Comparative Effects of Modified Tabata Training and Fartlek Training in Amateur Football
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Football requires players to excel in both high-intensity, fast-paced actions and slower moments of rest, which demand a range of well-developed motor skills, including power, endurance and strength. Endurance enables players to maintain prolonged physical effort without diminishing performance, a necessity given the sport's demand for players to cover 9-14 km per game, with up to 15% of this distance covered in high-intensity sprints. Strength is also crucial, helping players perform actions such as jumping, pushing during sprints, and maintaining stability, all of which enhance performance and resilience on the field. To adapt to the changing physical demands of football, training methods like treadmill sprint training and fartlek training (FT) are commonly used, each with different impacts on physiological development. Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the effects of treadmill sprint training and fartlek training on leg press strength, power and endurance on amateur football players. Methodology: A sample size of 42 football players will be randomly allocated to either fartlek training group or modified Tabata training group. A typical fartlek session begins with a warm-up, followed by intervals of intense effort (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 3, 2 minute hard and moderate runs) with recovery periods (2 minutes) in between, then concludes with a cool-down. This 2, 3, 4, 3, 2 interval set helps athletes improve endurance, strength and power and adapt to varied game-like conditions. The Modified Tabata training Program that will be carried out for 3 sessions per week over 6 weeks is as follows: there will be 3 training sessions in a week. In first two weeks, the 24-minute session will be divided into 6 sets, each set lasting 4 minutes consist of 8 rounds, with a 2-minute rest period between each set. The 4 minute exercise duration will consist of a work-to-rest ratio of 20 seconds of work and 10 seconds of rest. The level of exercise progressively increased throughout the 6-week program, by increasing the set of exercise Outcome measures in the both groups will be assessed by Squats test, Vertical jump test,3-min step up test and Yo-Yo Intermittent recovery test . All these measures will be taken at the baseline and again after 6 weeks of training to assess the effectiveness of the training program and the resulting improvements in strength, power, and endurance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 21, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 5, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 29, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 12, 2026
CompletedJanuary 12, 2026
December 1, 2025
11 months
December 29, 2025
December 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Squat Test
The squats test was used to assess the strength of the lower limbs, clearly indicating the players' ability to generate force through their legs, which is crucial for movements such as sprinting and jumping in football.
6 weeks
Vertical Jump Test
The vertical jump test was utilized to measure explosive power, an essential component for effective performance in football, as it directly relates to a players ability to jump for headers or evade opponents.
6 weeks
3-minute step-up Test
To measure cardiovascular endurance, 3-minute step-up test was used, which evaluates the players' ability to sustain activity over time, reflecting their cardiovascular fitness and stamina on the field.
6 weeks
YoYo intermittent recovery Test
To Measure speed Endurance, YoYo intermittent recovery test was used, which evaluate the athlete´s speed endurance, aerobic capacity and fitness level. By completing YoYo intermittent recovery test, players demonstrate their ability to sustain intense physical activity, change direction quickly and maintain speed.
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Group A
EXPERIMENTAL40 Participants will be in Group A. They will Perform Modified Tabata Training.
Group B
ACTIVE COMPARATOR40 participant will be Group B. They will perform Fartlek Training.
Interventions
The Modified Tabata training Program that will be carried out for 3 sessions per week over 6 weeks is as follows: there will be 3 training sessions in a week. In first two weeks, the 24-minute session will be divided into 6 sets, each set lasting 4 minutes consist of 8 rounds, with a 2-minute rest period between each set. The 4 minute exercise duration will consist of a work-to-rest ratio of 20 seconds of work and 10 seconds of rest
fartlek session begins with a warm-up, followed by intervals of intense effort (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 3, 2 minute hard and moderate runs) with recovery periods (2 minutes) in between, then concludes with a cool-down.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Young Male football player aged 18-25 years.
- Amateur football players (who are in practice from last 8 months)
- Athletes with BMI 18.5kg/m2 -24.9kg/m2.
- Engages in other physical activities (e.g., gym, running) at least weekly.
- The participants not taking any supplements or steroids.
You may not qualify if:
- The participants with a history of a severe injury (e.g. ACL tear, fracture ) in the last 6 months.
- History of any lower limb surgery (e.g., ACL reconstruction or any major surgery)
- Any musculoskeletal disorder.
- Chronic respiratory conditions (e.g., COPD, severe asthma) affecting exercise capacity.
- Significant weight fluctuations in the past 3 months.
- Any diagnosed psychological and cardiovascular conditions that could affect participation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Al Mussadiq Institute of Higher Education
Kharian, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Related Publications (6)
Chaouachi A, Brughelli M, Chamari K, Levin GT, Ben Abdelkrim N, Laurencelle L, Castagna C. Lower limb maximal dynamic strength and agility determinants in elite basketball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Aug;23(5):1570-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a4e7f0.
PMID: 19620905BACKGROUNDBret C, Rahmani A, Dufour AB, Messonnier L, Lacour JR. Leg strength and stiffness as ability factors in 100 m sprint running. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2002 Sep;42(3):274-81.
PMID: 12094115BACKGROUNDHori N, Newton RU, Andrews WA, Kawamori N, McGuigan MR, Nosaka K. Does performance of hang power clean differentiate performance of jumping, sprinting, and changing of direction? J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Mar;22(2):412-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318166052b.
PMID: 18550955BACKGROUNDNowak M, Szymanek-Pilarczyk M, Stolarczyk A, Oleksy L, Muracki J, Wasik J. Normative and limit values of speed, endurance and power tests results of young football players. Front Physiol. 2025 Jan 8;15:1502694. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1502694. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39844899BACKGROUNDDi Giminiani R, Visca C. Explosive strength and endurance adaptations in young elite soccer players during two soccer seasons. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 13;12(2):e0171734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171734. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28192512BACKGROUNDModric T, Versic S, Sekulic D. Position Specific Running Performances in Professional Football (Soccer): Influence of Different Tactical Formations. Sports (Basel). 2020 Dec 10;8(12):161. doi: 10.3390/sports8120161.
PMID: 33321874BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Afifa Tariq
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The Outcome Assessors are Blind
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 29, 2025
First Posted
January 12, 2026
Study Start
November 21, 2024
Primary Completion
October 5, 2025
Study Completion
November 5, 2025
Last Updated
January 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share