NCT07310602

Brief Summary

The environment of the labor room may influence how women experience childbirth. Light levels, in particular, may affect comfort, stress, and the course of labor. However, there is limited high-quality evidence on whether keeping the labor room lighting dim has measurable benefits for mothers. This study aims to evaluate the effects of dim light exposure during active labor on pain, anxiety, and labor progress. Pregnant women who are in active labor at term will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will give birth in a room with dim lighting (50-80 lux), while the other group will receive standard room lighting as part of routine care. Pain and anxiety levels will be measured at specific time points during labor using standard assessment scales. Information about labor duration, use of labor medications, mode of delivery, and newborn outcomes will also be collected. The dim light intervention does not interfere with routine obstetric care and does not pose additional risk to the mother or baby. If needed for clinical reasons, room lighting can be increased immediately. The results of this study may help determine whether a simple change in the birth environment can improve maternal comfort and labor outcomes.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
1mo left

Started Jan 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress84%
Jan 2026Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 16, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 30, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 6, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

April 9, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

December 16, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 4, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Dim lightLighting intensityLabor room environmentLabor painAnxiety during laborChildbirthIntrapartum careNon-pharmacological intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain intensity over time (VAS-AUC, 0-120 minutes)

    Pain intensity will be assessed using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline (0 minutes), 60 minutes, and 120 minutes after allocation. The area under the curve (AUC) for VAS from 0 to 120 minutes will be calculated as the primary outcome.

    From baseline to 120 minutes during active labor

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Anxiety level (STAI-S change)

    From baseline to 90 minutes during active labor

  • Oxytocin use (initiation rate and total dose)

    During labor until delivery

  • Duration of active phase of labor

    From enrollment to full dilation

  • Duration of second stage of labor

    From full dilation to delivery

  • Mode of delivery

    At delivery

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Dim Light (50-80 Lux)

EXPERIMENTAL

Labor room lighting will be maintained at 50-80 lux using warm white/amber light sources. Illumination will be monitored at regular intervals with a lux meter. Standard intrapartum care will be provided; lighting may be increased immediately if clinically needed.

Other: Dim Light Exposure During Labor

Routine Lighting (Control)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Routine labor room lighting will be maintained according to standard clinical practice. Standard intrapartum care will be provided.

Other: Routine Labor Room Lighting

Interventions

Adjustment of labor room illumination to a target range of 50-80 lux during active labor, with monitoring using a lux meter; lighting can be increased at any time for clinical reasons.

Dim Light (50-80 Lux)

Standard labor room lighting conditions maintained according to routine clinical practice, without modification of illumination levels.

Routine Lighting (Control)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Pregnant individuals aged 18-45 years
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Vertex (cephalic) presentation
  • Gestational age ≥37 weeks
  • Active labor at enrollment (cervical dilation between 4 and 8 cm)
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Planned or ongoing epidural analgesia
  • Multiple pregnancy
  • Severe preeclampsia or other obstetric complications requiring immediate intervention
  • Known photosensitivity or light-related sensitivity disorders
  • History of psychiatric disorders that may interfere with anxiety assessment
  • Any condition deemed by the clinical team to require deviation from the study protocol

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Hospital

Niğde, Niğde Province, Turkey (Türkiye)

RECRUITING

Related Publications (5)

  • Zsido AN, Teleki SA, Csokasi K, Rozsa S, Bandi SA. Development of the short version of the spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Sep;291:113223. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113223. Epub 2020 Jun 12.

    PMID: 32563747BACKGROUND
  • Wronding T, Argyraki A, Petersen JF, Topsoe MF, Petersen PM, Lokkegaard ECL. The aesthetic nature of the birthing room environment may alter the need for obstetrical interventions - an observational retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 22;9(1):303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36416-x.

    PMID: 30670709BACKGROUND
  • Balabanoff D. Color, light, and birth space design: An integrative review. Color Res Appl. 2023;48:413-32. doi: 10.1002/COL.22842

    BACKGROUND
  • Kazemi A, Beigi M, Najafabadi HE. Environmental factors influencing women's childbirth experiences in labor-delivery-recovery-postpartum unit: a qualitative cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 13;23(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05488-7.

    PMID: 36915051BACKGROUND
  • Buckley SJ. Executive Summary of Hormonal Physiology of Childbearing: Evidence and Implications for Women, Babies, and Maternity Care. J Perinat Educ. 2015;24(3):145-53. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.24.3.145.

    PMID: 26834435BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Labor PainAnxiety Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMental Disorders

Central Study Contacts

Pınar Erdoğan, Assoc. Prof.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants are assigned to one of two parallel study groups. To reduce contamination between groups, cluster randomization by delivery room and study week is applied.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, Assoc. Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2025

First Posted

December 30, 2025

Study Start

January 6, 2026

Primary Completion

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared due to the sensitive nature of intrapartum clinical data and the absence of participant consent for data sharing beyond the objectives of this study. De-identified aggregate results will be reported through publications.

Locations