School-Based Sensory Processing and Daily Living Skills-Focused Occupational Therapy Program
Development and Evaluation of a School-Based Occupational Therapy Program Focused on Sensory Processing and Activities of Daily Living: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to develop and evaluate a school-based occupational therapy program focused on sensory processing and activities of daily living for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability. Sensory processing difficulties often affect school participation, behavior regulation, and independence in daily tasks. Although occupational therapy interventions have shown benefits in clinical settings, evidence for their use in schools is limited. The trial will take place at Vali Ayhan Çevik Special Education School and will enroll students aged 6 to 14 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will receive weekly 50-minute occupational therapy sessions for 10 to 12 weeks, including sensory preparation, task-oriented practice, and strategies to support everyday skills. The control group will receive family education, a written home program, and routine school observation. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, after the intervention, and at 4 to 6-week follow-up. The main outcome is change in Goal Attainment Scaling scores, which reflect progress toward individualized goals. Additional measures include functional ability, sensory processing, and demographic and clinical information. The study will also monitor feasibility and how closely the program is delivered as planned. This research is expected to provide evidence on the feasibility and effects of a standardized occupational therapy program in a school setting and to support the use of similar approaches in educational contexts.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 4, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2027
April 9, 2026
April 1, 2026
10 months
December 24, 2025
April 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Goal Attainment Scaling
It is a method developed to measure progress toward individualized goals and provides a sensitive way to monitor clinical change, particularly in populations with heterogeneous profiles and in contexts relying on subjective outcome measures. Originally developed by Kiresuk and Sherman, Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) evaluates goal achievement using a five-point scale ranging from -2 (much less than the expected outcome) to +2 (much more than the expected outcome), with 0 representing the expected level of performance. The scale is based on measurable and behaviorally defined goals collaboratively established by the individual, family, and therapist. Each goal can be weighted according to its importance and level of difficulty (weight = importance × difficulty).Recent studies have highlighted GAS as a sensitive, clinically meaningful, and participant-centered outcome measure in pediatric rehabilitation and occupational therapy practice.
Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 10-12 weeks (T1), and follow-up at 4-6 weeks after the intervention (T2)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Sensory Profile
Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 10-12 weeks (T1), and follow-up at 4-6 weeks after the intervention (T2)
Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)
Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 10-12 weeks (T1), and follow-up at 4-6 weeks after the intervention (T2)
Other Outcomes (1)
Pediatric Information Form
Baseline (T0)
Study Arms (2)
School-Based OT (Sensory + ADL)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive a structured, school-based individual occupational therapy program targeting sensory processing and activities of daily living.
Family Education and Home Program
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive family education and a written home program without individualized occupational therapy intervention.
Interventions
IThis intervention component involves structured sensory preparation activities implemented at the beginning of each individual occupational therapy session. Sensory preparation is designed to support arousal regulation, attention, and readiness for task engagement by providing individualized proprioceptive, vestibular, and tactile input. Sensory strategies are selected based on each child's sensory processing characteristics and observed regulation needs and may include activities such as deep pressure input, controlled movement experiences, and tactile modulation tasks. The intensity, duration, and combination of sensory inputs are adjusted within a standardized framework to optimize engagement in subsequent task-oriented activities.
This intervention component focuses on task-oriented training targeting individualized activities of daily living relevant to the child's school and daily life contexts. Activities are selected collaboratively based on assessment findings and may include self-care and school-related daily living tasks such as hand washing, eating, dressing, organizing personal belongings, and waiting in line. Training emphasizes active participation, graded task demands, and repeated practice within meaningful contexts. Tasks are adapted to the child's current performance level to promote skill acquisition, independence, and functional efficiency. Performance is supported through appropriate cueing, environmental modification, and adaptive strategies as needed. Progress toward individualized goals is monitored throughout the intervention period and informs ongoing task selection and grading.
This intervention component focuses on supporting the generalization and sustainability of gains achieved during individual occupatinal therapy sessions by embedding sensory and task-related strategies into natural school and home contexts. Structured generalization activities are implemented to facilitate the transfer of individualized activities of daily living skills from therapy sessions to classroom routines and daily life environments. As part of this component, brief classroom-based sensory support strategies ("sensory micro-protocols") are introduced through teacher guidance. These strategies are designed to promote sensory regulation and participation during typical classroom activities (e.g., transitions, seated tasks, waiting periods) without disrupting routine educational flow. Teachers are provided with clear, feasible guidance on when and how to apply these strategies in response to children's sensory regulation needs.
This intervention consists of structured family education and a written home program focused on supporting children's activities of daily living within the home environment. Families receive guidance on daily living routines, environmental organization, and basic strategies to support independence and participation in everyday tasks. Educational content is provided in a standardized written format to ensure consistency across participants. No individualized occupational therapy sessions or direct therapeutic intervention are delivered to participants in this group during the study period. Children continue their routine school activities and standard school monitoring.
