Study Comparing Fexuprazan and Esomeprazole in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Symptom Relief and Safety After Using Fexuprazan 40 Mg Compared to Esomeprazole 40 Mg in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
1 other identifier
interventional
145
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fexuprazan 40 mg for relieving symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in adults. The study also compared fexuprazan with esomeprazole 40 mg, a commonly used treatment for GERD. The main questions this study aimed to answer were:
- Did fexuprazan reduce GERD symptoms such as heartburn and acid regurgitation?
- Was fexuprazan safe and well tolerated compared with esomeprazole? Researchers compared fexuprazan with esomeprazole to determine whether fexuprazan provided similar symptom relief and safety. Participants in the study:
- Were randomly assigned to receive fexuprazan 40 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg once daily
- Took the study medication for 4 weeks, with treatment extended up to 8 weeks if symptoms did not improve
- Attended scheduled clinic visits for evaluations
- Completed symptom questionnaires and a daily symptom diary
- Were monitored for side effects and overall safety throughout the study
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Aug 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 28, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2026
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 24, 2026
CompletedAugust 24, 2026
May 1, 2026
3 months
December 17, 2025
May 14, 2026
July 1, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Participants With Symptom Relief at Week 4 (GERD-Q Score <8)
Symptom relief was assessed using the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERD-Q). The GERD-Q total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 18, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome (greater severity and higher likelihood of GERD). The primary outcome was defined as the proportion of participants with a GERD-Q total score \<8 at Week 4, indicating adequate relief of GERD symptoms.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Proportion of Participants With Symptom Relief at Week 8 (GERD-Q Score <8)
8 weeks
Time to Complete Symptom Response After First Dose
From first dose until achievement of complete response, up to 8 weeks
Number of Participants Without Major GERD Symptoms
Up to 8 weeks
Percentage of Days Free of Major GERD Symptoms
Up to 8 weeks
Change From Baseline in GERD-Q Total Score
Baseline up to 8 weeks (Evaluated at 7 days, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Number of Participants With Relief From Chronic Cough
Up to 8 weeks
Number of Participants With Relief of Throat Irritation Sensation
Up to 8 weeks
Number of Participants Without Nocturnal GERD Symptoms
Up to 8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Fexuprazan 40 mg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to this arm received fexuprazan 40 mg, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), administered orally once daily. The initial treatment period was 4 weeks. Participants who did not achieve adequate symptom relief after the initial treatment period continued treatment with fexuprazan 40 mg for an additional 4 weeks, for a maximum treatment duration of 8 weeks. Treatment adherence and safety were monitored throughout the study period according to the protocol.
Esomeprazole 40 mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants assigned to this arm received esomeprazole 40 mg, a proton pump inhibitor, administered orally once daily. The initial treatment period was 4 weeks. Participants who did not achieve adequate symptom relief after the initial treatment period continued treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg for an additional 4 weeks, for a maximum treatment duration of 8 weeks. Treatment adherence and safety were monitored throughout the study period according to the protocol.
Interventions
Fexuprazan was administered orally at a dose of 40 mg once daily. Participants received treatment for an initial period of 4 weeks. Participants who did not achieve adequate symptom relief after the initial treatment period continued treatment with fexuprazan for an additional 4 weeks, for a maximum treatment duration of 8 weeks.
Esomeprazole was administered orally at a dose of 40 mg once daily. Participants received treatment for an initial period of 4 weeks. Participants who did not achieve adequate symptom relief after the initial treatment period continued treatment with esomeprazole for an additional 4 weeks, for a maximum treatment duration of 8 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 to 60 years at the time of providing written informed consent
- Male or female participants
- History of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms, including heartburn and/or acid regurgitation
- GERD symptoms confirmed by:
- GERD-Q score greater than 7, and
- Heartburn and/or acid regurgitation occurring on more than 3 days within the last 7 days
- Able to understand the study procedures and complete questionnaires and a daily symptom diary
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Gastrointestinal conditions:
- Diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis), primary esophageal motility disorders, or pancreatitis
- History of gastric or esophageal surgery affecting acid secretion (except appendectomy, cholecystectomy, or endoscopic polypectomy of benign polyps)
- Alarm symptoms suggestive of gastrointestinal malignancy (e.g., severe dysphagia, odynophagia, gastrointestinal bleeding, anemia, unexplained weight loss), unless malignancy was ruled out
- Medical history
- Clinically significant hepatic, renal, endocrine, hematologic, oncologic, or urinary system disease
- History of malignancy within the past 5 years (except non-digestive malignancies that were completely treated with no recurrence for ≥5 years)
- History of psychosis, substance abuse, or alcohol abuse
- Known HIV infection, active hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection (HCV RNA-positive)
- Medication and treatment
- Use of prohibited concomitant medications within 2 weeks prior to enrollment or need for continuous prohibited medication during the study, including:
- Proton pump inhibitors, potassium-competitive acid blockers, H2-receptor antagonists, or other acid-suppressive agents
- Certain psychotropic drugs, anticholinergic drugs, antispasmodics, systemic steroids, or mucoprotective agents
- Use of another investigational product within 4 weeks prior to study drug administration
- Laboratory findings
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Indonesia Universitylead
- Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co. LTD.collaborator
Study Sites (3)
Menteng Mitra Afia Jakarta Hospital
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, 10340, Indonesia
RS Islam Jakarta Cempaka Putih
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, 10510, Indonesia
RS Universitas Indonesia
Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia
Related Publications (26)
Yang AY, Yoo H, Shin W, Lee YS, Lee H, Kim SE, Kim A. Size-reduced fexuprazan 20 mg demonstrated the optimal bioavailability and bioequivalence with the reference formulation. Transl Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Mar;31(1):40-48. doi: 10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e3. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
PMID: 37034124BACKGROUNDLaine L, Sharma P, Mulford DJ, Hunt B, Leifke E, Smith N, Howden CW. Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of the Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Vonoprazan and the Proton Pump Inhibitor Lansoprazole in US Subjects. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 1;117(7):1158-1161. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001735. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
PMID: 35294415BACKGROUNDShin W, Yang AY, Park H, Lee H, Yoo H, Kim A. A Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study of Fexuprazan 10 mg: Demonstrating Bioequivalence with the Reference Formulation and Evaluating Steady State. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;16(8):1141. doi: 10.3390/ph16081141.
