Effectiveness of a Home-based Cervical Motor Control Exercise Programme Versus Conventional Manual Therapy in Patients With Post-whiplash Neck Pain.
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Whiplash-associated disorders are a common cause of persistent neck pain following traffic accidents and are frequently associated with impairments in cervical motor control, pain, and functional disability. Therapeutic exercise aimed at restoring cervical motor control has shown promising results; however, evidence regarding the effectiveness of structured home-based exercise programs compared with conventional physiotherapy remains limited. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a home-based cervical motor control exercise program versus conventional physiotherapy in patients with whiplash-associated neck pain. A randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups was conducted. Patients diagnosed with whiplash-associated neck pain were randomly assigned to either an experimental group performing a structured home-based cervical motor control exercise program or a control group receiving conventional physiotherapy based on manual therapy and cervical mobilization techniques. Outcome measures included pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale, functional disability measured with the Neck Disability Index, and active cervical range of motion. Assessments were performed at baseline and after an eight-week intervention period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 23, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2026
CompletedJanuary 8, 2026
December 1, 2025
3 months
December 23, 2025
December 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pain
measured using the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) (where 0 is the least possible pain and 10 is the maximum possible pain)
2 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
range of motion
2 months
Study Arms (2)
home-based cervical motor control exercise programme
EXPERIMENTALhome-based cervical motor control exercise programme monitored by physiotherapists
conventional physiotherapy treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional physiotherapy treatment including passive therapies (manual therapy) in the physiotherapy clinic.
Interventions
home-based programme of active cervical motor control exercises supervised by physiotherapists
Conventional physiotherapy treatment with passive therapy (manual therapy) carried out in a physiotherapy clinic.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who met the following criteria were included:
- Age between 18 and 65 years.
- Clinical diagnosis of post-whiplash neck pain resulting from a traffic accident.
- Symptoms lasting longer than four weeks.
- Presence of neck pain with a minimum intensity of 3 points on the Visual Analogue Scale.
- Ability to understand and follow the instructions of the home exercise programme.
- Signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with the following conditions were excluded:
- Signs of severe neurological compromise or significant structural cervical pathology (fractures, cervical instability, myelopathy).
- History of cervical surgery.
- Rheumatic, neurological, or systemic diseases that could influence the results.
- Previous physiotherapy treatment for the same episode in the three months prior to the study.
- Pregnancy or any medical contraindication for therapeutic exercise.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca
Salamanca, 37002, Spain
Related Publications (4)
Randlov A, Ostergaard M, Manniche C, Kryger P, Jordan A, Heegaard S, Holm B. Intensive dynamic training for females with chronic neck/shoulder pain. A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 1998 Jun;12(3):200-10. doi: 10.1191/026921598666881319.
PMID: 9688035RESULTJordan A, Bendix T, Nielsen H, Hansen FR, Host D, Winkel A. Intensive training, physiotherapy, or manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain. A prospective, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Feb 1;23(3):311-8; discussion 319. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199802010-00005.
PMID: 9507618RESULTBronfort G, Evans R, Nelson B, Aker PD, Goldsmith CH, Vernon H. A randomized clinical trial of exercise and spinal manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Apr 1;26(7):788-97; discussion 798-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200104010-00020.
PMID: 11295901RESULTKjellman GV, Skargren EI, Oberg BE. A critical analysis of randomised clinical trials on neck pain and treatment efficacy. A review of the literature. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1999 Sep;31(3):139-52. doi: 10.1080/003655099444489.
PMID: 10458312RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Double blinding
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 23, 2025
First Posted
January 8, 2026
Study Start
January 10, 2025
Primary Completion
April 10, 2025
Study Completion
September 10, 2025
Last Updated
January 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12