NCT07326267

Brief Summary

This study aims to develop and evaluate a school-based occupational therapy program focused on sensory processing and activities of daily living for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability. Sensory processing difficulties often affect school participation, behavior regulation, and independence in daily tasks. Although occupational therapy interventions have shown benefits in clinical settings, evidence for their use in schools is limited. The trial will take place at Vali Ayhan Çevik Special Education School and will enroll students aged 6 to 14 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will receive weekly 50-minute occupational therapy sessions for 10 to 12 weeks, including sensory preparation, task-oriented practice, and strategies to support everyday skills. The control group will receive family education, a written home program, and routine school observation. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, after the intervention, and at 4 to 6-week follow-up. The main outcome is change in Goal Attainment Scaling scores, which reflect progress toward individualized goals. Additional measures include functional ability, sensory processing, and demographic and clinical information. The study will also monitor feasibility and how closely the program is delivered as planned. This research is expected to provide evidence on the feasibility and effects of a standardized occupational therapy program in a school setting and to support the use of similar approaches in educational contexts.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
9mo left

Started May 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress14%
May 2026Mar 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 24, 2025

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 8, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 4, 2026

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 9, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

December 24, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 8, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

School-Based Occupational TherapySensory Processing InterventionActivities of Daily Living (ADL)Intellectual Disability (ID)Randomized Controlled TrialFeasibility TrialGoal Attainment Scaling (GAS)Special Education SchoolIndependenceSensory Integration

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Goal Attainment Scaling

    It is a method developed to measure progress toward individualized goals and provides a sensitive way to monitor clinical change, particularly in populations with heterogeneous profiles and in contexts relying on subjective outcome measures. Originally developed by Kiresuk and Sherman, Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) evaluates goal achievement using a five-point scale ranging from -2 (much less than the expected outcome) to +2 (much more than the expected outcome), with 0 representing the expected level of performance. The scale is based on measurable and behaviorally defined goals collaboratively established by the individual, family, and therapist. Each goal can be weighted according to its importance and level of difficulty (weight = importance × difficulty).Recent studies have highlighted GAS as a sensitive, clinically meaningful, and participant-centered outcome measure in pediatric rehabilitation and occupational therapy practice.

    Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 10-12 weeks (T1), and follow-up at 4-6 weeks after the intervention (T2)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Sensory Profile

    Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 10-12 weeks (T1), and follow-up at 4-6 weeks after the intervention (T2)

  • Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)

    Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 10-12 weeks (T1), and follow-up at 4-6 weeks after the intervention (T2)

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Pediatric Information Form

    Baseline (T0)

Study Arms (2)

School-Based OT (Sensory + ADL)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive a structured, school-based individual occupational therapy program targeting sensory processing and activities of daily living.

Behavioral: Individual School-Based Occupational Therapy SessionsBehavioral: Sensory Preparation Using Proprioceptive, Vestibular, and Tactile InputBehavioral: Task-Oriented Activities of Daily Living TrainingBehavioral: Generalization and Classroom-Based Sensory Support StrategiesBehavioral: Family Education and Written Home Program

Family Education and Home Program

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants receive family education and a written home program without individualized occupational therapy intervention.

Behavioral: Family Education and Written Home Program

Interventions

IThis intervention component involves structured sensory preparation activities implemented at the beginning of each individual occupational therapy session. Sensory preparation is designed to support arousal regulation, attention, and readiness for task engagement by providing individualized proprioceptive, vestibular, and tactile input. Sensory strategies are selected based on each child's sensory processing characteristics and observed regulation needs and may include activities such as deep pressure input, controlled movement experiences, and tactile modulation tasks. The intensity, duration, and combination of sensory inputs are adjusted within a standardized framework to optimize engagement in subsequent task-oriented activities.

Also known as: Intervention 2
School-Based OT (Sensory + ADL)

This intervention component focuses on task-oriented training targeting individualized activities of daily living relevant to the child's school and daily life contexts. Activities are selected collaboratively based on assessment findings and may include self-care and school-related daily living tasks such as hand washing, eating, dressing, organizing personal belongings, and waiting in line. Training emphasizes active participation, graded task demands, and repeated practice within meaningful contexts. Tasks are adapted to the child's current performance level to promote skill acquisition, independence, and functional efficiency. Performance is supported through appropriate cueing, environmental modification, and adaptive strategies as needed. Progress toward individualized goals is monitored throughout the intervention period and informs ongoing task selection and grading.

Also known as: Intervention 3
School-Based OT (Sensory + ADL)

This intervention component focuses on supporting the generalization and sustainability of gains achieved during individual occupatinal therapy sessions by embedding sensory and task-related strategies into natural school and home contexts. Structured generalization activities are implemented to facilitate the transfer of individualized activities of daily living skills from therapy sessions to classroom routines and daily life environments. As part of this component, brief classroom-based sensory support strategies ("sensory micro-protocols") are introduced through teacher guidance. These strategies are designed to promote sensory regulation and participation during typical classroom activities (e.g., transitions, seated tasks, waiting periods) without disrupting routine educational flow. Teachers are provided with clear, feasible guidance on when and how to apply these strategies in response to children's sensory regulation needs.

Also known as: Intervention 4
School-Based OT (Sensory + ADL)

This intervention consists of structured family education and a written home program focused on supporting children's activities of daily living within the home environment. Families receive guidance on daily living routines, environmental organization, and basic strategies to support independence and participation in everyday tasks. Educational content is provided in a standardized written format to ensure consistency across participants. No individualized occupational therapy sessions or direct therapeutic intervention are delivered to participants in this group during the study period. Children continue their routine school activities and standard school monitoring.