PMID: 37631056BACKGROUNDKim GH, Choi MG, Kim JI, Lee ST, Chun HJ, Lee KL, Choi SC, Jang JY, Lee YC, Kim JG, Kim KB, Shim KN, Sohn CI, Kim SK, Kim SG, Jang JS, Kim N, Jung HY, Park H, Huh KC, Lee KJ, Hong SJ, Baek S, Han JJ, Lee OY. Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan in Patients with Acute or Chronic Gastritis. Gut Liver. 2023 Nov 15;17(6):884-893. doi: 10.5009/gnl220457. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
PMID: 36789577BACKGROUNDKim SI, Lee YC, Cha W, Jung AR, Jang JY, Choi JS, Lee DK, Lee HH, Kwon MS, Lee YS, Eun YG. Efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in patients with symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;281(11):5873-5883. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08877-6. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
PMID: 39115573BACKGROUNDZhuang Q, Liao A, He Q, Liu C, Zheng C, Li X, Liu Y, Wang B, Liu S, Zhang Y, Lin R, Chen H, Deng M, Tang Y, He C, Dai W, Tang H, Gong L, Li L, Xu B, Yang C, Zhou B, Su D, Guo Q, Li B, Zhou Y, Wang X, Fei S, Wu H, Wei S, Peng Z, Wang J, Li Y, Wang H, Deng T, Ding S, Li F, Chen M, Xiao Y. The efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in treating erosive esophagitis: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Apr;39(4):658-666. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16471. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
PMID: 38251791BACKGROUNDKang N, Kang MG, Lee SE, Kang SY, Jo EJ, Lee JH, Kim SH, Bahn JW, Lee BJ, Song WJ. Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan Versus Esomeprazole for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Related Chronic Cough: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Exploratory Trial. Lung. 2025 Apr 29;203(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s00408-025-00815-5.
PMID: 40299084BACKGROUNDWon H, Kim E, Chae J, Lee H, Cho JY, Jang IJ, Chung JY, Kim MG, Lee S. Pharmacokinetic interactions between fexuprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in healthy males. Clin Transl Sci. 2024 May;17(5):e13798. doi: 10.1111/cts.13798.
PMID: 38700290BACKGROUNDOh J, Yang E, Jang IJ, Lee H, Yoo H, Chung JY, Lee S, Oh J. Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions between Fexuprazan, a Novel Potassium-Competitive Inhibitor, and Aspirin, in Healthy Subjects. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 7;15(2):549. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020549.
PMID: 36839870BACKGROUNDHwang JG, Jeon I, Park SA, Lee A, Yu KS, Jang IJ, Lee S. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DWP14012 (fexuprazan) in healthy subjects with different ethnicities. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Dec;52(11-12):1648-1657. doi: 10.1111/apt.16131. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
PMID: 33111337BACKGROUNDSunwoo J, Oh J, Moon SJ, Ji SC, Lee SH, Yu KS, Kim HS, Lee A, Jang IJ. Safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DWP14012, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jul;48(2):206-218. doi: 10.1111/apt.14818. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
PMID: 29863280BACKGROUNDLee SP, Sung IK, Lee OY, Choi MG, Huh KC, Jang JY, Chun HJ, Kwon JG, Kim GH, Kim N, Rhee PL, Kim SG, Jung HY, Lee JS, Lee YC, Jung HK, Kim JG, Kim SK, Sohn CI. Randomized Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan According to the Timing of Dosing in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025 Jan 31;31(1):86-94. doi: 10.5056/jnm24032. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
PMID: 39667898BACKGROUNDHafiz RA, Wong C, Paynter S, David M, Peeters G. The Risk of Community-Acquired Enteric Infection in Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Jul;52(7):613-622. doi: 10.1177/1060028018760569. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
PMID: 29457492BACKGROUNDStrand DS, Kim D, Peura DA. 25 Years of Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Comprehensive Review. Gut Liver. 2017 Jan 15;11(1):27-37. doi: 10.5009/gnl15502.
