NCT07317284

Brief Summary

This study aims:

  • To compare conventional diabetic neuropathy screening techniques with user-friendly technological equipment;
  • To evaluate the effects of the combined application of laser and therapeutic ultrasound in the treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) in its early stages, aiming to prevent severe complications, such as the development of diabetic foot. Two groups were formed: Treatment group and placebo group. 24 sessions were performed (twice a week, on alternate days). It is concluded that the combined treatment with laser and therapeutic ultrasound for diabetic peripheral neuropathy promotes a significant reduction in symptoms and improvement in sensitivity in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 10, 2024

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 7, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 20, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 18, 2025

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 5, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 13, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

December 18, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 10, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Diabetes Mellitus 2 TypeDiabetic NeuropathyPhotobiomodulation TherapyUltrasound Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in neuropathic pain intensity

    Changes in the severity of neuropathic symptoms (pain, burning, tingling, and numbness) in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy were evaluated using the following instruments: (1) Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS), a clinical scale that quantifies neuropathic severity through neurological examination. Scores range from 0 to 10 points, with higher values indicating greater neurological impairment and worse clinical outcomes, and lower values reflecting better neurological function. (2) DPN-Check, a validated point-of-care diagnostic device used to assess diabetic peripheral neuropathy by measuring sural nerve conduction velocity (NCV, m/s) and sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude (µV) through a standardized, noninvasive electrophysiological assessment. The device reports NCV values from 20 to 70 m/s and SNAP amplitude values from 0 to 32 µV. Values ≥ 4 µV and ≥ 40 m/s are considered normal, whereas lower values indicate peripheral nerve dysfunction.

    Baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention.

Study Arms (2)

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Early Stages: Photobiomodulation and Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Arm experimental: Participants allocated to the experimental arm will receive a combined photobiomodulation (PBM) and therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) protocol applied bilaterally over the anatomical pathway of the sural nerve. TUS parameters: 1 MHz frequency, pulsed mode (50% duty cycle), secondary frequency of 100 Hz, intensity of 0.8 W/cm², energy density of 144 J/cm². PBM parameters: 808-nm infrared wavelength, continuous mode, 100 mW power, irradiation area of 0.125 cm², resulting in 36 J total energy per session (286 J/cm²).

Device: Active Comparator

Early diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Sham Group

SHAM COMPARATOR

Arm Control (Sham): Participants allocated to the control arm will undergo a sham procedure designed to mimic the experimental intervention without delivering therapeutic energy. The same device will be used with minimal TUS settings: 1 MHz frequency, 50% duty cycle, secondary frequency of 16 Hz, intensity of 0.1 W/cm², energy density of 18 J/cm². The PBM emitter will remain off to ensure no light emission.

Device: Sham Group Arm

Interventions

Participants allocated to the experimental arm will receive a combined photobiomodulation (PBM) and therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) protocol applied bilaterally over the anatomical pathway of the sural nerve, using the Recupero device (MMOptics, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil), which integrates both PBM and TUS modalities for research and clinical applications. Therapeutic ultrasound parameters: 1 MHz frequency, pulsed mode (50% duty cycle), secondary frequency of 100 Hz, intensity of 0.8 W/cm² , energy density of 144 J/cm². Photobiomodulation parameters: 808-nm infrared wavelength, continuous mode, 100 mW power, irradiation area of 0.125 cm², resulting in 36 J total energy per session (286 J/cm²).

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Early Stages: Photobiomodulation and Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatm

Participants allocated to the control arm will undergo a sham procedure designed to mimic the experimental intervention without delivering therapeutic energy. The same device will be used (RECUPERO, MMOptics, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil) with minimal ultrasound therapy settings: 1 MHz frequency, 50% duty cycle, secondary frequency of 16 Hz, intensity of 0.1 W/cm², energy density of 18 J/cm². The photobiomodulation emitter will remain off to ensure no light emission.

Early diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Sham Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Type II diabetes diagnosed between 7 and 15 years old;
  • Age between 45 and 70 years;
  • Sex female and male.

You may not qualify if:

  • Diabetic foot;
  • Lower limb involvement with metal implants, ankle and foot fractures;
  • Serious illnesses such as malignant or benign tumors;
  • Serious psychological problems;
  • Hormonal disorders;
  • Pacemaker users;
  • Hemodialysis treatment;
  • Drug use;
  • Physiotherapy treatment for less than six months.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Research, Innovation and Development Support Center

São Carlos, São Paulo, 13569350, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Wang J, Wu Y, Li J, et al. Synergistic effects of photobiomodulation and mechanical stimulation on nerve regeneration. Lasers in Medical Science. 2022;37(4):1931-1942. PMID: 35184274

    RESULT
  • Paolillo FR, Paolillo AR, Joao JP, Frasca D, Duchene M, Joao HA, Bagnato VS. Ultrasound plus low-level laser therapy for knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatol Int. 2018 May;38(5):785-793. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4000-x. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

  • Cheng K, Martin LF, Slepian MJ, Patwardhan AM, Ibrahim MM. Mechanisms and Pathways of Pain Photobiomodulation: A Narrative Review. J Pain. 2021 Jul;22(7):763-777. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic Neuropathies

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesDiabetes Complications

Study Officials

  • Vanderlei Bagnato, Phd

    University São Paulo

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Cleber Ferraresi, Phd

    University Federal of São Carlos

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The study's methodological design was double-blind: the evaluators responsible for measuring the outcomes had no prior knowledge of the type of intervention the participants underwent; and the participants themselves were also unaware of which treatment (active or sham) they were receiving. It is worth noting that the researchers responsible for administering the intervention were unaware of the results of the participants' initial assessments and did not participate in the final analyses. This methodological structure directly contributed to reducing observational and analytical biases, promoting greater reliability of the findings.
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The clinical trial was randomized, with 60 volunteers (men and women) with diabetes mellitus (type II) following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. To form the experimental groups, three pots (1, 2, 3) were prepared, and the distribution of participants into the groups respected the degree of neuropathic impairment, classified as mild (pot 1), moderate (pot 2), or severe (pot 3) based on the results obtained by assessing nerve conduction velocity measured by the DPN Check® equipment, then used to assess sural nerve function. Sixty envelopes, numbered sequentially from 1 to 60, were also prepared and placed in the jars, using simple randomization. Even numbers were assigned to Group 1, which received synergistic treatment with photobiomodulation and therapeutic ultrasound; and odd numbers were assigned to Group 2, which received sham treatment (control group). Thus, each participant was instructed to choose an envelope from the jar corresponding to their level of impairment, in order
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2025

First Posted

January 5, 2026

Study Start

July 10, 2024

Primary Completion

April 7, 2025

Study Completion

May 20, 2025

Last Updated

January 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations