NCT07325188

Brief Summary

This study aims to assess the accuracy of toric intraocular lens (IOL) alignment axes as calculated and displayed by a novel digital guidance system. In addition, it evaluates the time required to initiate surgical guidance and postoperative refractive astigmatism following toric IOL implantation. This single-surgeon, single-site, prospective, non-invasive observational study evaluated the accuracy of toric IOL alignment axes calculated and displayed by the digital guidance system (Cassini Technologies, B.V.) in 100 eyes. The intraoperatively calculated alignment axes were compared to preoperative measurements to assess their accuracy (in degrees). Postoperative outcomes, including residual refractive astigmatism (diopters) and visual acuity (Snellen), were recorded at 1 month postoperatively.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Nov 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress51%
Nov 2025Oct 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 4, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 4, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 8, 2026

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2026

Last Updated

January 8, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

December 4, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 6, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

GuidanceToric IOL

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy (measured in degrees of arc) using the Cassini Guidance system for calculated alignment axis for toric IOL implantation.

    Primary Endpoint: 1\. Accuracy of the calculated alignment axis (degrees of arc = angular degrees) * Definition: The angular difference between the alignment axis for toric IOLs as determined with the CGS and the intended alignment axis as determined with the Cassini Ambient. * Thresholds of interest: ≤3°, ≤5°, ≤10°, \>10°. * Justification: Misalignment greater than 10° results in a clinically significant loss of toric correction (approximately 33%) (Quesada et al., 2022; Hu, 2023), making this a meaningful accuracy benchmark.

    Total completion up to 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Time efficiency (measured in seconds) of the Cassini Guidance System in eyes undergoing cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation.

    Total completion up to 12 months

Study Arms (1)

Surgical guidance for Toric IOL alignment intraoperatively

OTHER

Interventional

Device: Cassini Guidance

Interventions

Cassini Guidance with HUD

Surgical guidance for Toric IOL alignment intraoperatively

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation,
  • Eyes implanted with a toric IOL.

You may not qualify if:

  • Ocular comorbidity likely to impair postoperative visual acuities, or
  • History of ocular trauma or zonular instability, or
  • Previous refractive surgery, or
  • Irregular corneal astigmatism or keratoconus, or
  • Patients with physical or intellectual disabilities that may prevent reliable fixation or comprehension (e.g. Down's Syndrome, Parkinson's Disease), or
  • Patients with unreliable biometry measurements, or
  • Severe dry eye disease or ocular surface disease.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

North Georgia Eye Associates

Gainesville, Georgia, 30501, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Yao L, Jia S, Yang X, Li M, Yu X, Zhao P, Bai H. Image-Guided Marking versus Manual Marking in Phacoemulsification with Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Semin Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan;39(1):60-65. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2231575. Epub 2023 Jul 3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lens DiseasesEye Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Dr. Clayton Blehm Blehm, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2025

First Posted

January 8, 2026

Study Start

November 4, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Last Updated

January 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations