Ultrasound-Guided Interfascial Hydrodissection for Gluteal Myofascial Pain in Piriformis Syndrome: A Prospective Study
Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Interfascial Hydrodissection for Myofascial Pain Syndrome of the Gluteus Maximus in Patients With Piriformis Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized, double-blind prospective trial investigates whether ultrasound-guided interfascial hydrodissection using 10% dextrose is more effective than dry needling in treating gluteal myofascial pain coexisting with piriformis syndrome. Following diagnostic piriformis injection response, eligible patients will be randomized into two treatment arms and followed at 1 hour, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. The primary hypothesis is that interfascial hydrodissection will provide superior long-term analgesic outcomes due to fascial separation, neuromodulation, and nociceptor suppression.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 26, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 28, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 28, 2026
March 13, 2026
March 1, 2026
3 months
December 24, 2025
March 11, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Intensity Assessed by Numeric Rating Scale
Pain intensity is assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) for pain at rest, during activity, at night, while standing, sitting, lying down, and for overall pain.
3 months after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pain Intensity Assessed by Numeric Rating Scale
1 week after the intervention
Pain Intensity Assessed by Numeric Rating Scale
1 month after the intervention
Study Arms (2)
Ultrasound-Guided Interfascial Hydrodissection
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound-guided interfascial hydrodissection is performed in the interfascial space between the gluteus maximus and piriformis muscles.
Ultrasound-guided gluteus maximus dry needling
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive ultrasound-guided dry needling applied to the gluteus maximus muscle.
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided interfascial hydrodissection is performed in the interfascial plane between the gluteus maximus and piriformis muscles.
Ultrasound-guided dry needling is performed on the gluteus maximus muscle without fluid administration.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 to 75 years
- Buttock pain with or without radiation to the lower extremity
- Ability to understand and provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Active lumbar radiculopathy
- History of hip joint pathology or prior hip surgery
- Previous injection or dry needling treatment to the gluteal region within the last 3 months
- Coagulation disorders or use of anticoagulant therapy
- Pregnancy
- Local infection at the injection site
- Inability to complete the study protocol or attend follow-up visits.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine
Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Tantanatip A, Patisumpitawong W, Lee S. Comparison of the Effects of Physiologic Saline Interfascial and Lidocaine Trigger Point Injections in Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Mar 9;3(2):100119. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100119. eCollection 2021 Jun.
PMID: 34179755RESULTMisirlioglu TO, Akgun K, Palamar D, Erden MG, Erbilir T. Piriformis syndrome: comparison of the effectiveness of local anesthetic and corticosteroid injections: a double-blinded, randomized controlled study. Pain Physician. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):163-71.
PMID: 25794202RESULTKaga M, Ueda T. Effectiveness of Hydro-Dissection of the Piriformis Muscle Plus Low-Dose Local Anesthetic Injection for Piriformis Syndrome: A Report of 2 Cases. Am J Case Rep. 2022 Feb 6;23:e935346. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.935346.
PMID: 35124689RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Physician, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 24, 2025
First Posted
January 8, 2026
Study Start
March 26, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 28, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 28, 2026
Last Updated
March 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03