Expert Consensus on the Use of Nutraceuticals in Pregnancy: A Delphi Study
1 other identifier
observational
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a Delphi-based expert consensus project aimed at developing evidence-informed recommendations for the safe and effective use of nutriceuticals during pregnancy. Despite widespread use of vitamins, minerals, and other dietary supplements in prenatal care, significant variability exists in clinical practice regarding indications, dosing, timing, and safety monitoring.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jan 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 25, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2027
December 22, 2025
December 1, 2025
1.3 years
December 8, 2025
December 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary Outcome
Level of expert consensus on statements regarding nutraceutical use in pregnancy, measured as the proportion of panelists reaching the predefined agreement threshold (e.g., ≥70-80%) for each statement across Delphi rounds.
6-12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary outcome
6-12 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Expert Panel
The study population will consist of a purposive sample of experts in obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, and clinical nutrition who are actively involved in the care of pregnant patients and have experience or knowledge regarding the use of nutriceuticals in pregnancy.
Eligibility Criteria
he study population will consist of a purposive sample of experts in obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, and clinical nutrition who are actively involved in prenatal care and have experience or knowledge regarding the use of nutriceuticals in pregnancy. Panel Size and Rationale: Target enrollment: 20-35 experts. Sufficient to capture diverse perspectives while remaining feasible for multiple Delphi rounds. Minimum for analysis: 15 panelists, ensuring representativeness in case of attrition.
You may qualify if:
- Board-certified obstetricians, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, or clinical nutritionists with ≥5 years of relevant clinical experience.
- Active involvement in prenatal care and experience or knowledge in nutriceutical use during pregnancy.
- Engagement in clinical teaching, research, guideline development, or professional society activities related to maternal health or nutrition.
- Willingness and availability to participate in all Delphi rounds.
- Provision of informed consent to participate.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-obstetric or non-nutrition specialty.
- Less than 5 years of relevant clinical experience.
- Limited or no experience with nutriceutical counseling/prescribing in pregnancy.
- Significant undisclosed conflict of interest related to nutriceutical products.
- Inability or unwillingness to participate in all Delphi rounds.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Venus Research Center
Cairo, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2025
First Posted
December 22, 2025
Study Start
January 25, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Last Updated
December 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Delphi studies do not collect patient data, medical records, biological samples, or identifiable clinical information. Experts only give opinions, not "IPD." Their responses are anonymized, and sharing identifiable expert-level responses is not required and often discouraged