Also known as: Intervention 5
Family Education and Home ProgramSchool-Based OT (Sensory + ADL)

This intervention consists of individually delivered, school-based occupational therapy sessions conducted once weekly in 50-minute sessions over a period of 10-12 weeks. Sessions are implemented in a designated therapy space within the school environment and are guided by a predefined intervention protocol to ensure standardization while allowing individualization based on each child's needs. Each session is planned and delivered by a trained occupational therapist and targets functional participation within daily school routines. Intervention content is individualized according to the child's sensory processing profile, functional performance, and prioritized activities of daily living goals. Session fidelity is monitored using structured checklists to ensure adherence to the protocol across the intervention period.

Also known as: Intervention 1
School-Based OT (Sensory + ADL)

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 14 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Regular school attendance (Anticipated ability to attend at least 70% of the planned intervention sessions during the study period);
  • Written informed consent obtained from the family;
  • Formal diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder or Intellectual Disability, documented by an official disability report;
  • Presence of observable difficulties in sensory processing and activities of daily living (ADL), verified through the student's Individualized Education Program (IEP) records;
  • Ability to partially follow single-step basic instructions, as documented in the IEP records;
  • Willingness of families and teachers to participate in follow-up assessments (T2 and beyond).

You may not qualify if:

  • Uncontrolled epilepsy or other medical conditions that may interfere with participation or safety during sessions.
  • Medical contraindications to modalities such as swinging or deep pressure or severe musculoskeletal limitations preventing participation in task-oriented ADL practice.
  • Being in a period of severe acute behavioral crisis;
  • Concurrent participation in occupational therapy or special education programs for ≥2 hours per week that would compromise data interpretation;
  • Presence of severe visual or hearing impairments that would substantially limit the child's ability to perceive sensory stimuli, follow task instructions, or validly engage in assessment procedures;
  • Inability to maintain family and/or teacher collaboration throughout the intervention period;
  • Inconsistent school attendance during the intervention period (e.g., prolonged absenteeism);
  • Insufficient language comprehension to engage with basic task instructions even with support.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (10)

  • Schaaf RC, Burke JP, Cohn E, May-Benson TA, Schoen SA, Roley SS, Lane SJ, Parham LD, Mailloux Z. State of measurement in occupational therapy using sensory integration. Am J Occup Ther. 2014 Sep-Oct;68(5):e149-53. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2014.012526.

    PMID: 25184475BACKGROUND
  • Haley SM. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI): Development, standardization and administration manual. (No Title). 1992.

    BACKGROUND
  • Mailloux Z, May-Benson TA, Summers CA, Miller LJ, Brett-Green B, Burke JP, Cohn ES, Koomar JA, Parham LD, Roley SS, Schaaf RC, Schoen SA. Goal attainment scaling as a measure of meaningful outcomes for children with sensory integration disorders. Am J Occup Ther. 2007 Mar-Apr;61(2):254-9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.61.2.254.

    PMID: 17436848BACKGROUND
  • Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J. 1968 Dec;4(6):443-53. doi: 10.1007/BF01530764.

    PMID: 24185570BACKGROUND
  • Laverdure P, Beisbier S. Occupation- and Activity-Based Interventions to Improve Performance of Activities of Daily Living, Play, and Leisure for Children and Youth Ages 5 to 21: A Systematic Review. Am J Occup Ther. 2021 Jan-Feb;75(1):7501205050p1-7501205050p24. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2021.039560.

    PMID: 33399053BACKGROUND
  • Grandisson M, Rajotte E, Godin J, Chretien-Vincent M, Milot E, Desmarais C. Autism spectrum disorder: How can occupational therapists support schools? Can J Occup Ther. 2020 Feb;87(1):30-41. doi: 10.1177/0008417419838904. Epub 2019 Aug 11.

    PMID: 31401850BACKGROUND
  • Ouellet B, Carreau E, Dion V, Rouat A, Tremblay E, Voisin JIA. Efficacy of Sensory Interventions on School Participation of Children With Sensory Disorders: A Systematic Review. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2018 Jul 11;15(1):75-83. doi: 10.1177/1559827618784274. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.

    PMID: 33447172BACKGROUND
  • Lynch H, Moore A, O'Connor D, Boyle B. Evidence for Implementing Tiered Approaches in School-Based Occupational Therapy in Elementary Schools: A Scoping Review. Am J Occup Ther. 2023 Jan 1;77(1):7701205110. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050027.

    PMID: 36706276BACKGROUND
  • Cahill S, Bazyk S. School-based occupational therapy. Case-Smith's occupational therapy for children and adolescents. 2020:627-58.

    BACKGROUND
  • Jeong EH. Effects of school-based occupational therapy program for children with disabilities in elementary school in Korea: a case study. BMC Psychol. 2024 Jan 16;12(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01520-3.

    PMID: 38229207BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intellectual DisabilityAutism Spectrum Disorder

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental DisordersChild Development Disorders, Pervasive

Study Officials

  • Ceyhun Türkmen, associate professor

    Çankırı Karatekin University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Feyza Şengül, Res. Asst.

CONTACT

Ceyhun Türkmen, associate professor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: After baseline assessment (T0), participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio using concealed variable block randomization to either the intervention group or the active control group. The intervention group will receive a school-based occupational therapy program consisting of once-weekly 50-minute sessions over 10-12 weeks, including sensory preparation, task-oriented activities of daily living practice, and generalization. The active control group will receive family education, a written home program, and routine school monitoring.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Res. Asst.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2025

First Posted

January 8, 2026

Study Start

May 4, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared due to ethical restrictions, data protection regulations, and the involvement of a pediatric population in a school-based setting.