This intervention consists of individually delivered, school-based occupational therapy sessions conducted once weekly in 50-minute sessions over a period of 10-12 weeks. Sessions are implemented in a designated therapy space within the school environment and are guided by a predefined intervention protocol to ensure standardization while allowing individualization based on each child's needs. Each session is planned and delivered by a trained occupational therapist and targets functional participation within daily school routines. Intervention content is individualized according to the child's sensory processing profile, functional performance, and prioritized activities of daily living goals. Session fidelity is monitored using structured checklists to ensure adherence to the protocol across the intervention period.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Regular school attendance (Anticipated ability to attend at least 70% of the planned intervention sessions during the study period);
- Written informed consent obtained from the family;
- Formal diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder or Intellectual Disability, documented by an official disability report;
- Presence of observable difficulties in sensory processing and activities of daily living (ADL), verified through the student's Individualized Education Program (IEP) records;
- Ability to partially follow single-step basic instructions, as documented in the IEP records;
- Willingness of families and teachers to participate in follow-up assessments (T2 and beyond).
You may not qualify if:
- Uncontrolled epilepsy or other medical conditions that may interfere with participation or safety during sessions.
- Medical contraindications to modalities such as swinging or deep pressure or severe musculoskeletal limitations preventing participation in task-oriented ADL practice.
- Being in a period of severe acute behavioral crisis;
- Concurrent participation in occupational therapy or special education programs for ≥2 hours per week that would compromise data interpretation;
- Presence of severe visual or hearing impairments that would substantially limit the child's ability to perceive sensory stimuli, follow task instructions, or validly engage in assessment procedures;
- Inability to maintain family and/or teacher collaboration throughout the intervention period;
- Inconsistent school attendance during the intervention period (e.g., prolonged absenteeism);
- Insufficient language comprehension to engage with basic task instructions even with support.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (10)
Schaaf RC, Burke JP, Cohn E, May-Benson TA, Schoen SA, Roley SS, Lane SJ, Parham LD, Mailloux Z. State of measurement in occupational therapy using sensory integration. Am J Occup Ther. 2014 Sep-Oct;68(5):e149-53. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2014.012526.
PMID: 25184475BACKGROUNDHaley SM. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI): Development, standardization and administration manual. (No Title). 1992.
BACKGROUNDMailloux Z, May-Benson TA, Summers CA, Miller LJ, Brett-Green B, Burke JP, Cohn ES, Koomar JA, Parham LD, Roley SS, Schaaf RC, Schoen SA. Goal attainment scaling as a measure of meaningful outcomes for children with sensory integration disorders. Am J Occup Ther. 2007 Mar-Apr;61(2):254-9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.61.2.254.
PMID: 17436848BACKGROUNDKiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J. 1968 Dec;4(6):443-53. doi: 10.1007/BF01530764.
PMID: 24185570BACKGROUNDLaverdure P, Beisbier S. Occupation- and Activity-Based Interventions to Improve Performance of Activities of Daily Living, Play, and Leisure for Children and Youth Ages 5 to 21: A Systematic Review. Am J Occup Ther. 2021 Jan-Feb;75(1):7501205050p1-7501205050p24. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2021.039560.
PMID: 33399053BACKGROUNDGrandisson M, Rajotte E, Godin J, Chretien-Vincent M, Milot E, Desmarais C. Autism spectrum disorder: How can occupational therapists support schools? Can J Occup Ther. 2020 Feb;87(1):30-41. doi: 10.1177/0008417419838904. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
PMID: 31401850BACKGROUNDOuellet B, Carreau E, Dion V, Rouat A, Tremblay E, Voisin JIA. Efficacy of Sensory Interventions on School Participation of Children With Sensory Disorders: A Systematic Review. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2018 Jul 11;15(1):75-83. doi: 10.1177/1559827618784274. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
PMID: 33447172BACKGROUNDLynch H, Moore A, O'Connor D, Boyle B. Evidence for Implementing Tiered Approaches in School-Based Occupational Therapy in Elementary Schools: A Scoping Review. Am J Occup Ther. 2023 Jan 1;77(1):7701205110. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050027.
PMID: 36706276BACKGROUNDCahill S, Bazyk S. School-based occupational therapy. Case-Smith's occupational therapy for children and adolescents. 2020:627-58.
BACKGROUNDJeong EH. Effects of school-based occupational therapy program for children with disabilities in elementary school in Korea: a case study. BMC Psychol. 2024 Jan 16;12(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01520-3.
PMID: 38229207BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ceyhun Türkmen, associate professor
Çankırı Karatekin University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Res. Asst.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 24, 2025
First Posted
January 8, 2026
Study Start
May 4, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared due to ethical restrictions, data protection regulations, and the involvement of a pediatric population in a school-based setting.