Understanding and Treating Severe and Resistant Pathological Aggression: Using Deep Brain Stimulation to Treat Resistant Aggression
STAR
2 other identifiers
interventional
6
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Physical aggression can be defined as the use of force with the intention of causing physical injury, psychological damage or death. Pathological aggression may be associated with various psychiatric disorders. This symptom can often be improved by prescribing medication, implementing psychoeducational strategies or even electroconvulsive therapy. However, some patients exhibit such severe pathological aggression that they must be institutionalised because they pose a danger to themselves or others. These patients are then hospitalised in a unit for difficult patients (UMD) for enhanced therapeutic care. Despite this maximum level of care, the pathological aggression of a minority of patients persists, leading to a therapeutic impasse, confining the patient to the UMD for many years with social isolation, a collapsed quality of life, and major repercussions for the family. The aim of this project is to use deep brain stimulation, a controlled, reversible, adaptable and low-morbidity neurosurgical method, in six patients with pathological aggression suffering from either schizophrenia (n=3) or autism spectrum disorders (n=3). We hypothesise that the effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the Sano triangle will significantly control the pathological aggression of these six patients. This is a pilot study with randomised, crossover, double-blind evaluation. It will also provide answers regarding the safety of using SCP for this indication.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 2, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 13, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 8, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 8, 2028
January 2, 2026
December 1, 2025
2.7 years
December 18, 2025
December 18, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To evaluate the effects of SCP of the Sano triangle on pathological aggression quantified by the MOAS scale after 1 month of SCP compared to the preoperative state.
9 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
The tolerance and safety of Sano triangle SCP for treating pathological aggression in these six patients, with the collection of potential adverse events,
10 months
The evaluation of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on pathological behaviours (ICAP scores up to M10),
10 months
Assessment of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on the number of daily aggressive episodes up to M10 + 1 week,
10 months
Assessment of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on quality of life (SF-36) up to M10,
10 months
Assessment of the effects of Sano triangle SCP on socio-familial impact (GAF improved by 20% up to M10),
10 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
OFF (6-8) ON (8-10)
EXPERIMENTALGroup 1: stimulation turned off for 2 months (OFF-DBS from M6 to M8) and will be turned back on for 2 months (ON-DBS from M8 to M10).
ON (6-8) OFF (8-10)
EXPERIMENTALGroup 2: stimulation switched on for 2 months (ON-DBS from M6 to M8) and switched off for 2 months (OFF-DBS from M8 to M10).
ON (6-7) OFF (7-9) ON (9-10)
EXPERIMENTALGroup 3: stimulation switched on for 1 month (ON-DBS from M6 to M7), switched off for 2 months (OFF-DBS from M7 to M9) then switched back on for 1 month (ON-DBS from M9 to M10).
Interventions
implantation of a neurostimulator and stimulation of the triangle of Sano by alternating ON and OFF phases
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged between 18 and 70 inclusive
- A GAF score \<21
- An ICAP score \<40
- Other stable medical conditions
- No contraindications to brain imaging (MRI and CT)
- No contraindications to taking medication for travel (loxapine and diazepam)
- No contraindications to surgery
- Adult who has read and understood the information letter and signed the consent form. A psychiatrist, independent of the study and treatment, will examine the patient and determine their ability to read and understand the consent form before signing. If this is not the case, authorisation may be given by the guardianship judge in accordance with Article L. 1111-6.
- An adult assisted by their guardian or by the judge who has read and understood the information letter and signed the consent form (if the patient is under guardianship). If the guardian does not wish to give an opinion or make a decision for the patient, the guardianship judge may be consulted in accordance with Article L1223-1.
- Patients covered by social health insurance (except AME)
- Surgically sterile women (hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy)
- Menopausal women: Post-menopausal status is defined as the absence of menstruation for 12 months without any other medical cause. Elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels in the post-menopausal interval may be used to confirm post-menopausal status in women who are not using hormonal contraception or hormone replacement therapy. However, in the absence of 12 months of amenorrhoea, a single FSH measurement is insufficient.
- For schizophrenic patients
- All previous treatments have failed, including the combination of clozapine (for at least 6 months with clozapine levels \> 350 ng/mL) + ECT (minimum 20 sessions)
- Have had at least two clozapine potentiations among the following: lithium, valproic acid, beta-blockers, other antipsychotics.
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Minors
- Contraindications to surgery and anaesthesia
- Contraindications to the use of the Medical Device (diathermy, certain magnetic resonance imaging procedures, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), (see section 'Contraindications' in the 'Information for Prescribers' manual for the implanted neurostimulator)
- Contraindications to MRI and CT scans (cardiac or neural pacemakers, ferromagnetic surgical clips, implants and metallic objects, intraocular foreign bodies, pregnancy, claustrophobia, cardiac or neural pacemakers, ferromagnetic surgical clips, implants and metallic objects, intraocular foreign bodies, etc.)
- Other medical problems interfering with the protocol and surgery
- Pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Rouenlead
- Centre Hospitalier du Rouvraycollaborator
- Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetrierecollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2025
First Posted
January 2, 2026
Study Start
January 13, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 8, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 8, 2028
Last Updated
January 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12