Effect of IV Lidocaine on Duodenal Peristalsis and Sedation in ERCP
LIDO ERCP
Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Duodenal Peristalsis, Sedation Quality and Rescue Spasmolytic Requirement in ERCP Procedures: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusion on duodenal peristalsis during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The study compares lidocaine against a placebo to determine if lidocaine can reduce the need for rescue spasmolytics (hyoscine-N-butylbromide or glucagon), decrease propofol consumption, and improve hemodynamic stability.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 12, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 11, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 11, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2026
CompletedApril 8, 2026
February 1, 2026
Same day
December 30, 2025
April 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rescue Spasmolytic Requirement Rate
The proportion of patients requiring rescue medication (Hyoscine-N-butylbromide or Glucagon) due to severe duodenal spasm preventing cannulation.
Intraoperative (During the ERCP procedure, approx. 30 minutes)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Total Propofol Consumption
From induction until the end of the procedure
Other Outcomes (4)
Endoscopist Satisfaction Score
From induction until the end of the procedure
Incidence of Sedation-Related Adverse Events
From induction until the end of the procedure
Incidence of Significant Procedural Interference
From induction until the end of the procedure
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lidocaine Group
EXPERIMENTAL1.0 mg/kg IV bolus followed by 2.0 mg/kg/h IV infusion during the procedure.
Placebo Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORIV bolus and infusion of 0.9% NaCl matched in volume and rate to the study drug.
Interventions
1.0 mg/kg IV bolus followed by 2.0 mg/kg/h IV infusion during the procedure. Propofol Induction: 0.5-1 mg/kg loading dose, Maintenance: Continuous infusion of 40-60 µg/kg/min, supplemented by intermittent 20-30 mg boluses as clinically required.
IV bolus and infusion of 0.9% NaCl matched in volume and rate to the study drug. Propofol Induction: 0.5-1 mg/kg loading dose, Maintenance: Continuous infusion of 40-60 µg/kg/min, supplemented by intermittent 20-30 mg boluses as clinically required..
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for elective ERCP.
- ASA Physical Status I, II, or III.
- Age between 18 and 85 years.
- Provided written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to amide-type local anesthetics.
- Severe hepatic or renal failure.
- History of AV block or severe cardiac arrhythmia.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Chronic opioid use.
- Patient refusal.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, 06610, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Suzuki M, Sekino Y, Hosono K, Kurita Y, Uechi H, Kuzuu K, Uchiyama S, Kawana K, Nagase H, Kubota K, Yoneda M, Nakajima A. Inhibitory Effect of Lidocaine on Duodenal Peristalsis During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial (With Video). DEN Open. 2025 Nov 27;6(1):e70252. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70252. eCollection 2026 Apr.
PMID: 41321955BACKGROUNDAbrahams M, Derby R, Horn JL. Update on Ultrasound for Truncal Blocks: A Review of the Evidence. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):275-88. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000372.
PMID: 26866299BACKGROUNDBusch R, Murti K, Liu J, Patra AK, Muhammad K, Knobeloch KP, Lichtinger M, Bonifer C, Wortge S, Waisman A, Reifenberg K, Ellenrieder V, Serfling E, Avots A. NFATc1 releases BCL6-dependent repression of CCR2 agonist expression in peritoneal macrophages from Saccharomyces cerevisiae infected mice. Eur J Immunol. 2016 Mar;46(3):634-46. doi: 10.1002/eji.201545925. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
PMID: 26631626BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Asist Prof Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2025
First Posted
January 12, 2026
Study Start
February 11, 2026
Primary Completion
February 11, 2026
Study Completion
March 15, 2026
Last Updated
April 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
"Individual participant data will not be shared due to privacy concerns and the lack of a dedicated data management infrastructure to ensure secure anonymization.