Effect of Recruitment Maneuver on Postoperative Atelectasis Assessed by Lung Ultrasound in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
LUNG USG SCORE
EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF RECRUITMENT MANEUVER ON POSTOPERATIVE ATELECTASIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY SURGERY USING LUS (LUG ULTRASOUND SCALE)
2 other identifiers
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This single-centre, prospective, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial evaluated whether alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (RMs) added to a lung-protective ventilation strategy improve perioperative lung aeration in adults undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia. Eighty patients (ASA I-III) were allocated 1:1 to an RM group or a control group. Both groups received identical low-tidal-volume ventilation with 5 cmH₂O PEEP; the RM group additionally received a standardized stepwise recruitment manoeuvre at two points-after establishment of pneumoperitoneum and again before extubation-with PEEP returned to 5 cmH₂O after each manoeuvre. Lung aeration was assessed by an 8-zone lung ultrasound (LUS) protocol at five predefined perioperative time points. The primary outcome was the perioperative composite LUS score trajectory. Peripheral oxygen saturation, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate were assessed as safety outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2026
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 19, 2026
CompletedAugust 5, 2026
July 1, 2026
6 months
December 24, 2025
January 31, 2026
July 13, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS)
Lung ultrasound score (LUS) assessed using a 8-zone scanning technique. Each zone is scored from 0 (normal aeration, A-lines) to 3 (lung consolidation). Total score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating worse lung aeration. Change calculated as difference from baseline (T0) to T1 and T2.
Baseline (T0), 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum (T1), and 30 minutes after desufflation (T2)
Study Arms (2)
Recruitment manoeuvre (RM) group
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive low-tidal-volume ventilation (6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight) with 5 cmH₂O PEEP, plus a standardized stepwise alveolar recruitment manoeuvre applied at two time points: after establishment of CO₂ pneumoperitoneum and again before extubation. Each manoeuvre uses a fixed driving pressure of 15 cmH₂O with PEEP incremented stepwise (5 → 10 → 15 cmH₂O, 10-15 seconds per step); PEEP is returned to 5 cmH₂O after each manoeuvre. Lung aeration is assessed by 8-zone lung ultrasound at five predefined perioperative time points.
Control group (no recruitment manoeuvre)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive low-tidal-volume ventilation (6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight) with 5 cmH₂O PEEP maintained throughout the intraoperative period, without any alveolar recruitment manoeuvre. All other anaesthetic and surgical management is identical to the RM group. Lung aeration is assessed by 8-zone lung ultrasound at the same five predefined perioperative time points.
Interventions
A standardized stepwise alveolar recruitment manoeuvre applied at two intraoperative time points: after establishment of CO₂ pneumoperitoneum and again before extubation. Each manoeuvre uses a fixed driving pressure of 15 cmH₂O with PEEP incremented stepwise (5 → 10 → 15 cmH₂O, 10-15 seconds per step), then PEEP returned to 5 cmH₂O. The manoeuvre is terminated if peak inspiratory pressure exceeds 35 cmH₂O or haemodynamic instability occurs. Applied in addition to low-tidal-volume protective ventilation.
Volume-controlled low-tidal-volume ventilation (6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight) with 5 cmH₂O PEEP and FiO₂ titrated to maintain SpO₂ ≥ 95%, applied to both groups. Perioperative lung aeration is assessed using a standardized 8-zone lung ultrasound protocol at five predefined time points (preoperative baseline, 5 minutes post-induction, post-pneumoperitoneum, immediately post-extubation, and 30 minutes after PACU arrival) by blinded assessors independent of ventilation management.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia
- Age between 18 and 75 years
- Body mass index (BMI) \< 30 kg/m²
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-III
- Provision of written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate in the study
- Emergency surgical procedures
- Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m²
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification IV
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Provincial Health Directorate Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Istanbul, 34000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Liu Y, Wang J, Geng Y, Zhang Y, Su H, Yang Y. The effect of ultrasound-guided lung recruitment maneuvers on atelectasis in lung-healthy patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jul 1;22(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01742-1.
PMID: 35778701RESULTKim BR, Lee S, Bae H, Lee M, Bahk JH, Yoon S. Lung ultrasound score to determine the effect of fraction inspired oxygen during alveolar recruitment on absorption atelectasis in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jul 18;20(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01090-y.
PMID: 32682397RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Single-center design limits generalizability. Study was unblinded due to the nature of ventilation protocols. Lung ultrasound scoring may have inter-observer variability despite standardized training. Long-term outcomes beyond hospital discharge were not assessed.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Name: Cansu Oflıuoglu, MD Official Title: Principal Investigator, Department of Anesthesiology
- Organization
- Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
doga meric yukselen, MD
ISTANBUL PROVINCIAL HEALTH DIRECTORATE FATIH SULTAN MEHMET TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL
- STUDY CHAIR
elif acar deger, MD
ISTANBUL PROVINCIAL HEALTH DIRECTORATE FATIH SULTAN MEHMET TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL
- STUDY CHAIR
oznur demiroluk, MD
ISTANBUL PROVINCIAL HEALTH DIRECTORATE FATIH SULTAN MEHMET TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL
- STUDY CHAIR
arzu yildirim ar, MD
ISTANBUL PROVINCIAL HEALTH DIRECTORATE FATIH SULTAN MEHMET TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL
- STUDY DIRECTOR
arsen gungor ay, MD
ISTANBUL PROVINCIAL HEALTH DIRECTORATE FATIH SULTAN MEHMET TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
cansu ofluoglu, MD
ISTANBUL PROVINCIAL HEALTH DIRECTORATE FATIH SULTAN MEHMET TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 24, 2025
First Posted
January 7, 2026
Study Start
April 25, 2025
Primary Completion
October 25, 2025
Study Completion
October 26, 2025
Last Updated
August 5, 2026
Results First Posted
February 19, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared.