Accuracy of Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Imaging in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Surgery
ICG-GCTB
A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for the Visualization of Residual Lesions in the Tumor Cavity During Surgery for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence imaging in visualizing residual lesions of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone (GCTB) in the tumor cavity during surgery. Patients diagnosed with GCTB will receive an intravenous injection of ICG prior to the operation to label tumor tissues. During the procedure, surgeons will use a near-infrared fluorescence imaging system to visualize the tumor cavity and identify potential residual lesions after standard curettage. The study aims to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ICG fluorescence imaging by comparing the intraoperative fluorescence findings with the final pathological results of the validation samples.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 2, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 2, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
January 5, 2026
January 1, 2026
11 months
December 20, 2025
January 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic Accuracy of ICG Fluorescence Imaging (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV)
The diagnostic performance of ICG fluorescence imaging in detecting GCTB lesions will be evaluated by comparing the intraoperative fluorescence status (Positive/Negative) with the final histopathological diagnosis (Tumor/Non-tumor) of the resected specimens. The unit of analysis is the individual specimen. The following metrics will be calculated: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV).
From the time of surgery until the final pathology report is available, assessed up to 1 week post-operatively.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Tumor-to-Background Ratio (TBR)
Intraoperative
Incidence of ICG-Related Adverse Events
From the time of ICG injection through 24 hours post-surgery
Study Arms (1)
ICG Fluorescence Imaging Group
EXPERIMENTALAll enrolled participants receive ICG fluorescence-guided surgery. Following standard tumor curettage, the bone cavity is systematically explored using a near-infrared fluorescence imaging system. The intervention consists of detecting residual fluorescence signals, obtaining verification samples for blinded pathological assessment, and performing supplementary curettage of confirmed suspicious lesions to achieve potentially cleaner surgical margins.
Interventions
Participants receive an intravenous injection of Indocyanine Green (ICG) at a dose of 0.25-0.5 mg/kg, 1-6 hours prior to surgery. Intraoperatively, a near-infrared fluorescence imaging system is used to guide the exploration of the bone cavity. The intervention involves a "verify first, treat later" protocol: it includes diagnostic verification sampling of fluorescence-positive areas and, crucially, therapeutic supplementary curettage of residual fluorescent lesions that were missed during standard white-light surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with Giant Cell Tumor of Bone(GCTB), via preoperative biopsy or typical imaging (MRI), and scheduled for surgical resection.
- Capable of understanding the study and voluntarily signing the written informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Known severe history of allergy to Indocyanine Green (ICG) or iodine.
- Severe liver dysfunction.
- Women who are pregnant or lactating.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
Shanghai, China
Related Publications (10)
Nicoli F, Saleh DB, Baljer B, Chan CD, Beckingsale T, Ghosh KM, Ragbir M, Rankin KS. Intraoperative Near-infrared Fluorescence (NIR) Imaging With Indocyanine Green (ICG) Can Identify Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas Which May Provide Guidance for Oncological Resection. Ann Surg. 2021 Feb 1;273(2):e63-e68. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003857.
PMID: 32224746RESULTWang H, Ji T, Qu H, Yan T, Li D, Yang R, Tang X, Guo W. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging may detect tumour residuals during surgery for bone and soft-tissue tumours. Bone Joint J. 2023 May 1;105-B(5):551-558. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B5.BJJ-2022-0803.R1.
PMID: 37121591RESULTHuang H, He S, Wei R, Zhu X, Deng Z, Wang Y, Guo L, Lei J, Cai L, Xie Y. Near-infrared (NIR) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) may assist in intraoperative decision making and improving surgical margin in bone and soft tissue tumor surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep;128(4):612-627. doi: 10.1002/jso.27306. Epub 2023 May 13.
PMID: 37178368RESULTVinegoni C, Botnaru I, Aikawa E, Calfon MA, Iwamoto Y, Folco EJ, Ntziachristos V, Weissleder R, Libby P, Jaffer FA. Indocyanine green enables near-infrared fluorescence imaging of lipid-rich, inflamed atherosclerotic plaques. Sci Transl Med. 2011 May 25;3(84):84ra45. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001577.
PMID: 21613624RESULTNewton AD, Predina JD, Shin MH, Frenzel-Sulyok LG, Vollmer CM, Drebin JA, Singhal S, Lee MK 4th. Intraoperative Near-infrared Imaging Can Identify Neoplasms and Aid in Real-time Margin Assessment During Pancreatic Resection. Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):12-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003201.
PMID: 31188797RESULTDip F, Boni L, Bouvet M, Carus T, Diana M, Falco J, Gurtner GC, Ishizawa T, Kokudo N, Lo Menzo E, Low PS, Masia J, Muehrcke D, Papay FA, Pulitano C, Schneider-Koraith S, Sherwinter D, Spinoglio G, Stassen L, Urano Y, Vahrmeijer A, Vibert E, Warram J, Wexner SD, White K, Rosenthal RJ. Consensus Conference Statement on the General Use of Near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging and Indocyanine Green Guided Surgery: Results of a Modified Delphi Study. Ann Surg. 2022 Apr 1;275(4):685-691. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004412.
PMID: 33214476RESULTMachak GN, Snetkov AI. The impact of curettage technique on local control in giant cell tumour of bone. Int Orthop. 2021 Mar;45(3):779-789. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04860-y. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
PMID: 33094400RESULTAoude A, Nikomarov D, Perera JR, Ibe IK, Griffin AM, Tsoi KM, Ferguson PC, Wunder JS. Giant cell tumour of bone. Bone Joint J. 2023 May 1;105-B(5):559-567. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B5.BJJ-2022-1231.R1.
PMID: 37121582RESULTBasu Mallick A, Chawla SP. Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Update. Curr Oncol Rep. 2021 Mar 22;23(5):51. doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01047-5.
PMID: 33754215RESULTWerner M. Giant cell tumour of bone: morphological, biological and histogenetical aspects. Int Orthop. 2006 Dec;30(6):484-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0215-7. Epub 2006 Sep 30.
PMID: 17013643RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Orthopaedic Surgeon & Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2025
First Posted
January 2, 2026
Study Start
January 2, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share