NCT07333859

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusion on duodenal peristalsis during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The study compares lidocaine against a placebo to determine if lidocaine can reduce the need for rescue spasmolytics (hyoscine-N-butylbromide or glucagon), decrease propofol consumption, and improve hemodynamic stability.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2026

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 30, 2025

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 12, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 11, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 11, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 15, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

December 30, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

lidocainePeristalsisIntravenous Anesthesiadeep sedationDuodenoscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rescue Spasmolytic Requirement Rate

    The proportion of patients requiring rescue medication (Hyoscine-N-butylbromide or Glucagon) due to severe duodenal spasm preventing cannulation.

    Intraoperative (During the ERCP procedure, approx. 30 minutes)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Total Propofol Consumption

    From induction until the end of the procedure

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Endoscopist Satisfaction Score

    From induction until the end of the procedure

  • Incidence of Sedation-Related Adverse Events

    From induction until the end of the procedure

  • Incidence of Significant Procedural Interference

    From induction until the end of the procedure

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Lidocaine Group

EXPERIMENTAL

1.0 mg/kg IV bolus followed by 2.0 mg/kg/h IV infusion during the procedure.

Drug: Lidocaine Hydrochloride 2%

Placebo Group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

IV bolus and infusion of 0.9% NaCl matched in volume and rate to the study drug.

Other: 0.9 % Normal Saline

Interventions

1.0 mg/kg IV bolus followed by 2.0 mg/kg/h IV infusion during the procedure. Propofol Induction: 0.5-1 mg/kg loading dose, Maintenance: Continuous infusion of 40-60 µg/kg/min, supplemented by intermittent 20-30 mg boluses as clinically required.

Lidocaine Group

IV bolus and infusion of 0.9% NaCl matched in volume and rate to the study drug. Propofol Induction: 0.5-1 mg/kg loading dose, Maintenance: Continuous infusion of 40-60 µg/kg/min, supplemented by intermittent 20-30 mg boluses as clinically required..

Placebo Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for elective ERCP.
  • ASA Physical Status I, II, or III.
  • Age between 18 and 85 years.
  • Provided written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergy to amide-type local anesthetics.
  • Severe hepatic or renal failure.
  • History of AV block or severe cardiac arrhythmia.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Chronic opioid use.
  • Patient refusal.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara Bilkent City Hospital

Ankara, 06610, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Suzuki M, Sekino Y, Hosono K, Kurita Y, Uechi H, Kuzuu K, Uchiyama S, Kawana K, Nagase H, Kubota K, Yoneda M, Nakajima A. Inhibitory Effect of Lidocaine on Duodenal Peristalsis During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial (With Video). DEN Open. 2025 Nov 27;6(1):e70252. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70252. eCollection 2026 Apr.

    PMID: 41321955BACKGROUND
  • Abrahams M, Derby R, Horn JL. Update on Ultrasound for Truncal Blocks: A Review of the Evidence. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):275-88. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000372.

    PMID: 26866299BACKGROUND
  • Busch R, Murti K, Liu J, Patra AK, Muhammad K, Knobeloch KP, Lichtinger M, Bonifer C, Wortge S, Waisman A, Reifenberg K, Ellenrieder V, Serfling E, Avots A. NFATc1 releases BCL6-dependent repression of CCR2 agonist expression in peritoneal macrophages from Saccharomyces cerevisiae infected mice. Eur J Immunol. 2016 Mar;46(3):634-46. doi: 10.1002/eji.201545925. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

    PMID: 26631626BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

LidocaineSaline Solution

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Asist Prof Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2025

First Posted

January 12, 2026

Study Start

February 11, 2026

Primary Completion

February 11, 2026

Study Completion

March 15, 2026

Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

"Individual participant data will not be shared due to privacy concerns and the lack of a dedicated data management infrastructure to ensure secure anonymization.

Locations