Cycling Interventions on Cognition in Children With Autism
Cycling&Autism
Why Does Learning to Ride a Bike Improve Executive Functions in Children With ASD?
2 other identifiers
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial was to determine if a specific type of cycling exercise improved executive functions in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder (both boys and girls, aged 8-10 years, no healthy volunteers). The main questions it addressed were:
- 1.. Did learning to ride a real bicycle improve planning, flexibility, working memory, and inhibition more than stationary cycling?
- 2..Was the benefit driven by (A) dynamic balance, (B) spatial updating, or both?
- 3.. Provided a small urine sample three times for BDNF brain-marker testing.
- 4.. Played four short tablet games (10 minutes each) at 1st intervention session , 4th intervention session and 8th intervention session to assess their Executive Functions.
- 5.. Attended four 45-minute cycling sessions per week for 2 weeks at their respective school.
- 6..Continued all usual therapies; no medicine was administered
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 22, 2025
CompletedDecember 22, 2025
December 1, 2025
1.5 years
December 4, 2025
December 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Cognitive Planning
Planning: Participant's ability to plan was assessed using computerized PEBL Tower of London (PEBL TOL) task. Participants were presented a sequence of three different colored balls on three pegs of different lengths on a computer screen. During each of the 12 trials, participants were instructed to move the balls using a computer mouse to match the target peg arrangement in a minimum amount of moves according to the pre-specified rules. The level of the task difficulty and the restriction on number of moves were progressively higher over time. If there were three consecutive failed trial attempts, the task was halted. Scores for children's general planning ability were calculated by summing the correct tasks performed out of the 12 trials given, and the total score ranges from 0 to 36. Higher scores indicated better planning.
Baseline (T1: day 1), 4th Intervention Session (T2: Day 4), 8th Intervention Session (T3: Day 8)
Working Memory
Working memory: Participants' visual-spatial working memory was evaluated using the Corsi block tapping task. In the CBTT, participants observed and replicated a sequence of tapped blocks, starting with three blocks. Sequence length increased by one after every two trials. The task ended after two incorrect sequences of the same length, with the longest correctly repeated sequence recorded as the score. Higher scores indicated better working memory.
Baseline (T1: day 1), 4th Intervention Session (T2: day 4), 8th Intervention Session (T3: day 8)
Inhibition
The participants' ability to inhibit unwanted responses to changing stimuli was measured by a computerized Go/No-go (GNG) task. In the task, participants pressed a left or right key for corresponding arrows (Go response) but withheld responses for up arrows (No-go response). After 20 practice trials, they completed 300 trials: 220 Go trials (110 left, 110 right) and 80 No-go trials (26.7%), which were presented randomly via E-Prime 3.0 software. Each stimulus appeared for 500 ms, followed by a 1000 ms blank interval. Breaks of 2 minutes were offered after every 60 trials. No feedback was provided, and response times were recorded but not analyzed due to unreliable recording . False alarms (FA), defined as Go responses on No-go trials, measured inhibition, with lower FA rates indicating better inhibitory control.
Baseline (T1: day 1), 4th Intervention Session (T2: day 4), 8th Intervention Session (T3: day 8)
Flexibility
Children's Color Trail Making Test (CCTT) was employed to assess cognitive flexibility of the participants. Participants completed two parts of the TMT as quickly and accurately as possible. In Part 1 (CCTT-1), they connected numbered circles in ascending order using a single color (e.g., black 1-2-3). In Part 2 (CCTT-2), they alternated between connecting numbered circles of two colors (e.g., black 1, yellow 2, pink 3), requiring task-switching between color sets. Cognitive flexibility was quantified by the interference score, which was calculated by the difference of time between Part 2 and Part 1 (i.e. CCTT-2 minus CCTT-1), where lower scores indicate better cognitive flexibility, reflecting enhanced ability to shift between mental sets.
Baseline (T1), 4th Intervention Session (T2), 8th Intervention Session (T3)
Urinary BDNF level
Urine samples from the participants were collected in 120-ml sterile cups . Upon completion, the samples were promptly transported from participants' homes to the laboratory of the Department of Chemical Pathology located at Princes Wales Hospital.
Baseline (T1: day 1), 4th Intervention Session (T2: day 4), 8th Intervention Session (T3: day 8)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Heart Rate Variability
Baseline (T1: day 1), 4th Intervention Session (T2: day 4), 8th Intervention Session (T3: day 8)
Study Arms (4)
Learning to Bicycle
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were asked to ride on a normal bicycle with training wheels. Participants were then progressed to a two-wheel bicycle. To keep participants on the learning curve, they were asked to ride through an obstacle course that was progressively more difficult to navigate.
Bicycle Treadmill
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group first learned how to ride a normal bicycle with its back wheel and training wheels on a roller and the front wheel on the holder stand. Then they were progressed to ride the two-wheel bicycle with its back wheel on a roller (no training wheels), and finally to the conventional two-wheel bicycle on the rollers.
Cycling with Training Wheels
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group were asked to ride a bicycle with training wheels throughout the whole study. They also rode through an obstacle course as they became more proficient at riding.
Stationary Cycling
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the group were asked to cycle on a stationary bicycle, with progress tracked via cumulative time/distance graphs.
Interventions
2 weeks, 4×45 min/week. Progressive removal of stabilisers on 16-inch bikes. Recruited both dynamic balance and spatial updating during real locomotion.
2 weeks, 4×45 min/week. Bike fixed on smart rollers. Recruited dynamic balance only.
2 weeks, 4×45 min/week. Fixed stabilisers. Recruits spatial updating only.
2 weeks, 4 ×45 min/week. Monark ergometer. Active control; recruited NEITHER dynamic balance nor spatial updating mechanism.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- age 8 - 10 years;
- mild to moderate ASD diagnosis from physicians or psychologists based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, (DSM-5)and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 2nd Edition (ADOS-2);
- non-verbal IQ over 70 using a brief version of Wechsler intelligence scale for children (Chinese revised);
- able to follow instructions with the assistance of research staff;
- able to perform the requested physical activity intervention and executive function measures with the assistance of research staff;
- no additional regular participation in physical activity other than school physical education classes for at least 3 months prior to the study;
- (6) novice at riding a two-wheel bicycle (i.e., cannot ride the bicycle alone for more than 10 consecutive seconds).
- color blindness reported by parents;
- history of other medical conditions that limit physical exercise capacities (e.g., asthma, seizure, cardiac disease);
- history of brain injury including concussions, other complex neurologic disorders (e.g., epilepsy, phenylketonuria, fragile X syndrome);
- on current or recent use of antidepressants and other psychotropic medications known to alter peripheral BDNF levels;
- medical conditions of the bladder;
- obesity (i.e. \>95th percentile of age-gender specific BMI cutoff).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chinese University of Hong Konglead
- San Francisco State Universitycollaborator
- United Christian Hospitalcollaborator
- University of Leicestercollaborator
- Education University of Hong Kongcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (1)
Ng JSK, Chau JPC, Chan AWK, Lui JKC, Cheng JWCH. A Nurse-Led Web-Based Home Asthma Education Program for Children and their Families: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Jul-Aug;59:158-163. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
PMID: 33894543BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andy Choi-Yeung Tse, PhD
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2025
First Posted
December 22, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion
June 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
December 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
According to the ethical approval form, we must not share any individual participant data to anyone other than the research team members.