Supportive Care-Based Training and Psychological Outcomes in Midwifery Students
The Effect of Training Programs Based on Different Supportive Care Models in Childbirth on Midwifery Students' Clinical Self-Efficacy and Psychological Outcomes
1 other identifier
interventional
92
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to comparatively evaluate the effects of trauma-informed supportive care model training in childbirth and universal supportive care model training in childbirth provided to midwifery students on their clinical skill self-efficacy in the delivery room, state anxiety, and secondary traumatic stress levels.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 8, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 8, 2026
January 7, 2026
September 1, 2025
10 months
December 22, 2025
December 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Skills Self-Efficacy
Midwifery students' clinical skills self-efficacy was assessed using the Clinical Skills Self-Efficacy Scale (CSSES). The scale was developed by Kang et al. (2019) to evaluate individuals' self-efficacy related to clinical practice. It consists of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor subdimensions. The Turkish version includes 11 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree, with higher scores indicating higher clinical self-efficacy. The Turkish adaptation demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .91).
before the training and immediately after completion of delivery room clinical practice
State and Trait Anxiety
Midwifery students' anxiety levels were assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), developed by Spielberger et al. (1970). The inventory consists of two subscales-State Anxiety and Trait Anxiety-each comprising 20 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Some positively worded items are reverse scored. Total scores reflect individuals' current (state) or general (trait) anxiety levels, with higher scores indicating higher anxiety. The Turkish version of the scale demonstrated high reliability, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from .94-.96 for the State Anxiety subscale and .83-.87 for the Trait Anxiety subscale.
Trait Anxiety-before the training and one week after completion of delivery room practice; State Anxiety-immediately after completion of delivery room practice
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary Traumatic Stress
Time Frame: one week after completion of delivery room clinical practice
Study Arms (2)
Universal Continuous Supportive Care Model Training
EXPERIMENTALThe first study group consisted of midwifery students enrolled in the Perinatal Health Practices I course during the fall semester. Following standard hospital orientation, students received Universal Continuous Supportive Care Model Training in childbirth, developed in line with the recommendations of Adams et al. The training lasted four hours, including one hour of theoretical instruction and three hours of practical application. The training focused on the core principles of universal continuous supportive care, their integration into clinical practice, and the use of a supportive care skills checklist. The 20-item checklist was developed by the researchers based on the literature to support students' self-evaluation of supportive care skills and included four domains: physical support, emotional support, education/information, and advocacy. Students were also encouraged to use a structured anamnesis form to plan individualized care.
Trauma-Informed Supportive Care Model Training
EXPERIMENTALThe second study group consisted of midwifery students enrolled in the Perinatal Health Practices II course during the spring semester. Following standard hospital orientation, students received Trauma-Informed Supportive Care Model Training in childbirth, based on the recommendations of the Centre for Early Child Development. The training lasted four hours, including one hour of theoretical instruction and three hours of practical application. The training addressed the core principles of trauma-informed care, trauma-sensitive communication, and individualized care, with emphasis on integration into clinical practice. A 20-item trauma-informed supportive care checklist was introduced to support students' self-evaluation, structured around recognition and compassion, communication and collaboration, consistency and continuity, and understanding diversity. A trauma-informed anamnesis form was also used to guide individualized care planning.
Interventions
The second study group consisted of midwifery students enrolled in the Perinatal Health Practices II course during the spring semester. Following standard hospital orientation, students received Trauma-Informed Supportive Care Model Training in childbirth, based on the recommendations of the Centre for Early Child Development. The training lasted four hours, including one hour of theoretical instruction and three hours of practical application. The training addressed the core principles of trauma-informed care, trauma-sensitive communication, and individualized care, with emphasis on integration into clinical practice. A 20-item trauma-informed supportive care checklist was introduced to support students' self-evaluation, structured around recognition and compassion, communication and collaboration, consistency and continuity, and understanding diversity. A trauma-informed anamnesis form was also used to guide individualized care planning.
The first study group consisted of midwifery students enrolled in the Perinatal Health Practices I course during the fall semester. Following standard hospital orientation, students received Universal Continuous Supportive Care Model Training in childbirth, developed in line with the recommendations of Adams et al. The training lasted four hours, including one hour of theoretical instruction and three hours of practical application. The training focused on the core principles of universal continuous supportive care, their integration into clinical practice, and the use of a supportive care skills checklist. The 20-item checklist was developed by the researchers based on the literature to support students' self-evaluation of supportive care skills and included four domains: physical support, emotional support, education/information, and advocacy. Students were also encouraged to use a structured anamnesis form to plan individualized care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Voluntary participation in the study
- Native Turkish speakers
- Enrollment as a fourth-year student in the Midwifery Department of Mersin University during the 2025-2026 academic year
- Enrollment in Perinatal Health Practices I or Perinatal Health Practices II
- Participation in delivery room clinical practice at Mersin City Training and Research Hospital
- No diagnosed psychiatric disorder and no use of psychiatric medication
You may not qualify if:
- Withdrawal from the study at any stage upon the participant's own request
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gozde Gokce Isbir
Mersin, Mersin, 33180, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2025
First Posted
January 7, 2026
Study Start
September 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 8, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 8, 2026
Last Updated
January 7, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share