Improving Shared Decision-Making in Menstrual Management and Contraception for Adolescents and Young Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
252
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Decision aids are educational tools designed to help people participate in decision-making about health care choices, by providing evidence-based information, promoting patient-centered care, and supporting patient autonomy and engagement. Our research team developed an Encounter Decision Aid (EDA) exploring treatment options for menstrual management in adolescents and young adults (AYAs), in accordance with the latest International Patient Decision Aids Standards and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. In this cluster-randomized controlled trial, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of this EDA on patient-centered outcome measures in AYAs considering treatment for menstrual management and/or contraception compared to standard counseling.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2028
January 6, 2026
December 1, 2025
2.1 years
August 31, 2025
December 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient decisional conflict measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale low literacy (LL-DCS).
Decisional conflict is defined as a state of uncertainty about a course of action and is measured by the Decisional Conflict Scale. It is recognized as a core component of the quality of the decision-making process. The Decisional Conflict Scale low literacy (LL-DCS) is a validated score that includes 10 items which are scored on a 0 to 4 scale; the items scores are summed, divided by 10, and then multiplied by 25. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater decisional conflict.
immediately after the clinical encounter
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Patient decisional conflict at 3 months, using the low literacy Decisional Conflict Scale (LL-DCS).
at 3 months post-clinical encounter
Patient knowledge.
immediately after the clinical encounter
Knowledge retention
knowledge questionnaire at 3 months post-intervention
Patient and healthcare provider satisfaction with the decision-making process
immediately after the clinical encounter
Patient involvement in decision-making
immediately after the clinical encounter (10-point Likert scale).
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORintervention group
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The intervention will involve the use of an encounter decision aid (EDA) during the clinical encounter. This paper-based tool was developed through an iterative process at HUG by our multidisciplinary team, comprising clinicians, specialized nurses, clinical researchers, graphic designer, stakeholders and patient representatives.
The control intervention consists of standard consultation with usual counseling.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adolescents and young adults aged 12-25 years old
- presenting to an outpatient consultation at "Unité de policlinique de gynécologie" or "Consultation de gynécologie pédiatrique" at HUG
- considering initiation or switch to hormonal medication for menstrual management and/or contraception
- able to give informed consent as documented by signature or accompanied by a legal guardian who can provide consent if required.
You may not qualify if:
- individuals who cannot read and understand French to a degree that would prevent participation in informed consent and study-related materials.
- individuals who have major sensory disability, such as visual or hearing impairment, that would compromise their ability to give written informed consent and use the EDA, in the absence of their legal guardian.
- individuals with cognitive or psychiatric conditions significantly impairing decision making capacity, unless accompanied by a legal guardian.
- patients currently participating in another clinical trial related to contraceptive decision-making, to avoid potential interference.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Geneva University Hospitals
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2025
First Posted
January 6, 2026
Study Start
September 2, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Last Updated
January 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12