Pelashield™ PainGuard™ vs Restrata® in HS Surgery
Outcomes With Pelashield™ PainGuard™ Compared to Restrata® in Standard Two-Stage Excision and Closure for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Prospective Cohort With Retrospective Comparator
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) is a long-lasting skin condition that causes painful lumps and infections. In severe cases, patients need surgery to remove the affected skin. After surgery, a wound dressing called a wound matrix is placed over the area to help the skin heal. This study will compare two different wound matrices: Restrata®, which is the current standard treatment. Pelashield™ PainGuard™, a newer dressing that contains silver to reduce bacteria and lidocaine to help with pain. The goal of this research is to find out if Pelashield™ PainGuard™ helps patients heal better after surgery than Restrata®. We will look at: How quickly healthy granulation tissue (new healing tissue) forms How soon the wound is ready for the second surgery to apply a skin graft How often infections happen after surgery How much narcotic (opioid) pain medication patients need after surgery Patients who receive Pelashield™ PainGuard™ will be enrolled in the study going forward (prospective group). Patients who previously had surgery with Restrata® will be included through a review of their medical records (retrospective group). No additional procedures will be done outside of standard surgical care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 24, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
January 5, 2026
December 1, 2025
8 months
December 24, 2025
December 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Postoperative Opioid Analgesic Usage
Total cumulative opioid consumption during two distinct postoperative periods:
Period 1: After Stage 1 excision through day before Stage 2 closure (up to 8 weeks starting one day after surgery 1) Period 2: Stage 2 closure through 30 days post-Stage 2
ReCell Skin Graft Incorporation
Percentage of the Stage 2 wound bed demonstrating successful ReCell graft take, reflecting the quality of granulation tissue and bacterial burden of the wound bed at time of grafting.
Assessment performed at 14 days (±3 days) post-Stage 2 during routine clinic follow-up
Surgical Site Infection (SSI) During Wound Bed Preparation
Presence of a clinically diagnosed surgical site infection occurring between Stage 1 excision and Stage 2 closure as defined by CDC criteria.
After Stage 1 excision through day before Stage 2 closure (up to 8 weeks starting one day after surgery 1)
Time to Definitive Closure (Granulation Readiness)
Number of days from Stage 1 excision to Stage 2 definitive closure (debridement and ReCell application).
After Stage 1 excision through day before Stage 2 closure (up to 8 weeks starting one day after surgery 1)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Non-Opioid Analgesic Use
Period 1: After Stage 1 excision through day before Stage 2 closure (up to 8 weeks starting one day after surgery 1) Period 2: Stage 2 closure through 30 days post-Stage 2
Study Arms (1)
Pelashield™ PainGuard™ Group
EXPERIMENTALProcedures: Perform wide excision of HS-affected tissue Apply Pelashield™ PainGuard™ to cover the surgical wound Place wound dressing and provide standard postoperative care instructions
Interventions
This is the only intervention being used in this study
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (≥18 years) with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of HS requiring wide surgical excision.
- Ability to provide informed consent in English.
- Willingness and ability to attend routine postoperative follow-up visits to monitor healing and readiness for second-stage closure.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-English-speaking patients (due to consent and follow-up communication limitations).
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to wound matrix components (polyvinyl alcohol), local anesthetics, or silver.
- Known sensitivity to lidocaine or history of cardiac conditions contraindicating lidocaine use (e.g., severe heart block, Adams-Stokes syndrome, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome).
- Pregnancy or active breastfeeding.
- Severe immunosuppression (e.g., chemotherapy within 3 months, solid organ transplant, uncontrolled HIV with CD4 \<200, or chronic systemic steroids \>10 mg prednisone-equivalent/day).
- Uncontrolled diabetes (most recent HbA1c \>10% if available within 3 months).
- Active systemic infection or sepsis at time of surgery.
- Inability to complete postoperative follow-up through second-stage closure (e.g., plans to relocate).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital
Newark, New Jersey, 07103, United States
Related Publications (10)
Leaper DJ, Schultz G, Carville K, Fletcher J, Swanson T, Drake R. Extending the TIME concept: what have we learned in the past 10 years?(*). Int Wound J. 2012 Dec;9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01097.x.
PMID: 23145905BACKGROUNDWounds UK. International consensus. Appropriate use of silver dressings in wounds. Wounds UK. 2012;8(1):1-28.
BACKGROUNDMacEwan MR, MacEwan S, Kovacs TR, Batts J. What Makes the Optimal Wound Healing Material? A Review of Current Science and Introduction of a Synthetic Nanofabricated Wound Care Scaffold. Cureus. 2017 Oct 2;9(10):e1736. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1736.
PMID: 29209583BACKGROUNDMatusiak L, Bieniek A, Szepietowski JC. Psychophysical aspects of hidradenitis suppurativa. Acta Derm Venereol. 2010 May;90(3):264-8. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0866.
PMID: 20526543BACKGROUNDRing HC, Sorensen H, Miller IM, List EK, Saunte DM, Jemec GB. Pain in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Pilot Study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2016 May;96(4):554-6. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2308. No abstract available.
PMID: 26631388BACKGROUNDScuderi N, Alfano C, Paolini G, et al. Surgical treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa: evaluation of two methods and postoperative outcome analysis. Int Wound J. 2013;10(4):435-441.
BACKGROUNDKohorst JJ, Baum CL, Otley CC, Roenigk RK, Schenck LA, Pemberton JH, Dozois EJ, Tran NV, Senchenkov A, Davis MD. Surgical Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Outcomes of 590 Consecutive Patients. Dermatol Surg. 2016 Sep;42(9):1030-40. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000806.
PMID: 27340739BACKGROUNDAlavi A, Lynde C, Alhusayen R, Bourcier M, Delorme I, George R, Gooderham M, Gulliver W, Kalia S, Marcoux D, Poulin Y. Approach to the Management of Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Consensus Document. J Cutan Med Surg. 2017 Nov/Dec;21(6):513-524. doi: 10.1177/1203475417716117. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
PMID: 28639459BACKGROUNDMehdizadeh A, Hazen PG, Bechara FG, et al. A comprehensive review of surgical treatment in hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(Suppl 1):S149-S164.
BACKGROUNDJemec GB. Clinical practice. Hidradenitis suppurativa. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):158-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1014163. No abstract available.
PMID: 22236226BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Granick, MD
New Jersey Medical School
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 24, 2025
First Posted
January 5, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The findings from this study are intended to contribute to the scientific literature and will likely be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication or presentation at academic meetings. Participants will continue to receive all clinically relevant information about their own care and outcomes during routine follow-up visits, but they will not receive individual or aggregate research results unless they specifically request them after study completion.