrasound findings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 9, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2026
CompletedJanuary 27, 2026
January 1, 2023
1.9 years
December 14, 2025
January 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in lung aeration assessed by lung ultrasound score
To compare the effectiveness of High Velocity Nasal Insufflation versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in improving lung aeration in children with acute respiratory distress, assessed by daily lung ultrasound score during PICU stay. The LUS ranges from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate worse lung aeration and lower scores indicate improvement.
At Baseline, pre procedural , 48 hours .
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Clinical improvement of respiratory distress assessed by Modified Respiratory Distress Score
Baseline and 48 hours after initiation of respiratory support
Study Arms (2)
High Velocity Nasal Insufflation (HVNI)
ACTIVE COMPARATORChildren aged 1 month to 5 years with acute respiratory distress admitted to the PICU will receive respiratory support using High Velocity Nasal Insufflation after failure of low-flow oxygen therapy. Outcomes and tolerability will be assessed clinically and by daily lung ultrasound score during PICU stay.
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (Nasal CPAP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORChildren aged 1 month to 5 years with acute respiratory distress admitted to the PICU will receive respiratory support using nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure after failure of low-flow oxygen therapy. Outcomes and tolerability will be assessed clinically and by daily lung ultrasound score during PICU stay.
Interventions
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure will be delivered via nasal interface providing continuous positive airway pressure with supplemental oxygen to children aged 1 month to 5 years with acute respiratory distress who failed low-flow oxygen therapy. Settings will be adjusted according to clinical response and institutional PICU protocol. Patients will be monitored clinically and by daily lung ultrasound score during PICU stay.
High Velocity Nasal Insufflation will be delivered using a heated, humidified nasal cannula system to children aged 1 month to 5 years with acute respiratory distress who failed low-flow oxygen therapy. Therapy will be initiated and adjusted according to clinical condition and institutional PICU protocol. Patients will be monitored clinically and by daily lung ultrasound score during PICU stay.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 1 month to 5 years
- Admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU)
- Diagnosed with acute respiratory distress
- Failure of low-flow nasal oxygen therapy
- Requiring non-invasive respiratory support
- Informed consent obtained from parent or legal guardian
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of congenital or acquired cardiac disease
- Neuromuscular disorders
- Chronic lung disease
- History of recurrent wheezing
- History of cardio-respiratory arrest
- Presence of significant comorbid chronic illness
- Contraindication to non-invasive ventilation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pediatric Intensive Care Units, Children Hospital, Ain shams university
Cairo, 00002, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Liu C, Cheng WY, Li JS, Tang T, Tan PL, Yang L. High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy for the Treatment of Children <2 Years With Mild to Moderate Respiratory Failure Due to Pneumonia. Front Pediatr. 2020 Nov 13;8:590906. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.590906. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 33304868RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tarek A. Abdelgawad, MD
Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2025
First Posted
January 13, 2026
Study Start
January 9, 2023
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plan to share