PMID: 27840364BACKGROUNDRettura F, Bronzini F, Campigotto M, Lambiase C, Pancetti A, Berti G, Marchi S, de Bortoli N, Zerbib F, Savarino E, Bellini M. Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Management Update. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 1;8:765061. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.765061. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34790683BACKGROUNDKim SE, Kim N, Oh S, Kim HM, Park MI, Lee DH, Jung HC. Predictive factors of response to proton pump inhibitors in korean patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Jan 1;21(1):69-77. doi: 10.5056/jnm14078.
PMID: 25537676BACKGROUNDWeijenborg PW, Cremonini F, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. PPI therapy is equally effective in well-defined non-erosive reflux disease and in reflux esophagitis: a meta-analysis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Aug;24(8):747-57, e350. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01888.x. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
PMID: 22309489BACKGROUNDYadlapati R, Gyawali CP, Pandolfino JE; CGIT GERD Consensus Conference Participants. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Personalized Approach to the Evaluation and Management of GERD: Expert Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 May;20(5):984-994.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.01.025. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
PMID: 35123084BACKGROUNDASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Desai M, Ruan W, Thosani NC, Amaris M, Scott JS, Saeed A, Abu Dayyeh B, Canto MI, Abidi W, Alipour O, Amateau SK, Cosgrove N, Elhanafi SE, Forbes N, Kohli DR, Kwon RS, Fujii-Lau LL, Machicado JD, Marya NB, Ngamruengphong S, Pawa S, Sheth SG, Thiruvengadam NR, Qumseya BJ; ASGE Standards of Practice Committee Chair. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the diagnosis and management of GERD: summary and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Feb;101(2):267-284. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.008. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
PMID: 39692638BACKGROUNDZhang D, Liu S, Li Z, Wang R. Global, regional and national burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease, 1990-2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):1372-1384. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2074535.
PMID: 35579516BACKGROUNDShaqran TM, Ismaeel MM, Alnuaman AA, Al Ahmad FA, Albalawi GA, Almubarak JN, AlHarbi RS, Alaqidi RS, AlAli YA, Alfawaz KS, Daghriri AA. Epidemiology, Causes, and Management of Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2023 Oct 21;15(10):e47420. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47420. eCollection 2023 Oct.
PMID: 38022211BACKGROUNDNirwan JS, Hasan SS, Babar ZU, Conway BR, Ghori MU. Global Prevalence and Risk Factors of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD): Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 2;10(1):5814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62795-1.
PMID: 32242117BACKGROUNDLee KN, Lee OY, Chun HJ, Kim JI, Kim SK, Lee SW, Park KS, Lee KL, Choi SC, Jang JY, Kim GH, Sung IK, Park MI, Kwon JG, Kim N, Kim JJ, Lee ST, Kim HS, Kim KB, Lee YC, Choi MG, Lee JS, Jung HY, Lee KJ, Kim JH, Chung H. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared with esomeprazole in erosive esophagitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 28;28(44):6294-6309. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i44.6294.
PMID: 36504556BACKGROUNDMaret-Ouda J, Markar SR, Lagergren J. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Review. JAMA. 2020 Dec 22;324(24):2536-2547. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.21360.
PMID: 33351048BACKGROUNDEusebi LH, Ratnakumaran R, Yuan Y, Solaymani-Dodaran M, Bazzoli F, Ford AC. Global prevalence of, and risk factors for, gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2018 Mar;67(3):430-440. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313589. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
PMID: 28232473BACKGROUNDHojo M, Nagahara A, Hahm KB, Iwakiri R, Watanabe T, Rani AA, Zhu Q, Chan FKL, Sollano JD, Kamiya T, Yamaguchi S, Motoya S, Fock KM, Fukudo S, Kachintorn U, Suzuki H, Murakami K; The International Gastroenterology Consensus Symposium Study Group. Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Asian Countries: Results of a Questionnaire Survey. Digestion. 2020;101(1):66-79. doi: 10.1159/000504749. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
PMID: 31801133BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Open-label design may introduce reporting bias for subjective symptoms. As an investigator-initiated trial, the scope was narrower than large registration trials. Use of Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) for missing efficacy data might not accurately reflect outcomes post-dropout. Finally, results from the specific geographic setting (Indonesia) may have limited generalizability to broader global populations.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Prof Dr. dr. Ari Fahrial Syam, SpPD, K-GEH, MMB, FACP, FACG, FINASIM
- Organization
- RS Islam Jakarta Cempaka Putih
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ari Fahrial Syam, MD, PhD
RS Islam Jakarta Cempaka Putih
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Gastroenterologist, Department of Internal Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2025
First Posted
January 8, 2026
Study Start
August 28, 2024
Primary Completion
November 12, 2024
Study Completion
December 13, 2024
Last Updated
August 24, 2026
Results First Posted
August 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study protocol and informed consent did not include provisions for data sharing beyond the study investigators. In addition, the data contain sensitive participant information, and sharing IPD is restricted to protect participant confidentiality and comply with local regulations and institutional policies.