Hybrid Computerized EF Training Using Virtual Human Stimuli for Autism
Developing a Home-based Executive Function Training Program for Autistic Individuals
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to learn the preliminary feasibility and efficacy of a home-based hybrid computerized executive function (EF) training program using social stimuli for autistic individuals. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1.Does hybrid EF training using virtual human stimuli improve the EF and symptoms of autistic individuals?
- 2.What are the parents' attitudes toward the training program?
- 3.Undergo computerized training at home five 30-minute sessions a week, for two weeks
- 4.Visit the university campus before and after the training program to undertake an assessment
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 27, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
ExpectedDecember 29, 2025
December 1, 2025
4 months
December 15, 2025
December 15, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
The Go/No-Go Task - The false alarm rate
The percentage of false alarms made on no-go trials
Within one week before the first training session and within one week after the last training session
The Sternberg Working Memory Task - Accuracy at set size 6
The percentage of probes recognized when arrays of 6 letters are to be remembered
Within one week before the first training session and within one week after the last training session
The Digit Task-Switching Task - Reaction time (RT) switch cost
Difference in mean RT between repeat and switch trials
Within one week before the first training session and within one week after the last training session
The Social Responsiveness Scale-2 (SRS-2) - Social Communication and Interaction (SCI) raw score
A parent-reported measure of social functioning deficits associated with autism
Within one week before the first training session and within one week after the last training session
The Social Responsiveness Scale-2 (SRS-2) - Restricted Interests and Repetitive Behavior (RRB) raw score
A parent-reported measure of behavioral inflexibility associated with autism
Within one week before the first training session and within one week after the last training session
Parents' Feedback Questionnaire - Score
Parents' attitudes toward various statements regarding the training program, rated on a 7-point Likert scale (from -3 to +3)
Within one week after the last training session
Study Arms (1)
Hybrid computerized executive function training
EXPERIMENTALHybrid computerized executive function training five 30-minute sessions a week, for two weeks.
Interventions
The Face-Judgment game trains shifting through 33 trials where players judge a face's sex or emotion based on cues. Trials include repeat or switch judgments, with cue durations decrease from 1,000 ms to 200 ms to increase difficulty. Performance metrics include mean switch RT and switch cost RT for adjusting difficulty. The Gaze-Arrow game enhances inhibition by requiring players to process gaze direction amidst distractors. Each round has 32 trials with faces and arrows pointing left or right. Arrow pairs increase from 1 to 5 across levels, increasing interference in incongruent trials, where gaze and arrow directions mismatch. Players judge gaze direction; performance is measured by mean incongruent RT and interference score. The Running Memory game trains working memory by having players recall face identities from n trials earlier, with n increasing from 1 to 5. Afterward, players select the face matching the cue from five options, with accuracy guiding level adjustments.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Having met the DSM-V-TR criteria for autism spectrum disorder
- Age between 8 and 17 years
- Normal or corrected-to-normal vision
You may not qualify if:
- Any neurological conditions
- Head injuries requiring hospitalization
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Education University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (9)
Chanceaux M, Mathot S, Grainger J. Effects of number, complexity, and familiarity of flankers on crowded letter identification. J Vis. 2014 Nov 10;14(6):7. doi: 10.1167/14.6.7.
PMID: 25384390BACKGROUNDde Vries M, Geurts HM. Cognitive flexibility in ASD; task switching with emotional faces. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 Dec;42(12):2558-68. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1512-1.
PMID: 22456815BACKGROUNDEriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & psychophysics, 16(1), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
BACKGROUNDMiyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.
PMID: 10945922BACKGROUNDMorris, N., & Jones, D. M. (1990). Memory updating in working memory: The role of the central executive. British journal of psychology, 81(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02349.x
BACKGROUNDConstantino, J. N., & Gruber, C. P. (2012). Social responsiveness scale, Second Edition (SRS-2). Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.
BACKGROUNDMonsell S. Task switching. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Mar;7(3):134-140. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00028-7.
PMID: 12639695BACKGROUNDPicton TW, Stuss DT, Alexander MP, Shallice T, Binns MA, Gillingham S. Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition. Cereb Cortex. 2007 Apr;17(4):826-38. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhk031. Epub 2006 May 12.
PMID: 16699079BACKGROUNDSternberg S. High-speed scanning in human memory. Science. 1966 Aug 5;153(3736):652-4. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3736.652.
PMID: 5939936BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Yeung, PhD
The Education University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2025
First Posted
December 29, 2025
Study Start
May 2, 2024
Primary Completion
August 27, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
December 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12